| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? 16:41 - Aug 23 with 8693 views | ArgyBargy1982 |
Net £3m - £4m spent and have we ended up with a better player? |  | | |  |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 16:45 - Aug 23 with 6742 views | rsonist |
Let go. |  | | |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 16:50 - Aug 23 with 6707 views | pomanjou |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 16:45 - Aug 23 by rsonist |
Let go. |
We don't know how much was spent and we haven't seen the guy in the Hoops.
Not that Phillips will have to do a lot to convince me that he is better than Mackie........ |  |
| |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 16:51 - Aug 23 with 6690 views | Tonto |
yes we have.
but thanks for asking |  |
| |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 16:53 - Aug 23 with 6680 views | HOOPNO7 |
Yes he is. |  | | |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 16:56 - Aug 23 with 6640 views | Phildo |
Love Mackie but this fella has the potential to be a much better player |  | | |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 17:30 - Aug 23 with 6486 views | hoopstilidie |
Phillips has yet to reach his full potential, Mackie already has. |  |
| |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 17:32 - Aug 23 with 6472 views | Gloucs_R |
Yes, he is. Mackie is a trier but not a winger and not a forward. Phillips is supposed to be mustard! |  |
| |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 17:34 - Aug 23 with 6462 views | baz_qpr |
Having not seen much of him its hard to answer but we've bought a 22 year old and sold a 27 year old so that seems like sensible business |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 17:45 - Aug 23 with 6399 views | Fearless |
The answers no - IMHO
Footballs about what you've done - more than about what you might do.
Mackie was a catalyst (eg away at Derby) and was a crucial part (injury aside) of the team that actually won something!
And he scored memorable goals such as Liverpool at home.
Phillips MIGHT go on to achieve similar, and I hope he does.
However, currently the jury's out as to whether he's Richard Ord or Martin Rowlands (ie signed whilst injured)
Just my opinion |  | | |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 17:49 - Aug 23 with 6379 views | bosh67 |
He's a different player to Mackie. He's definitely the player you get when you can't get Townsend. Him, Townsend and Austin would have a field day. Pleased we've got Phillips, I've seen him play a few times and he's similar in style to Townsend, albeit right footed, and he is very very quick at this level. Plus he's over 6 foot and apparently good in the air too. |  |
| |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 17:52 - Aug 23 with 6362 views | kingo |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 17:49 - Aug 23 by bosh67 |
He's a different player to Mackie. He's definitely the player you get when you can't get Townsend. Him, Townsend and Austin would have a field day. Pleased we've got Phillips, I've seen him play a few times and he's similar in style to Townsend, albeit right footed, and he is very very quick at this level. Plus he's over 6 foot and apparently good in the air too. |
Better is him, Austin and Hoilett surely. |  |
| RIP: Sniffer, Doug and Pat |
| |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 17:58 - Aug 23 with 6331 views | 100percent |
if he can trap a ball and then run with it at his feet, I'd say yes, he's a better player. |  | | |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 17:58 - Aug 23 with 6330 views | bosh67 |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 17:52 - Aug 23 by kingo |
Better is him, Austin and Hoilett surely. |
Agreed but who's this Surely character? | |
| |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 18:05 - Aug 23 with 6305 views | Inglesio |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 17:58 - Aug 23 by 100percent |
if he can trap a ball and then run with it at his feet, I'd say yes, he's a better player. |
 |  | | |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 21:10 - Aug 23 with 6041 views | TW_R |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 17:45 - Aug 23 by Fearless |
The answers no - IMHO
Footballs about what you've done - more than about what you might do.
Mackie was a catalyst (eg away at Derby) and was a crucial part (injury aside) of the team that actually won something!
And he scored memorable goals such as Liverpool at home.
Phillips MIGHT go on to achieve similar, and I hope he does.
However, currently the jury's out as to whether he's Richard Ord or Martin Rowlands (ie signed whilst injured)
Just my opinion |
"Footballs about what you've done - more than about what you might do."
So we should've signed Pele and Maradonna? |  | | |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 21:29 - Aug 23 with 5988 views | Fearless |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 21:10 - Aug 23 by TW_R |
"Footballs about what you've done - more than about what you might do."
So we should've signed Pele and Maradonna? |
Apologies for not making myself clear.
My point was that Mackie has achieved for QPR - whether individuals rate him as a player or not.
Phillips hasn't - YET
Therefore - is Phillips better than Mackie (for QPR) = no (for now)
In a years time, the answer could be yes.
I don't understand your reference to Pele and Maradona | | | |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 21:45 - Aug 23 with 5944 views | MedwayR |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 21:29 - Aug 23 by Fearless |
Apologies for not making myself clear.
My point was that Mackie has achieved for QPR - whether individuals rate him as a player or not.
Phillips hasn't - YET
Therefore - is Phillips better than Mackie (for QPR) = no (for now)
In a years time, the answer could be yes.
I don't understand your reference to Pele and Maradona |
I think you're looking at it the wrong way, it's not about what Mackie has done for us in the past, it's what he would've done for us in the future. For my money Phillips will give us more than Mackie would have. |  |
| |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 21:53 - Aug 23 with 5908 views | Fearless |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 21:45 - Aug 23 by MedwayR |
I think you're looking at it the wrong way, it's not about what Mackie has done for us in the past, it's what he would've done for us in the future. For my money Phillips will give us more than Mackie would have. |
Fair enough | | | |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 21:57 - Aug 23 with 5892 views | TW_R |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 21:29 - Aug 23 by Fearless |
Apologies for not making myself clear.
My point was that Mackie has achieved for QPR - whether individuals rate him as a player or not.
Phillips hasn't - YET
Therefore - is Phillips better than Mackie (for QPR) = no (for now)
In a years time, the answer could be yes.
I don't understand your reference to Pele and Maradona |
Well I was just being a bit silly really, but the point was really that Pele and Maradona both achieved a lot more than Mackie, but it doesn't mean they would be better than him now. Because a player hasn't played for QPR yet doesn't mean he can't be better than a player who has. | | | |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 22:01 - Aug 23 with 5882 views | dolcelatte |
Phillips is Windows 7 whereas Mackie is Windows 95 and no longer supported. |  |
| |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 22:02 - Aug 23 with 5877 views | BrazilNutR |
I hope so....
but then i was excited when we signed SWP and Hoilet.... and they came with good reputations and experience and have done nothing so far really. Mackie came and was a fairly underwhelming signing...but did very well and suprised me.
I think Remy is the only signing I can really remember that was a big name and big money signing that actually looked his worth once he put on the hoops... |  | | |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 22:06 - Aug 23 with 5868 views | Esgaroth |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 22:01 - Aug 23 by dolcelatte |
Phillips is Windows 7 whereas Mackie is Windows 95 and no longer supported. |
 |  |
| Been here since 1984. Now THAT is what you call punishment |
| |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 22:49 - Aug 23 with 5765 views | CamberleyR |
If he's half as good as the last winger we signed from Blackpool, he'll be some player. |  |
| |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 23:56 - Aug 23 with 5648 views | CanadaRanger |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 22:01 - Aug 23 by dolcelatte |
Phillips is Windows 7 whereas Mackie is Windows 95 and no longer supported. |
No intention to dis Phillips (whom I haven't seen yet), but....
I'd still take old but reliable Windows 95 over some of the other operators we hired recently.
Those overpaid, underachieving players that were supposed to give us a solid foundation in the Premiership were Windows CE, Windows Me and Windows NT mixed into one... That would be Windows CEMeNT... |  | | |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 00:03 - Aug 24 with 5631 views | WestbourneR |
| PHILLIPS BETTER THAN MACKIE? on 17:58 - Aug 23 by 100percent |
if he can trap a ball and then run with it at his feet, I'd say yes, he's a better player. |
Said in one. Well done that man |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
