| This fella’ Birch. 21:44 - Apr 9 with 9155 views | Lohengrin |
Surely to God after the three weeks he’s been here, after what he’s seen, he has to be reporting back to his financial masters that this isn’t a project to be written off. Investment would be the smart move.
FFS, mun!  |  |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |  |
| This fella’ Birch. on 07:13 - Apr 11 with 1143 views | glanmorjak |
| This fella’ Birch. on 11:32 - Apr 10 by costalotta |
Agree with some of that but certainly not the setting targets bit
When we sent up we didn't spend like Newcastle (which to be fair is not the same as the Wolves example). Did Huddersfield spend like Wolves / Newcastle ? Or Cardiff, Brighton, Palace or the others teams one pick out.
Being unable to refuse offers for certain players is something every club bar 1 or 2 has to deal with. We're no different. But, you need to look at when you sell, where the club is when you sell and how you sell and replace. The higher up the leagues the more you'll get, the better you can invest in and the more likely you as a club will be in a far better place. Selling on the way down is and has always been short termism and is unlikely to end well. Whereas selling on the way up and when you get there is... |
Decision making in football is not the same as playing football manager on the pc, even though some think so. Selling and signing players doesn't always work out when you want it to. Why have so many of our transfer deals happened during the last hours before a window closes. The reason is that a club will only sell/loan when they have secured a replacement.
In the ideal world it is best to sell on the way up, but who decides that. Many factors, something a small club like the Swans can't afford. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
