Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Puzzled by Harry's Comments 10:42 - Oct 31 with 6501 viewsolderR

In his post match interview he said Wigan's squad had greater depth than ours, but we still had five internationals on the bench.

He said no-one plays one up front these days, then said due to injuries had no choice, only one striker but has brought a second striker on for the last few minutes when trying to get a result. Didn't he play Zamora and Johnson together at the start of the season until they fell to pieces?

So he did sign Chevanton in case Austin was injured, AJ seems to be his preferred choice now he is fit again. Can't help thinking he's a missed opportunity if he'd had a bit of game time.

Nothing to do with Harry. Looking at last nights stats. We had 60% possession and they out shot us 11/9 and both teams could only manage one on target. Wonder why these teams are not in the Prem.
0
Puzzled by Harry's Comments on 23:18 - Oct 31 with 1337 viewssimmo

I agree with Hunter.

ask Beavis I get nothing Butthead

0
Puzzled by Harry's Comments on 23:25 - Oct 31 with 1325 viewsNorthernr

4/2/3/1 is definitely our best system. We're just pisballing about a bit at the moment.
0
Puzzled by Harry's Comments on 23:56 - Oct 31 with 1311 viewsdaveB

you can play any system you like, some seem to think 4-4-2 is the only attacking way to play but that nly works if you have 2 very strong strikers who can play regularly together. If Johnson goes 3 games without an injury we'll be lucky so we don't really have that option. I've not seen much of Cheverton so hard to say if he's the answer. I'm guessing as Redknapp watches him every day he's not really doing enough to force his way in.

As Jonno said if you don't get players breaking forward from midfield you don't win enough games and that has nothing to do with the starting formation imo more to do with players attitude and ambition during games you need to be very brave to make runs into the box, we don't have enough players willing to take that gamble.

to play 4-4-2 you need a team full of energy and runners willing to go from box to box, we have far too many 30+ year olds to play that way
[Post edited 1 Nov 2013 0:00]
0
Puzzled by Harry's Comments on 01:35 - Nov 1 with 1287 viewsRangersAreBack

Puzzled by Harry's Comments on 13:20 - Oct 31 by Rangersw12

True the major difference is Taarabt and Routledge are better players than Krancjar and Hoilett


Have you been smoking? Niko has been there, done that, bought the t-shirt and brought it home to auntie. A far better player than Taarabt.
0
Puzzled by Harry's Comments on 10:57 - Nov 1 with 1239 viewssmegma

Puzzled by Harry's Comments on 01:35 - Nov 1 by RangersAreBack

Have you been smoking? Niko has been there, done that, bought the t-shirt and brought it home to auntie. A far better player than Taarabt.


With all due respect, Adel and Routledge achieved promotion with some outstanding displays. Niko hasn't achieved anything yet, has had two good games at best so far while Hoilett has failed to deliver big style. No comparison.
0
Puzzled by Harry's Comments on 11:43 - Nov 1 with 1216 viewsisawqpratwcity

Puzzled by Harry's Comments on 23:25 - Oct 31 by Northernr

4/2/3/1 is definitely our best system. We're just pisballing about a bit at the moment.


"At the moment", like all f*cking season.

Poll: Deaths of Thatcher and Mandela this year: Sad or Glad?

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024