| Is barside the 'theoretical number two' of this website? 09:31 - Aug 7 with 1983 views | jonestones |
|  | | |  |
| Is barside the 'theoretical number two' of this website? on 10:13 - Aug 7 with 1964 views | wessex_exile |
Of course, you haven't qualified whether you mean in reality or in his own imagination, so I went for the reality option :-) |  |
| |
| Is barside the 'theoretical number two' of this website? on 10:40 - Aug 7 with 1955 views | RSCOSWORTH |
Depends what you mean by 'number two'... |  |
| |
| Is barside the 'theoretical number two' of this website? on 12:28 - Aug 7 with 1931 views | Barsidepete |
You lot have an obsession with discussing me. |  |
| |
| Is barside the 'theoretical number two' of this website? on 14:56 - Aug 7 with 1902 views | jonestones |
| Is barside the 'theoretical number two' of this website? on 10:40 - Aug 7 by RSCOSWORTH |
Depends what you mean by 'number two'... |
I hope that wasn't a toilet humour reference there RS. Nothing worse than toilet humour.
;) | | | |
| Is barside the 'theoretical number two' of this website? on 14:57 - Aug 7 with 1901 views | jonestones |
| Is barside the 'theoretical number two' of this website? on 12:28 - Aug 7 by Barsidepete |
You lot have an obsession with discussing me. |
Your lack of a proper response speaks volumes for your number two status barside. | | | |
| Is barside the 'theoretical number two' of this website? on 16:11 - Aug 7 with 1882 views | Barsidepete |
| Is barside the 'theoretical number two' of this website? on 14:57 - Aug 7 by jonestones |
Your lack of a proper response speaks volumes for your number two status barside. |
I rest my case. And you missed my point. Daniel is not here very often and he has asked us posters to keep the site moving forward.
Whether that be about football or whatever. I actually stated that as Happy was creating what seemed like arbitrary rules for being promoted, meaning I would have been first to benefit, I declined and asked that MFB weigh-in, which he succinctly did.
I'm not interested in being baited into a long discourse. But go on then. | |
| |
| Is barside the 'theoretical number two' of this website? on 20:23 - Aug 7 with 1844 views | Leadbelly |
| Is barside the 'theoretical number two' of this website? on 12:28 - Aug 7 by Barsidepete |
You lot have an obsession with discussing me. |
Please be assured that statement could not be further from the truth. |  |
| |
| Is barside the 'theoretical number two' of this website? on 23:42 - Aug 7 with 1803 views | mrhappy |
Ok folks - love and peace from here on in ! |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
