| Ipswich match fred on 14:35 - Feb 6 with 2688 views | Aitch |
Quite pleased with that line up. Couple of potential game changers on the bench. Bit lightweight in centre midfield maybe?
I'm hoping Polter & Washington can be our Ferdinand & Penrice. Feeling quietly optimistic about a good result today. |  |
|  |
| Ipswich match fred on 14:38 - Feb 6 with 2660 views | SimonJames |
| Ipswich match fred on 14:28 - Feb 6 by rsonist |
 |
If we can't score a couple of goals with that line up then I'll be very disappointed. |  |
| 100% of people who drink water will die. |
| |
| Ipswich match fred on 14:41 - Feb 6 with 2627 views | TGRRRSSS |
3-1 Rangers with Washington getting his first goal methinks. |  | | |
| Ipswich match fred on 14:42 - Feb 6 with 2623 views | Blue_Castello |
| Ipswich match fred on 14:31 - Feb 6 by rsonist |
I'm glad we're being bold (rather than play Henry) but I'm not too confident that midfield's strong enough to support two up front. Still, worth a go.
Disappointed not to be seeing Robinson at least on the bench yet.
Hoilett should not really be playing IMO. |
With you on that one it's great to see two strikers BUT as Clive has said a number of times and I agree with him our midfield doesn't look strong enough to play 4-4-2.
That said its worth a try at home in a game we could win, hopefully JFH has done his homework, I think the 4-4-2 has a chance against Ipswich but would fail against teams like Wolves who have a very big muscular outfit. |  | | |
| Ipswich match fred on 14:47 - Feb 6 with 2556 views | GetMeRangers |
| Ipswich match fred on 14:42 - Feb 6 by Blue_Castello |
With you on that one it's great to see two strikers BUT as Clive has said a number of times and I agree with him our midfield doesn't look strong enough to play 4-4-2.
That said its worth a try at home in a game we could win, hopefully JFH has done his homework, I think the 4-4-2 has a chance against Ipswich but would fail against teams like Wolves who have a very big muscular outfit. |
Might succeed against Ipswich as they have the worst passing success rate at 62.5%. But that axis of Mass and Ale... not confident at all. Think Conor and Polter will have to play too far back to protect them.
Just changed my prediction to a loss. 1-2 |  | | |
| Ipswich match fred on 14:48 - Feb 6 with 2547 views | MedwayR |
| Ipswich match fred on 14:42 - Feb 6 by Blue_Castello |
With you on that one it's great to see two strikers BUT as Clive has said a number of times and I agree with him our midfield doesn't look strong enough to play 4-4-2.
That said its worth a try at home in a game we could win, hopefully JFH has done his homework, I think the 4-4-2 has a chance against Ipswich but would fail against teams like Wolves who have a very big muscular outfit. |
I don't really agree with this view that our midfield won't be strong enough to play 4-4-2, they've been playing 4-2-3-1 with the anonymous Fer in front of them for most of the season, they won't notice the difference!! |  |
| |
| Ipswich match fred on 14:50 - Feb 6 with 2519 views | Gloucs_R |
I think Polter will drop back into midfield when required |  |
| |
| Ipswich match fred on 14:52 - Feb 6 with 2493 views | Pommyhoop |
Any Links chaps??? |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Ipswich match fred on 15:02 - Feb 6 with 2355 views | Blue_Castello |
| Ipswich match fred on 14:48 - Feb 6 by MedwayR |
I don't really agree with this view that our midfield won't be strong enough to play 4-4-2, they've been playing 4-2-3-1 with the anonymous Fer in front of them for most of the season, they won't notice the difference!! |
Fingers crossed you are right, it will depend how well they have been prepared by JFH and you are right Fer has been totally shite for the majority of games he's played.
Not feeling well today so my seats empty which is a real bummer, I actually think we have a chance to win this game I went to the Ipswich away game and didn't see anything to make me think otherwise. | | | |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:03 - Feb 6 with 2348 views | isawqpratwcity |
Bollox! Radio Suffolk is NOT online. |  |
| |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:07 - Feb 6 with 2272 views | CamberleyR |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:03 - Feb 6 by isawqpratwcity |
Bollox! Radio Suffolk is NOT online. |
What about Tractor FM? |  |
| |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:07 - Feb 6 with 2265 views | BklynRanger |
Alright lads and lasses. Quite an attacking line up here. |  | | |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:08 - Feb 6 with 2243 views | itsbiga |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:07 - Feb 6 by CamberleyR |
What about Tractor FM? |
Yeah fook it I'm on bbc line by line :( | |
| |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:14 - Feb 6 with 2132 views | isawqpratwcity |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:08 - Feb 6 by itsbiga |
Yeah fook it I'm on bbc line by line :( |
+1 | |
| |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:22 - Feb 6 with 1965 views | Jigsore |
hope we see some of El Khayati today |  |
| “The thing about football - the important thing about football - is that it is not just about football.†|
| |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:25 - Feb 6 with 1778 views | isawqpratwcity |
Swansea one up!
(No, Fer's on the bench.) | |
| |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:36 - Feb 6 with 1507 views | GetMeRangers |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:25 - Feb 6 by isawqpratwcity |
Swansea one up!
(No, Fer's on the bench.) |
Who goes behind to Newcastle?
A side with Sandro at its core, thats who | | | |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:37 - Feb 6 with 1491 views | HantsR |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:25 - Feb 6 by isawqpratwcity |
Swansea one up!
(No, Fer's on the bench.) |
Baggies losing 1-0
(Sandro started)
Oh, just seen Getme's post. Oh well - Hoillet has had three on target and one just now, just wide! [Post edited 6 Feb 2016 15:40]
|  | | |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:40 - Feb 6 with 1416 views | isawqpratwcity |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:36 - Feb 6 by GetMeRangers |
Who goes behind to Newcastle?
A side with Sandro at its core, thats who |
Yes, a starter today. You think they'd husband his uninjured time more sparingly. | |
| |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:42 - Feb 6 with 1380 views | Gloucs_R |
Anyone know what formation we are playing? | |
| |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:44 - Feb 6 with 1343 views | BklynRanger |
We need to start taking these chances.
We can't shy away from their vulnerability, this is the time to get hard and stay hard.
Jimmy's oiling himself up for the halftime exhortations. | | | |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:44 - Feb 6 with 1328 views | Gloucs_R |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:37 - Feb 6 by HantsR |
Baggies losing 1-0
(Sandro started)
Oh, just seen Getme's post. Oh well - Hoillet has had three on target and one just now, just wide! [Post edited 6 Feb 2016 15:40]
|
Apparently they have to sign him on a perm if he plays x amount of games. Fingers crossed. | |
| |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:47 - Feb 6 with 1269 views | distortR |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:44 - Feb 6 by BklynRanger |
We need to start taking these chances.
We can't shy away from their vulnerability, this is the time to get hard and stay hard.
Jimmy's oiling himself up for the halftime exhortations. |
Know what you mean. We lack penetration when coming from behind. | | | |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:52 - Feb 6 with 1148 views | isawqpratwcity |
My Beeb text has only just caught up.
Faurlin booked for a foul
HT 0-0
Possession
Home48% Away52%
Shots
Home10 Away2
Shots on Target
Home5 Away1
Corners
Home1 Away2
Fouls
Home8 Away5
At least we're attacking more. | |
| |
| Ipswich match fred on 15:54 - Feb 6 with 1123 views | rsonist |
By the sounds of it we are learning that Phillips and Hoilett are best deployed as proper wingers  |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
