Is there another reason we didn't see much of Ross Stewart. 09:52 - May 28 with 1674 views | GRIM | I understand that there were clauses in the Ross Stewart contract suggesting that additional payments over & above the 8M transfer fee that would have to be paid based on appearances / performances of RS. That may be why he was an unused sub. But we'll never know ???. Be interesting to see how he performs in Premier Lge having only played a handful of Championship games at the age of 26. | | | | |
Is there another reason we didn't see much of Ross Stewart. on 09:55 - May 28 with 1645 views | Centurion | a strange one. Is he really fully fit? Also will Larios be ready? | | | |
Is there another reason we didn't see much of Ross Stewart. on 09:57 - May 28 with 1639 views | GRIM |
Is there another reason we didn't see much of Ross Stewart. on 09:55 - May 28 by Centurion | a strange one. Is he really fully fit? Also will Larios be ready? |
Forget Larios, bring back Perraud | | | |
Is there another reason we didn't see much of Ross Stewart. on 09:59 - May 28 with 1633 views | SaintNick | I would doubt that the extra payment would be as low as 5 or 6 games which would have been the most he could have played if he had played in the last two games. Also if it was 5 then I would imagine they would not have used him in either the game at leeds which was a dead rubber, or the game at West Brom when we were managing the game to a draw | |
| Satisfying The Bloodlust Of The Masses In Peacetime |
| |
Is there another reason we didn't see much of Ross Stewart. on 10:04 - May 28 with 1621 views | Block8 | As far as I'm aware the only extra payment was £2,000,000 if we were promoted and that was regardless of appearances? | | | |
Is there another reason we didn't see much of Ross Stewart. on 12:03 - May 28 with 1431 views | PatfromPoole |
Is there another reason we didn't see much of Ross Stewart. on 09:57 - May 28 by GRIM | Forget Larios, bring back Perraud |
Seconded. | |
| |
| |