| Squad Numbers 17:02 - Jul 30 with 1676 views | BAWHoops |
Any clues from the friendliest who is going to wear what this season? |  |
| http://blogandwhitehoops.wordpress.com/ |
| |  |
| Squad Numbers on 17:06 - Jul 30 with 1670 views | simmo |
Rio 5
Caulker 4 (which is wrong)
Everyone else pretty much the same I reckon. |  |
| ask Beavis I get nothing Butthead |
| |
| Squad Numbers on 17:09 - Jul 30 with 1658 views | loftboy |
| Squad Numbers on 17:06 - Jul 30 by simmo |
Rio 5
Caulker 4 (which is wrong)
Everyone else pretty much the same I reckon. |
I heard that Barton is changing to 8 |  |
| |
| Squad Numbers on 12:49 - Jul 31 with 1489 views | gjc104 |
Barton was 8 on Tuesday and Dunne has gone 22 to accomodate Rio at 5 |  | | |
| Squad Numbers on 12:57 - Jul 31 with 1480 views | QPunkR |
| Squad Numbers on 17:06 - Jul 30 by simmo |
Rio 5
Caulker 4 (which is wrong)
Everyone else pretty much the same I reckon. |
Yeah, but I presume Clint'll be keeping hold of the #6 shirt. |  |
| |
| Squad Numbers on 13:00 - Jul 31 with 1473 views | freddieeddie |
Defo heard that Faurlin will be wearing number 2. He requested it as he runs at 2mph at full sprint. | |
| |
| Squad Numbers on 13:01 - Jul 31 with 1470 views | Hunterhoop |
What's The Chief's number? |  | | |
| Squad Numbers on 13:11 - Jul 31 with 1438 views | simmo |
| Squad Numbers on 13:01 - Jul 31 by Hunterhoop |
What's The Chief's number? |
Is it 15?
It should be Simpson 2, Traore 3, Caulker and Rio 6 and 5 respectively. Faurlin should get 4, Barton 8, Philips 7 , Hoilett 11, Austin 9.
Keep the 10 free for Fer  | |
| ask Beavis I get nothing Butthead |
| |
| Squad Numbers on 13:18 - Jul 31 with 1419 views | QPunkR |
| Squad Numbers on 13:11 - Jul 31 by simmo |
Is it 15?
It should be Simpson 2, Traore 3, Caulker and Rio 6 and 5 respectively. Faurlin should get 4, Barton 8, Philips 7 , Hoilett 11, Austin 9.
Keep the 10 free for Fer |
Fer's not a Rangers #10!!
Agree Ale should get the #4 though | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Squad Numbers on 13:21 - Jul 31 with 1415 views | simmo |
| Squad Numbers on 13:18 - Jul 31 by QPunkR |
Fer's not a Rangers #10!!
Agree Ale should get the #4 though |
He will be the nearest we will have to a #10, if he signs (although I don't think he will).
Adel should be our 10 as we know, but he won't even play at this rate.
Fer is 10 for Norwich I think. | |
| ask Beavis I get nothing Butthead |
| |
| Squad Numbers on 13:25 - Jul 31 with 1407 views | QPunkR |
| Squad Numbers on 13:21 - Jul 31 by simmo |
He will be the nearest we will have to a #10, if he signs (although I don't think he will).
Adel should be our 10 as we know, but he won't even play at this rate.
Fer is 10 for Norwich I think. |
That's exactly what I was thinking, the #10 should belong to Tarbs obviously but Arry wouldn't even like him if he'd shown up at proper fighting weight having banged in 20 for Milan last season. Then again so would shit-loads of Rangers fans judging by responses on here.
Still don't think Fer's enough of a Rangers 10. If we don't sign anyone in the right mould and Adel doesn't shift the weight and sort himself out, we should leave the #10 vacant for the moment. | |
| |
| Squad Numbers on 13:31 - Jul 31 with 1402 views | freddieeddie |
| Squad Numbers on 13:11 - Jul 31 by simmo |
Is it 15?
It should be Simpson 2, Traore 3, Caulker and Rio 6 and 5 respectively. Faurlin should get 4, Barton 8, Philips 7 , Hoilett 11, Austin 9.
Keep the 10 free for Fer |
OK well Faurlin could reach 4mph at a push but no way can he have a higher number than that. | |
| |
| Squad Numbers on 14:15 - Jul 31 with 1367 views | Antti_Heinola |
| Squad Numbers on 13:18 - Jul 31 by QPunkR |
Fer's not a Rangers #10!!
Agree Ale should get the #4 though |
Ale should get his number 11 back.
SWP should have 0. |  |
| |
| Squad Numbers on 14:21 - Jul 31 with 1358 views | Jamie |
Tine to start the petition to retire #24 out of respect for the victims of the Malian Mentalist. | | | |
| Squad Numbers on 15:49 - Jul 31 with 1303 views | adhoc_qpr |
| Squad Numbers on 13:25 - Jul 31 by QPunkR |
That's exactly what I was thinking, the #10 should belong to Tarbs obviously but Arry wouldn't even like him if he'd shown up at proper fighting weight having banged in 20 for Milan last season. Then again so would shit-loads of Rangers fans judging by responses on here.
Still don't think Fer's enough of a Rangers 10. If we don't sign anyone in the right mould and Adel doesn't shift the weight and sort himself out, we should leave the #10 vacant for the moment. |
I don't think Harry would have played Adel even had he turned up fighting fit....
Fer is more box to box than playmaker (and is probably heading to St Mary's). | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
