| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread 18:48 - Jan 8 with 6319 views | sevenhoop |
As a 44 year season ticket holder I've seen most things but this sacking is an absolute outrage. Warnock's paying for the miracle of taking a poor team up and then having been shafted the whole pre season by briatore. Anyway other threads dealing with that.
But please Mark Hughes. Miserable, sour faced cheating bastard and I have in good authority could not be bothered to turn up for much of Fulham's training sessions. Please not him. Crap football will follow with none of the spirit engendered by Warnock. I'm stunned and gutted. [Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
|  | | |  |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 18:48 - Jan 8 with 3800 views | Northernr |
I don't understand this. Did well with Blackburn and Fulham, neither of whom have been as good since he left - clubs of similar size with a similar budget to us. |  | | |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 18:56 - Jan 8 with 3754 views | daveB |
agree with Clive, he's a very good manager. Hughes or Holloway for me. |  | | |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 18:57 - Jan 8 with 3743 views | HollowayRanger |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 18:56 - Jan 8 by daveB |
agree with Clive, he's a very good manager. Hughes or Holloway for me. |
agree im ready for this job  |  |
| |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 18:59 - Jan 8 with 3724 views | TopCat34 |
Hughes isn't a bad manager. In fact i'd be very happy with him. Who else is available? Steve Bruce. |  | | |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:00 - Jan 8 with 3713 views | Jamie |
Im off down the club shop to get my Eidur Gudjonssen shirt printed up.... |  | | |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:01 - Jan 8 with 3694 views | INFIRMARY |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:00 - Jan 8 by Jamie |
Im off down the club shop to get my Eidur Gudjonssen shirt printed up.... |
Perfectly creditable manager who has done well at all clubs , and plays the good football style |  |
| |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:02 - Jan 8 with 3679 views | wittle |
i just hope its done quick are new players really going to come if they dont even know who the manager is | | | |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:04 - Jan 8 with 3660 views | Jamie |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:01 - Jan 8 by INFIRMARY |
Perfectly creditable manager who has done well at all clubs , and plays the good football style |
Not many who saw his Blackburn side in action would have credited them with a 'good football style' | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:05 - Jan 8 with 3659 views | Hoopza_Lawski |
Not many choices but I would prefer him to Zola. |  | | |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:05 - Jan 8 with 3653 views | DorsetR |
he wouldnt win any personality contests , but a manager with a good record and experience at this level, could be a good shout. |  | | |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:06 - Jan 8 with 3638 views | Jamie |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:05 - Jan 8 by Hoopza_Lawski |
Not many choices but I would prefer him to Zola. |
Jesus, if we end up with Zola we might as well give up now. | | | |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:06 - Jan 8 with 3631 views | gazza1 |
It is a results game....we aint getting results & the performances have been average to say the least. NW sacked, on the cards.
Hughes should be able to keep us up in the Premiership & I am sure the new Manager has already been sorted. We need players quickly so I am confident we will get our man very soon. | | | |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:07 - Jan 8 with 3619 views | Ranger78 |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 18:48 - Jan 8 by Northernr |
I don't understand this. Did well with Blackburn and Fulham, neither of whom have been as good since he left - clubs of similar size with a similar budget to us. |
Warnock will always get our thanks and respect for what he's done for our club.
I think his statement shows that although he's gutted, he realised that he was out of his depth. He seems to have taken it on the chin and will remain on good terms.
We were in freefall and yesterday's result was the final nail. Something has to change. A new manager has transformed Sunderlands season... let's hope the same for us!!
Curbishly or Hughes |  | | |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:31 - Jan 8 with 3556 views | BlackCrowe |
Why not Hughes you bunch of spoilt bstards. |  |
| |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:43 - Jan 8 with 3522 views | DaiHo0p |
Won nothing anywhere he's been. rubbish manager |  | | |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:47 - Jan 8 with 3495 views | Watford_Ranger |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:43 - Jan 8 by DaiHo0p |
Won nothing anywhere he's been. rubbish manager |
If the new manager had to have won something there wouldn't be many candidates. | | | |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:50 - Jan 8 with 3460 views | tinhead |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:47 - Jan 8 by Watford_Ranger |
If the new manager had to have won something there wouldn't be many candidates. |
has he ever won an FA cup match? |  |
| |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:51 - Jan 8 with 3448 views | cheeseydane |
Rather Emlyn Hughes. |  |
| Technology advances, unfortunately humans do not. |
| |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:53 - Jan 8 with 3420 views | Gloucs_R |
Prem experience - check
Worked with smaler clubs - check
Worked on tight budgets - check
Hates Chelsea and Fulham - check
Knows some influential people - check
Played at the highest levels in the world - check
Strong personality and able to keep players in line - check
Yeah, that Mark Hughes is rubbish!  |  |
| |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:53 - Jan 8 with 3419 views | stuabd |
I'd like Hughes - good record at other clubs.
Hasn't he also worked with SWP and Barton when he was at City? |  | | |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:56 - Jan 8 with 3400 views | SurreyHoop |
I for one wouldn't object to Mark Hughes appointment. Although I'd love to know what Alan Curbishly is doing now. |  | | |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:58 - Jan 8 with 3386 views | WatfordR |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:53 - Jan 8 by stuabd |
I'd like Hughes - good record at other clubs.
Hasn't he also worked with SWP and Barton when he was at City? |
Barton, no
SWP, yes
Onuoah, yes |  | | |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:58 - Jan 8 with 3386 views | EalingRanger |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:53 - Jan 8 by stuabd |
I'd like Hughes - good record at other clubs.
Hasn't he also worked with SWP and Barton when he was at City? |
He signed Samba didn't he? Quite an interesting angle on all this.
Don't see how Curbishley is an improvement on Warnock, the guy has always struck me as something of a pathetic creature, not sure why. |  | | |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 19:59 - Jan 8 with 3360 views | TheBlob |
Say what you like about Hughes(apart from being Welsh)but he's got an eye for a decent player.Kompany,Ben Haim,Bridge,Bellamy,Shay Given,Gareth Barry,Lescott,Kolo Toure'.......
And Tevez. [Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
|  |
| |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 20:02 - Jan 8 with 3335 views | WestbourneR |
| The 'please not mark Hughes' thread on 18:48 - Jan 8 by Northernr |
I don't understand this. Did well with Blackburn and Fulham, neither of whom have been as good since he left - clubs of similar size with a similar budget to us. |
THANK YOU Northern. He has a great great record at clubs like ours, would be a brilliant appointment.
Everybody want us to sign Samba - and i know i've said it a billion times now - Hughes bought Samba for 500K! |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
