| Ash on 21:51 - Aug 2 with 2688 views | jasper_T |
Really hope we don't end up stuck with a sulky player when Everton look elsewhere. |  | |  |
| Ash on 21:54 - Aug 2 with 2651 views | vetchonian |
| Ash on 21:49 - Aug 2 by londonlisa2001 |
How interesting.
Seems like 'Mr Swansea' had negotiated a deal before the club had accepted a bid then.
Agent tells the media it's happening. Club turn bid down.
Oh dear.
Well done Huw. If he wants to go for this 'new challenge' (aka more money) then make them pay what we want. Otherwise, he's two more years.
Increased bid tomorrow? |
It's Moralee wrong | |
| |
| Ash on 21:58 - Aug 2 with 2576 views | WarwickHunt |
| Ash on 21:49 - Aug 2 by londonlisa2001 |
How interesting.
Seems like 'Mr Swansea' had negotiated a deal before the club had accepted a bid then.
Agent tells the media it's happening. Club turn bid down.
Oh dear.
Well done Huw. If he wants to go for this 'new challenge' (aka more money) then make them pay what we want. Otherwise, he's two more years.
Increased bid tomorrow? |
Probably on the money there, Lis.
However, I can't see them going above £10m so we could be cutting our noses off...
Not to mention a sulky captain. |  | | |
| Ash on 22:00 - Aug 2 with 2547 views | dickythorpe |
£11million and I'll drive him there myself |  | | |
| Ash on 22:02 - Aug 2 with 2503 views | jack247 |
| Ash on 21:42 - Aug 2 by AnotherJohn |
A lot of pundits were saying that £10M was underwhelming - regardless of age. There was more in that deal for Everton than for us. At a higher price the decision might be different. |
'Not looking to sell him and therefore we have turned down the offer currently on the table'
Kind of tells it's own story. We have avoided 'not for sale'.
Either way, it looked like we were selling him for £10m an hour ago. From that position I'd be happy to either keep him or sell him for more. Provided it goes towards recruitment | | | |
| Ash on 22:04 - Aug 2 with 2482 views | Dyfnant |
| Ash on 22:00 - Aug 2 by dickythorpe |
£11million and I'll drive him there myself |
Footballers might be extravagant mate but he could probably get a taxi for £200 |  |
| |
| Ash on 22:09 - Aug 2 with 2426 views | blaine_scfc |
Strange one this. He wouldn't have been discussing terms with them unless a fee had been agreed. I know football clubs don't always play by the rules, but I can't see Ash going behind the clubs back, especially as it has now gone public, we would be making complaints.
Either we have changed the goalposts at the last minute, or Everton have. If the reports are correct and he's looking for a new challenge, get the £15 million and reinvest in squad. Probably not as straight forward however as I assume they could get Fonte for cheaper. [Post edited 2 Aug 2016 22:17]
|  | | |
| Ash on 22:16 - Aug 2 with 2380 views | AnotherJohn |
| Ash on 22:09 - Aug 2 by blaine_scfc |
Strange one this. He wouldn't have been discussing terms with them unless a fee had been agreed. I know football clubs don't always play by the rules, but I can't see Ash going behind the clubs back, especially as it has now gone public, we would be making complaints.
Either we have changed the goalposts at the last minute, or Everton have. If the reports are correct and he's looking for a new challenge, get the £15 million and reinvest in squad. Probably not as straight forward however as I assume they could get Fonte for cheaper. [Post edited 2 Aug 2016 22:17]
|
Reports say that Southampton are offering Fonte an improved contract. I think a lot on the board over-estimate the appeal of £10M in the new post-TV deal environment. Everton have been knocked back on a few deals if you look at various Toffees websites. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Ash on 22:21 - Aug 2 with 2316 views | stid |
Personally think the board have done that just to show to us fans they have not planned to sell...Just like the did with Ayew | | | |
| Ash on 22:22 - Aug 2 with 2304 views | Dyfnant |
Everton probably have man city chasing them with the £50M cheque for Stones and Everton want the replacement in ready. Good position for us to squeeze a few million more | |
| |
| Ash on 22:28 - Aug 2 with 2237 views | Griffting |
| Ash on 21:35 - Aug 2 by pencoedjack |
From the Everton forum
'They are John Stoneing us"
Fuk em |
I had a quick glance on their forum to see what they made of the deal. Gone right up their own arse since coming into a bit of money haven't they. |  | | |
| Ash on 22:36 - Aug 2 with 2160 views | somersetsimon |
| Ash on 22:09 - Aug 2 by blaine_scfc |
Strange one this. He wouldn't have been discussing terms with them unless a fee had been agreed. I know football clubs don't always play by the rules, but I can't see Ash going behind the clubs back, especially as it has now gone public, we would be making complaints.
Either we have changed the goalposts at the last minute, or Everton have. If the reports are correct and he's looking for a new challenge, get the £15 million and reinvest in squad. Probably not as straight forward however as I assume they could get Fonte for cheaper. [Post edited 2 Aug 2016 22:17]
|
Who said he had been discussing terms? |  | | |
| Ash on 22:39 - Aug 2 with 2134 views | somersetsimon |
So the 'dramatic twist' is that the story the same news outlet published yesterday had no truth behind it. | | | |
| Ash on 22:40 - Aug 2 with 2112 views | morningstar |
| Ash on 22:36 - Aug 2 by somersetsimon |
Who said he had been discussing terms? |
Glad i'm not the only one who thought that! |  |
| |
| Ash on 22:42 - Aug 2 with 2076 views | Starsky |
I DONT CARE ANY MORE.
Feck off Huw, Feck off Ash |  |
| It's just the internet, init. |
| |
| Ash on 22:57 - Aug 2 with 1959 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Ash on 21:58 - Aug 2 by WarwickHunt |
Probably on the money there, Lis.
However, I can't see them going above £10m so we could be cutting our noses off...
Not to mention a sulky captain. |
I think we're just sending a message to the agents - we won't be backed into a corner. May be a first sign of this new 'financial muscle' .
He'll go. The deal will be sweetened a bit and he'll go.
A powerful message though. We're prepared to call his bluff and keep him for two years if necessary and give up £10m.
Very strong statement from the new owners - we wouldn't have done it before. This is exactly the way clubs like Southampton have behaved for ages, which is why they get more money for their players. [Post edited 2 Aug 2016 22:58]
| | | |
| Ash on 22:59 - Aug 2 with 1936 views | pencoedjack |
| Ash on 22:28 - Aug 2 by Griffting |
I had a quick glance on their forum to see what they made of the deal. Gone right up their own arse since coming into a bit of money haven't they. |
Thought exactly the same
1 poster hold them (us) to ransom that's what big clubs do |  | | |
| Ash on 22:59 - Aug 2 with 1937 views | morningstar |
| Ash on 22:42 - Aug 2 by Starsky |
I DONT CARE ANY MORE.
Feck off Huw, Feck off Ash |
 I'm shocked at you Starsk. In Huw we trust, and Ash is the pure embodiment of the club as we know it! | |
| |
| Ash on 23:04 - Aug 2 with 1894 views | ItchySphincter |
| Ash on 21:31 - Aug 2 by Darran |
He's got another two seasons and that's worth more than £10million. |
BoIIocks. 10M for Ash we're mugging them big time. |  |
| |
| Ash on 23:34 - Aug 2 with 1828 views | WarwickHunt |
| Ash on 22:57 - Aug 2 by londonlisa2001 |
I think we're just sending a message to the agents - we won't be backed into a corner. May be a first sign of this new 'financial muscle' .
He'll go. The deal will be sweetened a bit and he'll go.
A powerful message though. We're prepared to call his bluff and keep him for two years if necessary and give up £10m.
Very strong statement from the new owners - we wouldn't have done it before. This is exactly the way clubs like Southampton have behaved for ages, which is why they get more money for their players. [Post edited 2 Aug 2016 22:58]
|
None of them had to buy 4 packs of candles for their birthday cakes though...
Risky business. | | | |
| Ash on 00:00 - Aug 3 with 1732 views | Loyal |
| Ash on 22:59 - Aug 2 by morningstar |
I'm shocked at you Starsk. In Huw we trust, and Ash is the pure embodiment of the club as we know it! |
So was Bob Latchford I'm told, and Robbie James, then Mark Harris, keith walker, Lee trundle etc etc etc.
Just people paid to represent our club, end. |  |
| Nolan sympathiser, clout expert, personal friend of Leigh Dineen, advocate and enforcer of porridge swallows.
The official inventor of the tit w@nk. | | Poll: | Who should be Swansea number 1 |
| |
| Ash on 00:14 - Aug 3 with 1679 views | morningstar |
| Ash on 00:00 - Aug 3 by Loyal |
So was Bob Latchford I'm told, and Robbie James, then Mark Harris, keith walker, Lee trundle etc etc etc.
Just people paid to represent our club, end. |
So to you Robbie James was just a paid person who represented our club ye? Tut tut, bad call. | |
| |
| Ash on 00:32 - Aug 3 with 1628 views | Loyal |
| Ash on 00:14 - Aug 3 by morningstar |
So to you Robbie James was just a paid person who represented our club ye? Tut tut, bad call. |
I only saw him around the time he returned to us under Sharpe, never really set my juices flowing. | |
| Nolan sympathiser, clout expert, personal friend of Leigh Dineen, advocate and enforcer of porridge swallows.
The official inventor of the tit w@nk. | | Poll: | Who should be Swansea number 1 |
| |
| Ash on 01:00 - Aug 3 with 1557 views | morningstar |
| Ash on 00:32 - Aug 3 by Loyal |
I only saw him around the time he returned to us under Sharpe, never really set my juices flowing. |
I only saw Mel Nurse, Herbie Williams and Ivor Allchurch in their twilight years. All club legends along with Robbie. But i guess you think they couldn't lace Marilyn Crofts petticoats eh?  | |
| |
| Ash on 01:03 - Aug 3 with 1542 views | Loyal |
| Ash on 01:00 - Aug 3 by morningstar |
I only saw Mel Nurse, Herbie Williams and Ivor Allchurch in their twilight years. All club legends along with Robbie. But i guess you think they couldn't lace Marilyn Crofts petticoats eh? |
I have it on good authority she possesses a penis. | |
| Nolan sympathiser, clout expert, personal friend of Leigh Dineen, advocate and enforcer of porridge swallows.
The official inventor of the tit w@nk. | | Poll: | Who should be Swansea number 1 |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
