Joe Hart 16:43 - Jul 23 with 2326 views | nanes | Could anyone tell why we didn't sign him on loan? He is okay with playing in mid table club and would be an upgrade on Fabianski. He is great shot stopper, his distribution is amazing and overall looks a lot better than fabianski, we have good backup goalkeepers in Nordfeldt and Mulder so we wouldn't have to look at the horrendous matches Fabianski play. It's beyond me that we had 4 managers and all of them choose Fabianski, pathetic. Getting Hart would be great for our defence. | | | | |
Joe Hart on 16:45 - Jul 23 with 2310 views | PozuelosSideys | There are all sorts of things wrong with this OP | |
| "Michu, Britton and Williams could have won 3-0 on their own. They wouldn't have required a keeper." | Poll: | Hattricks |
| |
Joe Hart on 16:47 - Jul 23 with 2301 views | Cooperman | His distribution is not amazing; that's the reason why Pep gave him the boot from Man City. | |
| |
Joe Hart on 16:50 - Jul 23 with 2285 views | nanes |
Joe Hart on 16:47 - Jul 23 by Cooperman | His distribution is not amazing; that's the reason why Pep gave him the boot from Man City. |
Comparing to Fabianski's, it is. | | | |
Joe Hart on 16:53 - Jul 23 with 2266 views | Cooperman |
Joe Hart on 16:50 - Jul 23 by nanes | Comparing to Fabianski's, it is. |
You're a WUM. | |
| |
Joe Hart on 16:53 - Jul 23 with 2268 views | jedijack | What's that stench of scummer emanating from this thread? | | | |
Joe Hart on 17:13 - Jul 23 with 2198 views | STID2017 | So we get rid of a keeper who has on the whole been a great servant to the club, and bring in a keeper on possibly three times his wages, who will not necessarily do much better (if any) than Fabianski. I seem to remember Hart had his critics both at City and for England. He's a brilliant keeper but not worth us breaking the bank for. Last game of the season showed why Fabianski is first choice, with the West Brom goal More important positions to fill. | |
| |
Joe Hart on 17:15 - Jul 23 with 2188 views | exiledclaseboy | We don't need a keeper. We've got loads. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Joe Hart on 18:22 - Jul 23 with 2055 views | Daggyjack | Why didn't we sign him? Because Fabianski is better. | | | |
Joe Hart on 18:40 - Jul 23 with 1987 views | jack247 | Probably for the same reason as we didn't try to activate Neymars release clause | | | |
Joe Hart on 19:23 - Jul 23 with 1911 views | ItchySphincter | Joe Hart's a but of a tw@t and not that good of a goalie. | |
| |
Joe Hart on 19:28 - Jul 23 with 1899 views | Loyal |
Joe Hart on 16:50 - Jul 23 by nanes | Comparing to Fabianski's, it is. |
I would have Fabianski in goal before him every time. | |
| Nolan sympathiser, clout expert, personal friend of Leigh Dineen, advocate and enforcer of porridge swallows.
The official inventor of the tit w@nk. | Poll: | Who should be Swansea number 1 |
| |
Joe Hart on 20:03 - Jul 23 with 1843 views | Borojack |
Joe Hart on 19:28 - Jul 23 by Loyal | I would have Fabianski in goal before him every time. |
Fabianski is head and shoulders above that tw@t | |
| |
Joe Hart on 20:19 - Jul 23 with 1823 views | UplandsJack |
Joe Hart on 20:03 - Jul 23 by Borojack | Fabianski is head and shoulders above that tw@t |
I was waiting for someone to come out with that.... fair play it didn't take long | | | |
Joe Hart on 20:38 - Jul 23 with 1797 views | deres | Maybe his distribution is better than fabianski's but have you actually seen any torino match? They have concede 66 goals and Hart played 36 of 38 games, Torino don't have the best defence but it's a lot better than our defence and we have lost 70 goals so only four goals difference, he is very error prone and this year he was at fault of around 10 goals and how many fabianski was at fault? 3 or 4 times. This thread is bullshit | | | |
Joe Hart on 20:55 - Jul 23 with 1777 views | JackSomething |
Joe Hart on 20:38 - Jul 23 by deres | Maybe his distribution is better than fabianski's but have you actually seen any torino match? They have concede 66 goals and Hart played 36 of 38 games, Torino don't have the best defence but it's a lot better than our defence and we have lost 70 goals so only four goals difference, he is very error prone and this year he was at fault of around 10 goals and how many fabianski was at fault? 3 or 4 times. This thread is bullshit |
He also let in some absolute howlers for them, which is his trademark (see Euro 2016 for further evidence). It says something that Torino didn't want him back and there wasn't exactly a strong market for his services this summer. Not a bad keeper, but nowhere as good as he thinks he is. Considering the relative transfer fees and wages, Fabianski is a far more suitable player for us. Thanks anyway Joe. Edit: Sorry Deres, didn't mean to quote you. [Post edited 23 Jul 2017 20:59]
| |
| You know, Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help. |
| |
Joe Hart on 03:25 - Jul 25 with 1655 views | Wanderer | AH the Euros, mouthing off in the tunnel blah blah f****g blah, then letting GB slide one in past him from from a thousand years, p**s off you muff. | | | |
Joe Hart on 03:39 - Jul 25 with 1646 views | Swan91 | For the price difference between Fabianski and Hart... there is no point. Fab is a really good keeper but last season the defence was pretty bad so made him look worse than he actually is... Hart looked decent but was in a Champions league side.. so made him look better than he actually is. | | | |
Joe Hart on 23:01 - Jul 25 with 1455 views | Rancid | He'll want to play for England still which is enough for it to be a stupid idea [Post edited 25 Jul 2017 23:01]
| | | |
Joe Hart on 23:37 - Jul 25 with 1406 views | builthjack | His distribution is poor. His reading of the game is poor. Very overated keeper is Hart. Fabianski every day of the week. | |
| Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.
|
| |
| |