Pm's 23:45 - Jan 24 with 5905 views | morningstar | This is to the mods, and also the webmaster of this site. Are pm's really private? Because i have irrefutable evidence that they are not! | |
| | |
Pm's on 23:50 - Jan 24 with 4808 views | Darran | If you've got irrefutable evidence they are not what the fuçk are you asking for? Fuçk me another look at me post. | |
| |
Pm's on 23:56 - Jan 24 with 4800 views | morningstar |
Pm's on 23:50 - Jan 24 by Darran | If you've got irrefutable evidence they are not what the fuçk are you asking for? Fuçk me another look at me post. |
I don't do 'look at me posts' Darran unlike yourself on an almost hourly basis. It's a serious issue here. But thanks for admitting it anyway. | |
| |
Pm's on 00:10 - Jan 25 with 4774 views | morningstar |
Pm's on 23:56 - Jan 24 by morningstar | I don't do 'look at me posts' Darran unlike yourself on an almost hourly basis. It's a serious issue here. But thanks for admitting it anyway. |
And Darran goes offline! | |
| |
Pm's on 00:37 - Jan 25 with 4745 views | Humpty | What is your evidence Morning? | | | |
Pm's on 00:44 - Jan 25 with 4728 views | Lord_Bony | We do have a chuckle most days reading through them yes. | |
| |
Pm's on 10:54 - Jan 25 with 4467 views | Darran |
Pm's on 00:37 - Jan 25 by Humpty | What is your evidence Morning? |
He hasn't got any because Mods can't. FACT | |
| |
Pm's on 12:33 - Jan 25 with 4365 views | Highjack |
Pm's on 00:44 - Jan 25 by Lord_Bony | We do have a chuckle most days reading through them yes. |
Some PMs are hilarious. | |
| |
Pm's on 13:44 - Jan 25 with 4303 views | Swanjaxs | Im going to sound like a hypocrite here, but speaking as someone who has foolishly sent a pm in the heat of the moment i would support the "taking away of pm privileges for anybody found to have sent an abusive pm, or even a sine die ban from planet swans | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Pm's on 14:48 - Jan 25 with 4242 views | monmouth |
Pm's on 13:44 - Jan 25 by Swanjaxs | Im going to sound like a hypocrite here, but speaking as someone who has foolishly sent a pm in the heat of the moment i would support the "taking away of pm privileges for anybody found to have sent an abusive pm, or even a sine die ban from planet swans |
Death and a ban? Reminds me of that QI question, 'What's worse, death or Norfolk?' | |
| |
Pm's on 14:51 - Jan 25 with 4233 views | Jack_Kass | Does this site look like it would be hard for someone to read your PM? It's the only site that went backwards with an upgrade. | |
| |
Pm's on 15:25 - Jan 25 with 4199 views | morningstar |
Pm's on 10:54 - Jan 25 by Darran | He hasn't got any because Mods can't. FACT |
Did i say mods could then? i was asking the question to the mods or the webmaster ie: Phil. It's just that i've had a recent conversation via pm with someone on here, and when i went back into the conversation last night two of the pm's that person has sent to me have been deleted, though they are still listed in my inbox, they have disappeared from the conversation. Do you know how this can happen? | |
| |
Pm's on 15:51 - Jan 25 with 4142 views | swanjackal |
Pm's on 15:25 - Jan 25 by morningstar | Did i say mods could then? i was asking the question to the mods or the webmaster ie: Phil. It's just that i've had a recent conversation via pm with someone on here, and when i went back into the conversation last night two of the pm's that person has sent to me have been deleted, though they are still listed in my inbox, they have disappeared from the conversation. Do you know how this can happen? |
You are John Podesta, and I claim my £5. I'd be looking at MoscowJack for this hack. Guilty by proxy. | |
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hypocritically hypocritical ! |
| |
Pm's on 16:06 - Jan 25 with 4115 views | WarwickHunt |
Pm's on 14:51 - Jan 25 by Jack_Kass | Does this site look like it would be hard for someone to read your PM? It's the only site that went backwards with an upgrade. |
Oops - fat fingers on phone. Meant to up arrow... | | | |
Pm's on 16:08 - Jan 25 with 4109 views | Dr_Winston | No thanks. It's bad enough reading most messageboard posts without having the ability to delve into the depths of PM's too. | |
| Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. |
| |
Pm's on 16:13 - Jan 25 with 4095 views | swanjackal | Morningstar, I can't talk for this site, but elsewhere I used to post, I had whole conversations via pm deleted by a mod after that mod haad revealed their alter ego via pm to me on the website prior, and when I reminded them, they forgot they told me, and next day the whole conversation was wiped from the archive. So I imagine there is possible access for the site runner/chief mod to do so,whether they have, that is another matter. | |
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hypocritically hypocritical ! |
| |
Pm's on 16:34 - Jan 25 with 4070 views | Darran |
Pm's on 15:25 - Jan 25 by morningstar | Did i say mods could then? i was asking the question to the mods or the webmaster ie: Phil. It's just that i've had a recent conversation via pm with someone on here, and when i went back into the conversation last night two of the pm's that person has sent to me have been deleted, though they are still listed in my inbox, they have disappeared from the conversation. Do you know how this can happen? |
No I don't and I don't fuçking care either. | |
| |
Pm's on 17:24 - Jan 25 with 3986 views | DafyddHuw |
Pm's on 15:25 - Jan 25 by morningstar | Did i say mods could then? i was asking the question to the mods or the webmaster ie: Phil. It's just that i've had a recent conversation via pm with someone on here, and when i went back into the conversation last night two of the pm's that person has sent to me have been deleted, though they are still listed in my inbox, they have disappeared from the conversation. Do you know how this can happen? |
Did you ask them where they lived? | | | |
Pm's on 17:37 - Jan 25 with 3955 views | Joe_bradshaw | The ones I love are the posters who start threads on here with the title: FAO PosterJack. The text says: PM sent. WTF! If someone sends you a PM you get an email to tell you and a red thing shows up in the top left corner when you log on. What said poster is saying is - look at me, I've sent another bloke a personal message and I want you all to know about it. F**K off is it? Rant over. Sorry. | |
| |
Pm's on 17:44 - Jan 25 with 3934 views | Darran |
Pm's on 17:37 - Jan 25 by Joe_bradshaw | The ones I love are the posters who start threads on here with the title: FAO PosterJack. The text says: PM sent. WTF! If someone sends you a PM you get an email to tell you and a red thing shows up in the top left corner when you log on. What said poster is saying is - look at me, I've sent another bloke a personal message and I want you all to know about it. F**K off is it? Rant over. Sorry. |
Great post Joe just people trying to cause problems for Phil. | |
| |
Pm's on 19:22 - Jan 25 with 3849 views | morningstar |
Pm's on 16:34 - Jan 25 by Darran | No I don't and I don't fuçking care either. |
Well fvckin do one then knobchops. Remember, the original post was asked to ' the mods, and also the webmaster of this site'. You are neither, but couldn't wait to be the first too reply like some interfering old cocklewoman! | |
| |
Pm's on 19:29 - Jan 25 with 3818 views | Darran |
Pm's on 19:22 - Jan 25 by morningstar | Well fvckin do one then knobchops. Remember, the original post was asked to ' the mods, and also the webmaster of this site'. You are neither, but couldn't wait to be the first too reply like some interfering old cocklewoman! |
Fuçk off. | |
| |
Pm's on 19:31 - Jan 25 with 3815 views | morningstar |
Pm's on 17:24 - Jan 25 by DafyddHuw | Did you ask them where they lived? |
No need Dafydd bach. | |
| |
Pm's on 19:38 - Jan 25 with 3799 views | morningstar |
Pm's on 19:29 - Jan 25 by Darran | Fuçk off. |
| |
| |
| |