| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 09:47 - May 25 with 1976 views | Phil_S |
Did she say 20% of directors are women? |  | |  |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 09:51 - May 25 with 1962 views | Shaky |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 09:47 - May 25 by Phil_S |
Did she say 20% of directors are women? |
Out trolling again, Phil?
That's my cue to head to Sainsburys.
- 3 out of 10 board members female
- 0 out of 10 board members HR directors
- 0 out of 10 board members female HR directors |  |
| |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 09:54 - May 25 with 1958 views | Phil_S |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 09:51 - May 25 by Shaky |
Out trolling again, Phil?
That's my cue to head to Sainsburys.
- 3 out of 10 board members female
- 0 out of 10 board members HR directors
- 0 out of 10 board members female HR directors |
Trolling? Just asking a question no need for you to be so touchy
You obviously regrouped yourself last night | | | |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 09:54 - May 25 with 1957 views | PozuelosSideys |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 09:43 - May 25 by Shaky |
Looking at this another way, eyeballing the numbers it looks like there is a minimum average of 10 directors for each of the FTSE-100 companies, making a total in excess of 1,000 directors.
If 20% are women that's at least 200 female directors, which BTW sounds low to me.
According to Lisa's "actual facts" a majority of those should be HR directors, which implies that all 100 FTSE companies have a female HR director on their main board, and one or more has at least two!
Now maybe it is offensive to call Lisa full of shit. It is nevertheless the truth. |
You're getting more and more confused.
Let's be honest, she tore you a new one and youre wriggling around like a little worm on a hook. |  |
| "Michu, Britton and Williams could have won 3-0 on their own. They wouldn't have required a keeper." | | Poll: | Hattricks |
| |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 10:13 - May 25 with 1908 views | Shaky |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 09:54 - May 25 by Phil_S |
Trolling? Just asking a question no need for you to be so touchy
You obviously regrouped yourself last night |
If you can't even follow the conversation at such a basic level, maybe you should withhold your multiple pronouncements on who's getting the better of whom. | |
| |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 10:14 - May 25 with 1905 views | Shaky |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 09:54 - May 25 by PozuelosSideys |
You're getting more and more confused.
Let's be honest, she tore you a new one and youre wriggling around like a little worm on a hook. |
Maybe by the time I get back with the shopping you can come up with something substantive. I'm not holding my breath, however. | |
| |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 10:21 - May 25 with 1902 views | Phil_S |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 10:13 - May 25 by Shaky |
If you can't even follow the conversation at such a basic level, maybe you should withhold your multiple pronouncements on who's getting the better of whom. |
Nothing changes you can't answer the basic questions so have a nice day | | | |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 10:26 - May 25 with 1894 views | swanny |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 10:14 - May 25 by Shaky |
Maybe by the time I get back with the shopping you can come up with something substantive. I'm not holding my breath, however. |
Look,I have no idea what this tells me, other than the fact that you can gather facts to support anything.....out of 100 FTSE companies, there are 50 directors named with responsibilities including but not limited to HR. Out of those 50, 2 are women. Extrapolating those figures (which, whilst not necessarily accurate) statistically shows that the only two women named have responsibility for (though not necessarily limited to) HR. Am I missing something here? |  |
| 'Sorry, your password must contain a capital letter, two numbers, a symbol, an inspiring message, a spell, a gang sign, a hieroglyph and the blood of a virgin" |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 10:28 - May 25 with 1887 views | PozuelosSideys |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 10:14 - May 25 by Shaky |
Maybe by the time I get back with the shopping you can come up with something substantive. I'm not holding my breath, however. |
There is no need for something with more substance. You move the numbers around, you move the definitions around, you misinterpret everything everyone says and frankly, you havent got a clue as to what youre talking about, just like i mentioned when you entered this thread.
Youve made yourself a laughing stock on this thread. Id be sooo embarrassed. | |
| "Michu, Britton and Williams could have won 3-0 on their own. They wouldn't have required a keeper." | | Poll: | Hattricks |
| |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 11:21 - May 25 with 1841 views | Brynmill_Jack |
Jeez I can't believe this thread is still running .
Does any of this sh*t really matter? |  |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 11:25 - May 25 with 1837 views | Darran |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 11:21 - May 25 by Brynmill_Jack |
Jeez I can't believe this thread is still running .
Does any of this sh*t really matter? |
It's Sprattys life cut him some slack like,he's gutted it didn't go to court so he could support Loudstrop. |  |
| |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 11:26 - May 25 with 1834 views | swanny |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 11:21 - May 25 by Brynmill_Jack |
Jeez I can't believe this thread is still running .
Does any of this sh*t really matter? |
No, it matters not a jot - I had way too much time on my hands :(
I'm watching the ODI now, so that's probably me done for the rest of the day. | |
| 'Sorry, your password must contain a capital letter, two numbers, a symbol, an inspiring message, a spell, a gang sign, a hieroglyph and the blood of a virgin" |
| |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 11:28 - May 25 with 1825 views | Brynmill_Jack |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 11:26 - May 25 by swanny |
No, it matters not a jot - I had way too much time on my hands :(
I'm watching the ODI now, so that's probably me done for the rest of the day. |
Enjoy your Pimms! And pass your husband the phone and the takeaway menu  | |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 11:32 - May 25 with 1822 views | swanny |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 11:28 - May 25 by Brynmill_Jack |
Enjoy your Pimms! And pass your husband the phone and the takeaway menu |
I made the mistake of buying the elderflower Pimms - it's way too sweet so I'm mixing it with Fernet Branca - probably a mistake but I can't bring myself to waste it. | |
| 'Sorry, your password must contain a capital letter, two numbers, a symbol, an inspiring message, a spell, a gang sign, a hieroglyph and the blood of a virgin" |
| |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 11:43 - May 25 with 1803 views | Brynmill_Jack |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 11:32 - May 25 by swanny |
I made the mistake of buying the elderflower Pimms - it's way too sweet so I'm mixing it with Fernet Branca - probably a mistake but I can't bring myself to waste it. |
I know. I'm like that with all my alcohol too  | |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 11:56 - May 25 with 1774 views | Drizzy |
The PS hounds as it again.
They don't like your style, Shake, but they don't want to challenge you so they'll ride the coattails of anybody who does.
It only takes a couple of them to claim you're "taking a hammering" for them to all to jump on the bandwagon.
Read this thread without his comments and it's a rather asinine back and forth between two posters who really don't have enough information to be discussing the topic in such depth.
As you were though. |  |
| |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 12:17 - May 25 with 1748 views | swanny |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 11:56 - May 25 by Drizzy |
The PS hounds as it again.
They don't like your style, Shake, but they don't want to challenge you so they'll ride the coattails of anybody who does.
It only takes a couple of them to claim you're "taking a hammering" for them to all to jump on the bandwagon.
Read this thread without his comments and it's a rather asinine back and forth between two posters who really don't have enough information to be discussing the topic in such depth.
As you were though. |
Well, you don't name who you deem to be 'riding the coat tails' - so I'll take it that I'm included in that, since I'm just sitting here watching the ODI, I'll reply on behalf of the coattail riders....I have taken exception to certain legal posturing from Shaky before and commented to that effect, in this particular case I didn't like his assertion that Lisa was full of shit...so I went to look up the information for myself and found that not to be the case....in fact as I said you can randomly pluck out figures and facts to suit any argument. I'm not disputing that the whole thread is an 'asinine back and forth between (although not limited to) two posters, what I am suggesting is that Shaky has no further insider knowledge on how these things work than anybody else, even though his posts appear to be from a position of absolute certainty. Whereas, in the past, Lisa has posted both thoughtfully and accurately on many subjects, therefore I (and several other posters) chose to prefer Lisa's argument. I hope this helps you. | |
| 'Sorry, your password must contain a capital letter, two numbers, a symbol, an inspiring message, a spell, a gang sign, a hieroglyph and the blood of a virgin" |
| |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 13:19 - May 25 with 1709 views | londonlisa2001 |
Much as it pains me to add anything more to this topic I'll make a couple of quick points:
Shaky - there are not 50 nor indeed 100 FTSE companies - there are a couple of thousand ish companies listed on the London Stock Exchange and about half of them are part of the FTSE.
Therefore taking any subset (none of which I mentioned - at no point did I say FTSE100 for example), and saying that makes me full of shit demonstrates absolutely nothing other than a total lack of knowledge on your part.
Having a background in HR and being a HR director are two different things (as Swanny pointed out).
Looking through any list of exec directors of FTSE100 companies does not mean you'll find all members of FTSE Boards. It simply means you'll find exec directors of 100 FTSE companies, so a subset of a subset.
Sainsbury or anyone else is not necessarily representative, so why you would expect them to exactly mimic an overall position beggars belief.
At no point did I make myself out to be 'high powered' or anything else - these are your words alone - all I said was that I was not in PR and that not all women were -I pointed out that some women were even on the Board of the companies that you supposedly advise.
I have absolutely no wish, nor indeed any need to inflate my ego by arguing on a message board with a rude bullyboy and that is exactly what you are. You make sweeping and often inaccurate statements about all things finance and legal related, based on, I'm sure, some knowledge and I have no doubt whatsoever that you are thrilled with your own 'high powered' position. Well done - you are obviously used to being the most knowledgeable person in a room. But if from time to time, you find yourself in a position where someone challenges you on aspects of what you have said, you may find it better for your development to avoid throwing your toys around and desperately searching for 'facts' to catch them out and instead listen.
Some knowledge comes from experience rather than looking stuff up on the internet you know. |  | | |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 13:23 - May 25 with 1702 views | Darran |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 13:19 - May 25 by londonlisa2001 |
Much as it pains me to add anything more to this topic I'll make a couple of quick points:
Shaky - there are not 50 nor indeed 100 FTSE companies - there are a couple of thousand ish companies listed on the London Stock Exchange and about half of them are part of the FTSE.
Therefore taking any subset (none of which I mentioned - at no point did I say FTSE100 for example), and saying that makes me full of shit demonstrates absolutely nothing other than a total lack of knowledge on your part.
Having a background in HR and being a HR director are two different things (as Swanny pointed out).
Looking through any list of exec directors of FTSE100 companies does not mean you'll find all members of FTSE Boards. It simply means you'll find exec directors of 100 FTSE companies, so a subset of a subset.
Sainsbury or anyone else is not necessarily representative, so why you would expect them to exactly mimic an overall position beggars belief.
At no point did I make myself out to be 'high powered' or anything else - these are your words alone - all I said was that I was not in PR and that not all women were -I pointed out that some women were even on the Board of the companies that you supposedly advise.
I have absolutely no wish, nor indeed any need to inflate my ego by arguing on a message board with a rude bullyboy and that is exactly what you are. You make sweeping and often inaccurate statements about all things finance and legal related, based on, I'm sure, some knowledge and I have no doubt whatsoever that you are thrilled with your own 'high powered' position. Well done - you are obviously used to being the most knowledgeable person in a room. But if from time to time, you find yourself in a position where someone challenges you on aspects of what you have said, you may find it better for your development to avoid throwing your toys around and desperately searching for 'facts' to catch them out and instead listen.
Some knowledge comes from experience rather than looking stuff up on the internet you know. |
Phwoar,do you power dress Lis? | |
| |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 13:30 - May 25 with 1686 views | swanny |
girl power | |
| 'Sorry, your password must contain a capital letter, two numbers, a symbol, an inspiring message, a spell, a gang sign, a hieroglyph and the blood of a virgin" |
| |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 13:31 - May 25 with 1688 views | Darran |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 13:30 - May 25 by swanny |
girl power |
We could have a LDL sandwich. | |
| |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 13:32 - May 25 with 1688 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 13:23 - May 25 by Darran |
Phwoar,do you power dress Lis? |
unless jogging bottoms and a hoodie is deemed power dressing then today, not so much ;) | | | |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 13:54 - May 25 with 1659 views | Brynmill_Jack |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 13:32 - May 25 by londonlisa2001 |
unless jogging bottoms and a hoodie is deemed power dressing then today, not so much ;) |
Jogging bottoms and a hoodie? Phwoar !! | |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 15:40 - May 25 with 1603 views | Musical_Swan |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 13:54 - May 25 by Brynmill_Jack |
Jogging bottoms and a hoodie? Phwoar !! |
I know! Does it for me too, although pyjama bottoms work just as well!!! |  |
| |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 15:42 - May 25 with 1596 views | Brynmill_Jack |
| Settlement reached with Laudrup on 15:40 - May 25 by Musical_Swan |
I know! Does it for me too, although pyjama bottoms work just as well!!! |
Those crotchless shellsuits are flying out of Ann Summers in Mountain Ash mind | |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
