| Match thread 14:32 - Jan 12 with 22167 views | 442Dale |
BBM in for Kennedy
Lillis, Pearson, Edwards, Bennett, McIntyre, Cavanagh, Tutte, BBM, Grant, Grimes, Gornell
Subs. Kennedy, Minihan, Adebola, Donnelly, Putterill, Craney, Smith [Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
|  |
| |  |
| Match thread on 17:08 - Jan 12 with 1347 views | judd |
| Match thread on 17:07 - Jan 12 by Thacks_Rabbits |
Accrington Reserves!!!! |
That is us, ffs.
We are utterly unprofessional. |  |
| |
| Match thread on 17:08 - Jan 12 with 1338 views | BigDaveMyCock |
| Match thread on 17:01 - Jan 12 by ColDale |
obvious wasn't there, but we keep conceding. We knew Ryan Edwards was going back on 2nd January from around August. Surely a forward thinking club would have had plans in place ready for 3rd January rather than this trying to sort it out now.
Let's forget any talk of Play Offs now, and let's not kid ourselves with only four points behind or whatever it will be. We pretty much need two points per game for the remainder of the season. |
We've got six strikers on the books. The board can only provide the funds for the manager, he picks the players he wants. He has decided to accrue six forwards at the expense of other positions. It would be perfectly reasonable of the board to say to the manager 'no, not until you get rid of at least one of these forwards.' Instead, the manager has decided to sign one of these six on a longer-term deal. [Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
|  |
| |
| Match thread on 17:09 - Jan 12 with 1310 views | SteTsGoldenBoot |
Prob 16th when York and Torquay have played their games in hand. |  |
| Everything thats been, has past. The answers in the looking glass! |
| |
| Match thread on 17:09 - Jan 12 with 1299 views | 442Dale |
| Match thread on 17:07 - Jan 12 by D_Alien |
Only what's going through your mind now, except it happened when we could see the bloody obvious.
Sorry, but there's no haters here, just realists. |
I think that's the point; assessing the information we can all see. Nothing is improving and we aren't even bringing in players to address it. Yes, they may well come in eventually, but the areas for improving we're identified weeks ago, the work should have been done by the club to ensure the players were here for the first game after the window opened. | |
| |
| Match thread on 17:09 - Jan 12 with 1293 views | sweetcorn |
| Match thread on 17:07 - Jan 12 by D_Alien |
Only what's going through your mind now, except it happened when we could see the bloody obvious.
Sorry, but there's no haters here, just realists. |
Where did I refer to you as a hater. Please lower your feeling of self-importance. I was referring to the likes of paulscho who is very much a hater. |  |
| Leader of the little gang of immature cretins. |
| |
| Match thread on 17:10 - Jan 12 with 1270 views | olympicdale |
we are VERY LUCKY to have got so many points early on from our (then) good away form, we could have been in the bottom 3 otherwise. |  |
| |
| Match thread on 17:10 - Jan 12 with 1265 views | judd |
| Match thread on 17:09 - Jan 12 by 442Dale |
I think that's the point; assessing the information we can all see. Nothing is improving and we aren't even bringing in players to address it. Yes, they may well come in eventually, but the areas for improving we're identified weeks ago, the work should have been done by the club to ensure the players were here for the first game after the window opened. |
Will we get a parachute payment when we drop into the conference? | |
| |
| Match thread on 17:11 - Jan 12 with 1243 views | 442Dale |
| Match thread on 17:08 - Jan 12 by BigDaveMyCock |
We've got six strikers on the books. The board can only provide the funds for the manager, he picks the players he wants. He has decided to accrue six forwards at the expense of other positions. It would be perfectly reasonable of the board to say to the manager 'no, not until you get rid of at least one of these forwards.' Instead, the manager has decided to sign one of these six on a longer-term deal. [Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
|
But the manager and the club should have ensured deals were in place so that one of those strikers was on his way on Jan 1st.
They shouldn't have approved the Gornell deal. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Match thread on 17:11 - Jan 12 with 1226 views | 442Dale |
| Match thread on 17:10 - Jan 12 by judd |
Will we get a parachute payment when we drop into the conference? |
Only if we buy one that doubles up as a pitch cover. | |
| |
| Match thread on 17:13 - Jan 12 with 1190 views | judd |
| Match thread on 17:11 - Jan 12 by 442Dale |
But the manager and the club should have ensured deals were in place so that one of those strikers was on his way on Jan 1st.
They shouldn't have approved the Gornell deal. |
I wouldn't be surprised if the original budget was ripped up and stuffed in the war chest as a result of the decimation of home attendances.
Shaping up to be a disastrous season for future generations, in my opinion. | |
| |
| Match thread on 17:13 - Jan 12 with 1185 views | Yorkshire_Dale |
Out Soft Lad OUT!
You're worse than Eyre......that's saying something
Absolute disgrace! | | | |
| Match thread on 17:13 - Jan 12 with 1175 views | olympicdale |
| Match thread on 17:11 - Jan 12 by 442Dale |
Only if we buy one that doubles up as a pitch cover. |
thats the dream, multi use. We need a parachute at the moment, falling that fast. | |
| |
| Match thread on 17:14 - Jan 12 with 1164 views | Thacks_Rabbits |
| Match thread on 17:08 - Jan 12 by BigDaveMyCock |
We've got six strikers on the books. The board can only provide the funds for the manager, he picks the players he wants. He has decided to accrue six forwards at the expense of other positions. It would be perfectly reasonable of the board to say to the manager 'no, not until you get rid of at least one of these forwards.' Instead, the manager has decided to sign one of these six on a longer-term deal. [Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
|
Best signing we could make would be Flicker - Coleman imho is the worst performing manager in my living memory!!!
He had the potential to have a good side - but has buggered it up in a big way.
Hollins, Barrow, Simmo etc were poor with decent money, Dolan, D.B., Sutton, Doherty, Vic Halom were ok with no money.
I would sooner we lost and Coleman went now than we won and he stayed - May as well waste next season as well if he stays!!!! |  |
| |
| Match thread on 17:14 - Jan 12 with 1160 views | NotEyreClue |
Tell tale signs were there in the first half. Two sitters missed by them and one of them was a major Pedwards misjudgement. Thought we played OK second half and were the better team by a mile. Two sloppy goals defensively, especially the second one. Should have been a comfortably seen out 1-0 win. Our defense is so prone to imploding it's unbelievable. |  |
| The modern pioneer of mealy mouthed bollocks. |
| |
| Match thread on 17:18 - Jan 12 with 1062 views | ColDale |
Beginning to think that the Hillcroft years were part of some Faustian pact, and it's been payback ever since they left. |  | | |
| Match thread on 17:18 - Jan 12 with 1061 views | BigDaveMyCock |
| Match thread on 17:11 - Jan 12 by 442Dale |
But the manager and the club should have ensured deals were in place so that one of those strikers was on his way on Jan 1st.
They shouldn't have approved the Gornell deal. |
That was the point I was sort of making. However, it is down to the manager to say who he wants to bring in or get rid of. It's up to the board to try and make it happen. The manager has proved, with Puterill and Craney, that he isn't willing to get rid of players no matter how unfit they are.
You're right though, the manager should have realised that a centre half was the priority and not gone for Gornell. As he hasn't realised that, the board should have not approved the Gornell deal.
[Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
| |
| |
| Match thread on 17:19 - Jan 12 with 1048 views | BigKindo |
Am I correct in thinking that our best run of wins came earlier in the season when cAV was injured. When is j.c. going to start picking his best 11, i.e. not necessarily scouse speakers. I have been watching Dale for over 60 years and am now considering giving up my season ticket. The Trafford Centre beckons. Any chance the Trust can organise a walk to raise funds towards paying off these clowns. Even me with a gammy leg would have a go. You don't write such comments when you've been supporting Dale through thick and thin since 1948. Unless we get a couple of wins in the next two games we are deep in the doodoo. Saturdays are tur d days and Dalewise have become tiresome and not a good reason to have a hangover on Sunday. During the week I cannot be bothered to watch the match highlights. After 60 years I am deeply offended. Oh and by the way I was happy at the appointment of j.c. |  | | |
| Match thread on 17:19 - Jan 12 with 1033 views | judd |
| Match thread on 17:18 - Jan 12 by ColDale |
Beginning to think that the Hillcroft years were part of some Faustian pact, and it's been payback ever since they left. |
'kin 'ell, Jimmy Savile got better treatment. | |
| |
| Match thread on 17:21 - Jan 12 with 1014 views | sweetcorn |
| Match thread on 17:19 - Jan 12 by BigKindo |
Am I correct in thinking that our best run of wins came earlier in the season when cAV was injured. When is j.c. going to start picking his best 11, i.e. not necessarily scouse speakers. I have been watching Dale for over 60 years and am now considering giving up my season ticket. The Trafford Centre beckons. Any chance the Trust can organise a walk to raise funds towards paying off these clowns. Even me with a gammy leg would have a go. You don't write such comments when you've been supporting Dale through thick and thin since 1948. Unless we get a couple of wins in the next two games we are deep in the doodoo. Saturdays are tur d days and Dalewise have become tiresome and not a good reason to have a hangover on Sunday. During the week I cannot be bothered to watch the match highlights. After 60 years I am deeply offended. Oh and by the way I was happy at the appointment of j.c. |
Cav is far from being the problem at the moment. To single him out is pretty laughable.
He had a terrific run during the festive calendar. My eyes are looking at blue eyed boy rhys and P edwards. | |
| Leader of the little gang of immature cretins. |
| |
| Match thread on 17:21 - Jan 12 with 1006 views | D_Alien |
| Match thread on 17:19 - Jan 12 by BigKindo |
Am I correct in thinking that our best run of wins came earlier in the season when cAV was injured. When is j.c. going to start picking his best 11, i.e. not necessarily scouse speakers. I have been watching Dale for over 60 years and am now considering giving up my season ticket. The Trafford Centre beckons. Any chance the Trust can organise a walk to raise funds towards paying off these clowns. Even me with a gammy leg would have a go. You don't write such comments when you've been supporting Dale through thick and thin since 1948. Unless we get a couple of wins in the next two games we are deep in the doodoo. Saturdays are tur d days and Dalewise have become tiresome and not a good reason to have a hangover on Sunday. During the week I cannot be bothered to watch the match highlights. After 60 years I am deeply offended. Oh and by the way I was happy at the appointment of j.c. |
Strong stuff BK, but entirely understandable.
Me too (apart from the trafford centre) |  |
| |
| Match thread on 17:21 - Jan 12 with 1004 views | sweetcorn |
Plus Lillis. | |
| Leader of the little gang of immature cretins. |
| |
| Match thread on 17:23 - Jan 12 with 967 views | judd |
| Match thread on 17:21 - Jan 12 by sweetcorn |
Cav is far from being the problem at the moment. To single him out is pretty laughable.
He had a terrific run during the festive calendar. My eyes are looking at blue eyed boy rhys and P edwards. |
The point is well made, though.
The best run of results came with Cav out of the team. | |
| |
| Match thread on 17:23 - Jan 12 with 965 views | rich_dale |
| Match thread on 17:21 - Jan 12 by sweetcorn |
Cav is far from being the problem at the moment. To single him out is pretty laughable.
He had a terrific run during the festive calendar. My eyes are looking at blue eyed boy rhys and P edwards. |
It's the whole defence - we haven't had a settled back 4 all season. Lillis has been the only constant. It's clear Coleman has no idea how to organise a defence properly. | | | |
| Match thread on 17:23 - Jan 12 with 964 views | sandylaner1 |
i have been a coleman supporter through thick and thin this season
but its got to the point now where if flicker became avaliable if unsuccessful on the barnsley job then we should do everything to get him back |  | | |
| Match thread on 17:23 - Jan 12 with 963 views | YouTubeDale |
| Match thread on 17:14 - Jan 12 by NotEyreClue |
Tell tale signs were there in the first half. Two sitters missed by them and one of them was a major Pedwards misjudgement. Thought we played OK second half and were the better team by a mile. Two sloppy goals defensively, especially the second one. Should have been a comfortably seen out 1-0 win. Our defense is so prone to imploding it's unbelievable. |
The sooner Coleman gets a decent defender in the better. The goals are coming straight through our middle soft under belly. Some hard wheeling and dealing needs to be done to get the right man in. The next signing will be crucial.
|  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
