By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Let's hope the Trust members follow suit in what seems to be a pretty closed book of rhetoric on their part to sway decision one way rather than the other.
Swexit poll result: 37 votes for legal action 12 against on 11:36 - Jul 3 by Jack_y_Jwc
The trust aren't blatantly lying though. They're just defending their recommendation, which is fair enough.
What does surprise me though is how every member of the trust board is behind the decision to accept this offer, surely one of them must be backing the litigation route.
Not accusing them of lying.
They should be completely neutral when explaining the situation and the results of each action. They should not be trying to sway votes by using language and selective pros and cons. It should be the members free choice.
Swexit poll result: 37 votes for legal action 12 against on 11:41 - Jul 3 by felixstowe_jack
There were only two choices in the referendum
Stay in the EU Leave the EU
Seems pretty simple to me you either
vote to stay in the EU and be governed by unelected commissioners and the European Court of Justice has the final say on any laws.
Or vote to leave and by governed by elected MPs in a UK parliament with the British Supreme Court having the final say on UK law.
There is no such thing as half in or half out, hard remain or soft remain, hard brexit or soft brexit. It was a simple choice.
And the only two real choices here are legal action or take the deal.
It isn't as simple or complex as brexit depending on your understanding or point of view. The similarities between the understanding levels of the voters and the propaganda surrounding it is striking.