Forum | any changes by Dale50 | Not In My Lifetime

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

any changes 11:54 - Dec 29 with 2468 views

Would anybody like to see any changes are to go with an 3 consecutive same team. ?Personally i would like to go with the same starting 11..

any changes on 12:06 - Dec 29 with 2421 views

ChaffRAFC

I'd like to see Gillam out of the 11 and maybe Inman or Dooley in (if fit). Gillam has offered nothing last two games for me really.

Aside from that I wouldn't want to see many more changes.

That said, we've played the same team twice in a week so I'm fully expecting 4 or 5 changes to the lineup today for rotation purposes. Suspect Perkins may come in for Adshead at least.

If I hadn't seen such riches, I could live with being poor

any changes on 12:11 - Dec 29 with 2401 views

SaxonDale

any changes on 12:06 - Dec 29 by ChaffRAFC
I'd like to see Gillam out of the 11 and maybe Inman or Dooley in (if fit). Gillam has offered nothing last two games for me really. Aside from that I wouldn't want to see many more changes. That said, we've played the same team twice in a week so I'm fully expecting 4 or 5 changes to the lineup today for rotation purposes. Suspect Perkins may come in for Adshead at least.

I’d agree with that. We need to keep things fresh but still retain the blueprint for what’s made us win the last few games. If the fresh legs aren’t capable of playing the ball on the floor I’d rather us stick with the same team. The system we’ve used the last few games certainly looks like it will cause teams trouble, we just need consistency playing it.

any changes on 12:21 - Dec 29 with 2375 views

TVOS1907

any changes on 12:06 - Dec 29 by ChaffRAFC
I'd like to see Gillam out of the 11 and maybe Inman or Dooley in (if fit). Gillam has offered nothing last two games for me really. Aside from that I wouldn't want to see many more changes. That said, we've played the same team twice in a week so I'm fully expecting 4 or 5 changes to the lineup today for rotation purposes. Suspect Perkins may come in for Adshead at least.

I also noticed Matt Done limping about at the end of the Blackpool game, although it could have been just a slight knock.

When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf?

any changes on 12:39 - Dec 29 with 2308 views

boromat

I think Adshead will play and is one of the reasons he came off quite early the last game. Agree with Gillam maybe losing his place.

Maybe today McGahey and Cannon come in fresh legged for one last 90 minutes of service?

Poll:

What are we more excited for?

any changes on 12:45 - Dec 29 with 2306 views

dawlishdale

I don't see Gillam as being ready for the first team yet.

I'd like Sam Hart to play if fit (can't recall much injury news on him)

McGahey to play if not already sold

any changes on 13:03 - Dec 29 with 2267 views

isitme

It depends on how fresh the players are. Inman starting for Gillam is an obvious one. I'd like Adshead to start with Camps and Rathbone as that line up has a good balance to it. Camps to hold, Rathbone's running and Adshead's creativity.

Hart coming back would be a bonus as his delivery is much better. Hopefully his shoulder is better.

If deals are agreed I cannot see Cannon or McGahey featuring at all.

any changes on 21:00 - Dec 29 with 2029 views

albert_park

any changes on 13:03 - Dec 29 by isitme

If McGahey has to all intents and purposes been sold, why does Hill have him on the bench and go through the motions of warming up on the pitch. Embarassing!

any changes on 21:35 - Dec 29 with 1963 views

smaclad1

any changes on 21:00 - Dec 29 by albert_park
If McGahey has to all intents and purposes been sold, why does Hill have him on the bench and go through the motions of warming up on the pitch. Embarassing!

"If" - it's a bigger word than it looks.

Also, if Andrew has to all intents and purposes been sold, why does Hill have him on the bench and going through the motions when he's on the pitch.

any changes on 21:38 - Dec 29 with 1941 views

fitzochris

any changes on 21:35 - Dec 29 by smaclad1
"If" - it's a bigger word than it looks. Also, if Andrew has to all intents and purposes been sold, why does Hill have him on the bench and going through the motions when he's on the pitch.

Who said Andrew has been “sold”?

Blog:

Rochdale 2018/19 part three: Getting points on the board

any changes on 21:40 - Dec 29 with 1932 views

rochdaleriddler

any changes on 21:35 - Dec 29 by smaclad1
"If" - it's a bigger word than it looks. Also, if Andrew has to all intents and purposes been sold, why does Hill have him on the bench and going through the motions when he's on the pitch.

Maybe all the squad , including management has been sold, judging by the effort and care on display today

Poll:

Will you download and use the contract tracing App being launched by the Govt

any changes on 22:30 - Dec 29 with 1868 views

smaclad1

any changes on 21:38 - Dec 29 by fitzochris
Who said Andrew has been “sold”?

Odd you haven't taken albert to task for exactly the same post about McGahey. You know the 'rumours' about both players - unless you know more about the McGahey situation than you're letting on

any changes on 10:30 - Dec 30 with 1731 views

Yorkshire_Dale

any changes on 21:35 - Dec 29 by smaclad1
"If" - it's a bigger word than it looks. Also, if Andrew has to all intents and purposes been sold, why does Hill have him on the bench and going through the motions when he's on the pitch.

That is an apt description of Calvin's performance (and the others) yesterday Smacker...."going through the motions".......

any changes on 11:02 - Dec 30 with 1684 views

albert_park

Not quite the same about Calvin as he usually gets minutes on the pitch. Harrison was our best player and then gets dropped for reasons only known to Hill.

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread