| Swans Trust Meeting 19:37 - Dec 4 with 19895 views | Landore_Jack |
Don't forget there is a trust meeting tomorrow at 7:30 pm at the Liberty Stadium. |  |
| |  |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 20:43 - Dec 5 with 2842 views | swancity |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 19:51 - Dec 5 by max936 |
Still being assessed dear me. |
Exactly. Six months down the line and still nothing decided. Now come on that's enough time to have considered all options and to make a decision. And implement it. Just get on with it fellas. |  |
| Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day |
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 20:47 - Dec 5 with 2799 views | swancity |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 20:04 - Dec 5 by waynekerr55 |
I don't know Dai personally, but I don't think you get to become a partner in a law firm like he has on the back of emotive decisions.
Add to the fact that he's a dyed in the wool Jack, I think if anything he'd be more inclined to go for legal action to protect the long term future of the club |
Disagree. Completely. It needed fresh input from a top firm. And thus ensuring that there aren't any possible conflicts of interest or personality clashes with people who have past connections. It's all too incestuous. Get him out of the equation now if a decision hasn't been made yet. | |
| Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day |
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 20:48 - Dec 5 with 2783 views | Watchman |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 20:43 - Dec 5 by swancity |
Exactly. Six months down the line and still nothing decided. Now come on that's enough time to have considered all options and to make a decision. And implement it. Just get on with it fellas. |
devils advocate question here
what if the Trust Board decide to go nuclear and then lost what would be the opinion i.e waste of money, stupid , should have kept the money for a rainy day
Surely the last thing we want is to drag the name of OUR football club into the dirt even further after the behaviour of former shareholders
If as it appears things have not worked out well off the field then the only thing left is for time to do its bidding and those that behaved as they did will be judged accordingly |  |
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 20:53 - Dec 5 with 2737 views | swancity |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 20:48 - Dec 5 by Watchman |
devils advocate question here
what if the Trust Board decide to go nuclear and then lost what would be the opinion i.e waste of money, stupid , should have kept the money for a rainy day
Surely the last thing we want is to drag the name of OUR football club into the dirt even further after the behaviour of former shareholders
If as it appears things have not worked out well off the field then the only thing left is for time to do its bidding and those that behaved as they did will be judged accordingly |
I'm in no position to say what they should have done. The Solicitors though should by now have decided what action is required one way or the other. | |
| Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day |
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 20:58 - Dec 5 with 2684 views | Private_Partz |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 20:53 - Dec 5 by swancity |
I'm in no position to say what they should have done. The Solicitors though should by now have decided what action is required one way or the other. |
IT is the balance if probability surely. If the legal advisers think the Trust had a very good case then they should go for it. If it Is in diubt then the cautious approach is best.
Nothing is certain in Law but if the odds are stacked in your favour you cannot be damned for trying. |  |
| You have mission in life to hold out your hand,
To help the other guy out,
Help your fellow man.
Stan Ridgway
|
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:05 - Dec 5 with 2622 views | monmouth |
As I'm reading it from the EP feed, the Trust have been stitched up tighter than a nun's chuff. Even down to the scum protecting their privileges. If legal action was in any way clear cut it would surely be obvious by now. I fear what we are seeing is the death throes of any vestige of the fans involvement other than as an ignored and outvoted shareholder. It hurts me a lot to write that.
As always I hope someone pulls a rabbit out of the hat, but I wouldn't lump on. |  |
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:05 - Dec 5 with 2618 views | swancity |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 20:58 - Dec 5 by Private_Partz |
IT is the balance if probability surely. If the legal advisers think the Trust had a very good case then they should go for it. If it Is in diubt then the cautious approach is best.
Nothing is certain in Law but if the odds are stacked in your favour you cannot be damned for trying. |
Precisely. But decide. And then do it. Do something. | |
| Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day |
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:10 - Dec 5 with 2553 views | waynekerr55 |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 20:47 - Dec 5 by swancity |
Disagree. Completely. It needed fresh input from a top firm. And thus ensuring that there aren't any possible conflicts of interest or personality clashes with people who have past connections. It's all too incestuous. Get him out of the equation now if a decision hasn't been made yet. |
From a top firm? You do realise how expensive Russell Square is, don't you?
It appears that the best recourse is going balls in on the previous shareholders agreement and taking those cūnts for every penny we can, and ensuring they face criminal action as a result of their deeds. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:14 - Dec 5 with 2508 views | swancity |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:10 - Dec 5 by waynekerr55 |
From a top firm? You do realise how expensive Russell Square is, don't you?
It appears that the best recourse is going balls in on the previous shareholders agreement and taking those cūnts for every penny we can, and ensuring they face criminal action as a result of their deeds. |
It needs fresh and totally independent advice from a top firm. Yes I do. Say good bye to Little once and for all. | |
| Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day |
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:19 - Dec 5 with 2465 views | waynekerr55 |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:14 - Dec 5 by swancity |
It needs fresh and totally independent advice from a top firm. Yes I do. Say good bye to Little once and for all. |
It is a top law firm
He's a specialist sports lawyer
He's a die hard fan (not a plastic cūnt like the former owners)
The law isn't clear cut as everyone wants it to be | |
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:22 - Dec 5 with 2403 views | Flashberryjack |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:05 - Dec 5 by monmouth |
As I'm reading it from the EP feed, the Trust have been stitched up tighter than a nun's chuff. Even down to the scum protecting their privileges. If legal action was in any way clear cut it would surely be obvious by now. I fear what we are seeing is the death throes of any vestige of the fans involvement other than as an ignored and outvoted shareholder. It hurts me a lot to write that.
As always I hope someone pulls a rabbit out of the hat, but I wouldn't lump on. |
Maybe some are reluctant to go down the legal action road, for fear of having their dirty washing hung out in the public domain.
It seems our club has been run like a cesspit, and if your involved in club activities it's difficult not to get splattered with some sh*t. |  |
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:23 - Dec 5 with 2390 views | blueytheblue |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:19 - Dec 5 by waynekerr55 |
It is a top law firm
He's a specialist sports lawyer
He's a die hard fan (not a plastic cūnt like the former owners)
The law isn't clear cut as everyone wants it to be |
Innit.
I'm sure the Trust could find a law firm who would give the advice many want "sue! sue! sue!".
Doesn't make it the right advice. | |
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:25 - Dec 5 with 2360 views | swancity |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:19 - Dec 5 by waynekerr55 |
It is a top law firm
He's a specialist sports lawyer
He's a die hard fan (not a plastic cūnt like the former owners)
The law isn't clear cut as everyone wants it to be |
It's the die hard fan bit that's the problem though. That's not a positive, it's a definite issue that I wouldn't mind betting is contributing to the procrastination. | |
| Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day |
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:27 - Dec 5 with 2331 views | max936 |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:05 - Dec 5 by monmouth |
As I'm reading it from the EP feed, the Trust have been stitched up tighter than a nun's chuff. Even down to the scum protecting their privileges. If legal action was in any way clear cut it would surely be obvious by now. I fear what we are seeing is the death throes of any vestige of the fans involvement other than as an ignored and outvoted shareholder. It hurts me a lot to write that.
As always I hope someone pulls a rabbit out of the hat, but I wouldn't lump on. |
If that's anywhere close to the truth then it may suggest that Huw Cooze knew what was going on along if that's the case then its shocking that the other's on the Trust didn't know or realise what was going on.
We don't know enough to know one way or the other truth be known.
If the sellouts had any lasting interest in the clubs long term future, why stitch the Trust up.
They've got to get the fukout and now, this ain't gonna end well for them no matter how many body guards they got. |  |
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:27 - Dec 5 with 2323 views | Smellyplumz |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:22 - Dec 5 by Flashberryjack |
Maybe some are reluctant to go down the legal action road, for fear of having their dirty washing hung out in the public domain.
It seems our club has been run like a cesspit, and if your involved in club activities it's difficult not to get splattered with some sh*t. |
That's definitely a possibility, personally and I could very well be wrong but I don't think it will go legal, I just don't see it. |  |
|
""Although I cannot promise or predict the future, I can guarantee one thing - the current board of directors will always fight, as we have done over the last 12 years, to work together as one with the Supporters Trust to make 100% sure that Swansea City football club remains the number one priority in all our thoughts and in every decision we make." | | Poll: | Huw Jenkins |
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:29 - Dec 5 with 1738 views | waynekerr55 |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:25 - Dec 5 by swancity |
It's the die hard fan bit that's the problem though. That's not a positive, it's a definite issue that I wouldn't mind betting is contributing to the procrastination. |
Any reason why?
I'd wager he has the club's interest at heart. I understand there's been much discussion with barristers who specialise in situations like this.
Better to clinically review rather than dive in with both feet. | |
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:34 - Dec 5 with 1696 views | swancity |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:29 - Dec 5 by waynekerr55 |
Any reason why?
I'd wager he has the club's interest at heart. I understand there's been much discussion with barristers who specialise in situations like this.
Better to clinically review rather than dive in with both feet. |
Six months to review and decide and recommend what action to take. Yet nothing. No advice. Nothing. Meanwhile our team is sinking like the Titanic.
Don't be naive. He will have his own interests at the top of his list of priorities. I'm certain that he shouldn't be involved on this. | |
| Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day |
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:36 - Dec 5 with 1675 views | Watchman |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:22 - Dec 5 by Flashberryjack |
Maybe some are reluctant to go down the legal action road, for fear of having their dirty washing hung out in the public domain.
It seems our club has been run like a cesspit, and if your involved in club activities it's difficult not to get splattered with some sh*t. |
yup and also there would a lot more money on one side than the other with no guarantee of winning | |
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:38 - Dec 5 with 1655 views | max936 |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:22 - Dec 5 by Flashberryjack |
Maybe some are reluctant to go down the legal action road, for fear of having their dirty washing hung out in the public domain.
It seems our club has been run like a cesspit, and if your involved in club activities it's difficult not to get splattered with some sh*t. |
I really hope that isn't the case, but who knows very sad if it the case though. | |
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:38 - Dec 5 with 1652 views | Loyal |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:27 - Dec 5 by max936 |
If that's anywhere close to the truth then it may suggest that Huw Cooze knew what was going on along if that's the case then its shocking that the other's on the Trust didn't know or realise what was going on.
We don't know enough to know one way or the other truth be known.
If the sellouts had any lasting interest in the clubs long term future, why stitch the Trust up.
They've got to get the fukout and now, this ain't gonna end well for them no matter how many body guards they got. |
Tenko would like it known by text message he was and never will be a body guard. 👠|  |
| Nolan sympathiser, clout expert, personal friend of Leigh Dineen, advocate and enforcer of porridge swallows.
The official inventor of the tit w@nk. | | Poll: | Who should be Swansea number 1 |
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:39 - Dec 5 with 1644 views | Wingstandwood |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:27 - Dec 5 by max936 |
If that's anywhere close to the truth then it may suggest that Huw Cooze knew what was going on along if that's the case then its shocking that the other's on the Trust didn't know or realise what was going on.
We don't know enough to know one way or the other truth be known.
If the sellouts had any lasting interest in the clubs long term future, why stitch the Trust up.
They've got to get the fukout and now, this ain't gonna end well for them no matter how many body guards they got. |
Having to attend a football match with bodyguards would sort of send a message that they're in rather a precarious position? But there again they're so greedy for VIP status, hospitality, privileges, access to exclusive personal acquaintance/to mix with rich big business contacts....... and to mix with the famous they'd do absolutely anything.
The dirty, despicable, grubby, shameless little deal they struck to have a seat in their beloved directors box (after their treachery) just shows what self-serving filth they really are. The hatred will grow and it wont help the club because many won't renew season tickets knowing those scumbags are taking the p#ss . Even Petty had the decency to f#ck off! |  |
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:39 - Dec 5 with 1642 views | waynekerr55 |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:34 - Dec 5 by swancity |
Six months to review and decide and recommend what action to take. Yet nothing. No advice. Nothing. Meanwhile our team is sinking like the Titanic.
Don't be naive. He will have his own interests at the top of his list of priorities. I'm certain that he shouldn't be involved on this. |
Well we shall agree to disagree then sir. | |
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:39 - Dec 5 with 1639 views | barry_island |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 20:07 - Dec 5 by Loyal |
What as ?
A waiter from Morgan's hotel ? |
He was there at the back of the room and was thanked for his efforts by a number who were present. It would have been interesting to hear him speak, sadly he did not ask for the microphone. | |
| Swansea City, THE Austerity Club. |
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:41 - Dec 5 with 1609 views | Loyal |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:39 - Dec 5 by Wingstandwood |
Having to attend a football match with bodyguards would sort of send a message that they're in rather a precarious position? But there again they're so greedy for VIP status, hospitality, privileges, access to exclusive personal acquaintance/to mix with rich big business contacts....... and to mix with the famous they'd do absolutely anything.
The dirty, despicable, grubby, shameless little deal they struck to have a seat in their beloved directors box (after their treachery) just shows what self-serving filth they really are. The hatred will grow and it wont help the club because many won't renew season tickets knowing those scumbags are taking the p#ss . Even Petty had the decency to f#ck off! |
Petty did have let's say some fairly convincing reasons to do so. | |
| Nolan sympathiser, clout expert, personal friend of Leigh Dineen, advocate and enforcer of porridge swallows.
The official inventor of the tit w@nk. | | Poll: | Who should be Swansea number 1 |
| |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:43 - Dec 5 with 1596 views | Smellyplumz |
| Swans Trust Meeting on 21:27 - Dec 5 by max936 |
If that's anywhere close to the truth then it may suggest that Huw Cooze knew what was going on along if that's the case then its shocking that the other's on the Trust didn't know or realise what was going on.
We don't know enough to know one way or the other truth be known.
If the sellouts had any lasting interest in the clubs long term future, why stitch the Trust up.
They've got to get the fukout and now, this ain't gonna end well for them no matter how many body guards they got. |
Of course Coozy knew, why wouldn't he. | |
|
""Although I cannot promise or predict the future, I can guarantee one thing - the current board of directors will always fight, as we have done over the last 12 years, to work together as one with the Supporters Trust to make 100% sure that Swansea City football club remains the number one priority in all our thoughts and in every decision we make." | | Poll: | Huw Jenkins |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
