| Today’s court case on 20:36 - Dec 12 with 3740 views | bonymine |
| Today’s court case on 18:16 - Dec 12 by fiftypencehead |
I'm not in the Netherlands, nor am I Dutch but that thanks for the insinuation.
I'm sure that you can check my IP if you are looking to find out who/where I am.
I totally agree with all that is said about the buyout, and how we as fans have been sold down the river etc. I also think that the two protagonists in the current court case are money grabbing scroats who are just looking for one more payout.
No more, no less, no agenda. |
Wâš“ï¸ |  |
|  |
| Today’s court case on 20:41 - Dec 12 with 3717 views | Garyjack |
"He also said the "whole process was unclear" and that he was under no obligation to inform non-shareholders before the deal was confirmed, adding that individuals' day-to-day roles would not change."
And there is the opening for their barrister to claim he is a dishonest man! |  | | |
| Today’s court case on 20:55 - Dec 12 with 3640 views | bonymine |
| Today’s court case on 18:16 - Dec 12 by fiftypencehead |
I'm not in the Netherlands, nor am I Dutch but that thanks for the insinuation.
I'm sure that you can check my IP if you are looking to find out who/where I am.
I totally agree with all that is said about the buyout, and how we as fans have been sold down the river etc. I also think that the two protagonists in the current court case are money grabbing scroats who are just looking for one more payout.
No more, no less, no agenda. |
You are a Wâš“ï¸.....goodbye !!! | |
| |
| Today’s court case on 20:57 - Dec 12 with 3636 views | Vetchfielder |
| Today’s court case on 20:41 - Dec 12 by Garyjack |
"He also said the "whole process was unclear" and that he was under no obligation to inform non-shareholders before the deal was confirmed, adding that individuals' day-to-day roles would not change."
And there is the opening for their barrister to claim he is a dishonest man! |
Aha, so HJ therefore knew he had an obligation to inform SHAREHOLDERS before the deal was confirmed - but chose not to in the case of the Trust.
There you have it ! [Post edited 12 Dec 2017 20:59]
|  |
| Proud to have been one of the 231 |
| |
| Today’s court case on 20:58 - Dec 12 with 3627 views | monmouth |
| Today’s court case on 20:41 - Dec 12 by Garyjack |
"He also said the "whole process was unclear" and that he was under no obligation to inform non-shareholders before the deal was confirmed, adding that individuals' day-to-day roles would not change."
And there is the opening for their barrister to claim he is a dishonest man! |
I would love Junko to be outed as a liar in a public court. I do hope they have a smoking gun. |  |
| |
| Today’s court case on 20:58 - Dec 12 with 3617 views | E20Jack |
The amount that would come out if this lot were taken to court over the takeover would be flabbergasting. |  |
| |
| Today’s court case on 21:00 - Dec 12 with 3616 views | Garyjack |
They just didn't give two fvcks who they got into bed with did they! Bunch of money grabbing sluts! | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Today’s court case on 21:09 - Dec 12 with 3560 views | Dr_Winston |
| Today’s court case on 21:00 - Dec 12 by Garyjack |
They just didn't give two fvcks who they got into bed with did they! Bunch of money grabbing sluts! |
Think after the attempt to sell to Moores and Noell was shot down they didn't give a shit who they sold to or what machinations were necessary as long as the deal went through.
And some want to forgive and forget what the f*ckers did. Crazy. |  |
| Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. |
| |
| Today’s court case on 21:14 - Dec 12 with 3522 views | fbreath |
So there was an obligation to tell all shareholders about the sale but the trust didn’t count.
Come on trust open your eyes remember what the barrister told you. |  |
| We are the first Welsh club to reach the Premier League Simples |
| |
| Today’s court case on 21:17 - Dec 12 with 3500 views | E20Jack |
| Today’s court case on 21:14 - Dec 12 by fbreath |
So there was an obligation to tell all shareholders about the sale but the trust didn’t count.
Come on trust open your eyes remember what the barrister told you. |
They did though didn't they? I don't have the timeline to hand but I am pretty confident they told the Trust prior to the deal. | |
| |
| Today’s court case on 21:19 - Dec 12 with 3492 views | max936 |
| Today’s court case on 21:09 - Dec 12 by Dr_Winston |
Think after the attempt to sell to Moores and Noell was shot down they didn't give a shit who they sold to or what machinations were necessary as long as the deal went through.
And some want to forgive and forget what the f*ckers did. Crazy. |
Why didn't the Trust take the advice of the Barrister, when he said they had a good case, you have to wonder, the damage this case could cause Jenkins and Co might change minds on the Deal hopefully, although I do sense some at the Trust what this deal signed and sealed ASAP crazy absolutely crazy. |  |
| |
| Today’s court case on 21:19 - Dec 12 with 3491 views | Darran |
| Today’s court case on 21:17 - Dec 12 by E20Jack |
They did though didn't they? I don't have the timeline to hand but I am pretty confident they told the Trust prior to the deal. |
They did tell the Trust prior to the deal being signed but the deal was way down the road before they told them. |  |
| |
| Today’s court case on 21:21 - Dec 12 with 3467 views | max936 |
| Today’s court case on 20:58 - Dec 12 by monmouth |
I would love Junko to be outed as a liar in a public court. I do hope they have a smoking gun. |
How many possible smoking guns are there I wonder? | |
| |
| Today’s court case on 21:35 - Dec 12 with 3407 views | Landore_Jack |
I wish the Trust had a set of balls to take the lying pr*ck to court. |  |
| |
| Today’s court case on 21:44 - Dec 12 with 3363 views | harryhpalmer |
| Today’s court case on 20:34 - Dec 12 by bonymine |
Agree 100% = Tosser 🙈🙄 |
I think he could find himself in Court on a libel suit if he carries on...especially if they win their case! |  |
| |
| Today’s court case on 23:15 - Dec 12 with 3198 views | swan65split |
At the time of the sale, the club was valued at £110m. Mr Jenkins earned more than £8m for selling an 8.2% stake in the club, leaving him with a 5% shareholding.
Mr Keefe and Mr Penny also allege their departures were related to age discrimination, instigated by club director and shareholder Martin Morgan.
It was put to Mr Jenkins that he agreed with Mr Morgan, who was accused of saying Mr Penny, Mr Keefe and Mr Joseph should leave and be replaced by younger directors.
"I do not think so, no," said Mr Jenkins. "What I said was the club needed to change and that's why we needed the new shareholders."
Great , change to what? |  | | |
| Today’s court case on 07:56 - Dec 13 with 3052 views | MoscowJack |
| Today’s court case on 21:17 - Dec 12 by E20Jack |
They did though didn't they? I don't have the timeline to hand but I am pretty confident they told the Trust prior to the deal. |
I would question when the Heads of Terms were signed (in the December before the deal was announced!!!???) as this would have been signed on behalf of ALL Directors/Shareholders.....and we know that not all Directors knew anything about these negotiations, let alone a deal having been agreed!
Also, did Jenkins have the right to sign on behalf of all shareholders? | |
| |
| Today’s court case on 08:47 - Dec 13 with 2980 views | monmouth |
| Today’s court case on 07:56 - Dec 13 by MoscowJack |
I would question when the Heads of Terms were signed (in the December before the deal was announced!!!???) as this would have been signed on behalf of ALL Directors/Shareholders.....and we know that not all Directors knew anything about these negotiations, let alone a deal having been agreed!
Also, did Jenkins have the right to sign on behalf of all shareholders? |
It's the Trust that should be in court today, skewering him and his false pretences MBE to the cross. | |
| |
| Today’s court case on 08:57 - Dec 13 with 2956 views | Landore_Jack |
| Today’s court case on 20:35 - Dec 12 by Vetchfielder |
If this is found to be true , would the writing of fake meeting minutes and the signing thereof be a criminal offence? |
Was just thinking the same thing. Maybe Lisa or Shaky could elaborate on this? | |
| |
| Today’s court case on 08:59 - Dec 13 with 2946 views | Whiterockin |
| Today’s court case on 08:57 - Dec 13 by Landore_Jack |
Was just thinking the same thing. Maybe Lisa or Shaky could elaborate on this? |
And if he was found guilty would he have to return his MBE. |  | | |
| Today’s court case on 09:56 - Dec 13 with 2871 views | QJumpingJack |
What a mess. | | | |
| Today’s court case on 12:28 - Dec 13 with 2757 views | Highjack |
| Today’s court case on 08:59 - Dec 13 by Whiterockin |
And if he was found guilty would he have to return his MBE. |
I think the title of Massive Bell End suits him. |  |
| |
| Today’s court case on 12:56 - Dec 13 with 2707 views | Garyjack |
| Today’s court case on 12:28 - Dec 13 by Highjack |
I think the title of Massive Bell End suits him. |
Or even 'Obese bell end', to go with his OBE?  | | | |
| Today’s court case on 13:09 - Dec 13 with 2670 views | union_jack |
| Today’s court case on 21:14 - Dec 12 by fbreath |
So there was an obligation to tell all shareholders about the sale but the trust didn’t count.
Come on trust open your eyes remember what the barrister told you. |
I'm more convinced than ever that the Trust must pull the deal off the table regardless of whether original terms have been agreed to or not.
Clasie, Lisa, please make sure this is discussed at the board meeting tomorrow. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
