| Dhanda 21:53 - Jan 31 with 3842 views | BillyChong |
SSN reporting Dhanda was asked to take a pay cut to go out on loan to free up money for signings. No surprise he’s still here and not playing. Embarrassing. |  | | |  |
| Dhanda on 02:12 - Feb 1 with 761 views | jasper_T |
| Dhanda on 01:49 - Feb 1 by ReslovenSwan1 |
Are you happy for Swansea city to subside Dhanda's wages to go to DC United for example? Fans would go nuts. Crewe could not afford to contribute much to his wages. Dhanda could have made big splash in the USA in a less physical league more suited to his game perhaps. Arriola is highly rated over there. Mentioning slavery is just plain daft. Dhanda can go on the bench if number are short.
No one should lecture Swansea city for not honouring contracts after paying Ayew £8m for two seasons. Narsingh did practically nothing for Swansea and refused to go on loan. By all account he did not impress Potter with his graft.
Borja another that hanged around until close to the end of his contract after 3 under achieving seasons.
Winners and losers but Swansea honour their contracts treat player properly and admit their mistakes. Their generosity does not extend to paying a disproportional amount of other team's wages. |
So instead of paying a fraction (large or small) of Dhanda's wage for the rest of the season for him to play elsewhere, we're paying all his wage to not play here. It's poor economics. The player only has five months to run on his contract. There's no better offers coming in down the road. Refusing to let him go out unless he takes a paycut is pretty scummy behaviour. He quite rightly doesn't back down and now both club and player lose out.
I'd honestly rather see Ben Lloyd, Cam Congreve or Dylan Morgan get on the bench rather than Dhanda. Nothing personal but the ship has sailed, he's not suddenly going to kick on and effect games.
No one forced Swansea City to hand out these contracts. If the player doesn't turn out to be good enough the club doesn't deserve a pat on the back simply for paying what was legally due. Simply being better than Cardiff isn't anything to crow about. | | | |
| Dhanda on 11:07 - Feb 1 with 626 views | vetchonian |
| Dhanda on 02:12 - Feb 1 by jasper_T |
So instead of paying a fraction (large or small) of Dhanda's wage for the rest of the season for him to play elsewhere, we're paying all his wage to not play here. It's poor economics. The player only has five months to run on his contract. There's no better offers coming in down the road. Refusing to let him go out unless he takes a paycut is pretty scummy behaviour. He quite rightly doesn't back down and now both club and player lose out.
I'd honestly rather see Ben Lloyd, Cam Congreve or Dylan Morgan get on the bench rather than Dhanda. Nothing personal but the ship has sailed, he's not suddenly going to kick on and effect games.
No one forced Swansea City to hand out these contracts. If the player doesn't turn out to be good enough the club doesn't deserve a pat on the back simply for paying what was legally due. Simply being better than Cardiff isn't anything to crow about. |
SPot on Jasper, firstly it is amazing how the club handed out some of these contracts in the first place....even that of Fulton but to "fringe" players it seems incredulous.
I fail to understand the false economics demonstrated by the current business managers of our club...as you say makes more financial sense to loan him out but we then only pay a portion of his wages rather than now where we pick up the whole tab for him doing nothing whilst possibly also blocking a route to the bench for up and coming Acadmy players! | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
