| Rangel? 21:51 - Oct 19 with 1819 views | deanscfc |
Was there a reason he started? - genuine question... unable to go and watching in a pub with no commentary. |  | | |  |
| Rangel? on 21:53 - Oct 19 with 1801 views | jennierlim |
lol crazy! rangel time has been and gone. naughton is far better. | | | |
| Rangel? on 22:07 - Oct 19 with 1724 views | LeonisGod |
Yes. Because he showed more against Spurs than Naughton has all season. Deserved to keep his place and he was most definitely not our problem tonight. |  | | |
| Rangel? on 22:29 - Oct 19 with 1656 views | deanscfc |
| Rangel? on 22:07 - Oct 19 by LeonisGod |
Yes. Because he showed more against Spurs than Naughton has all season. Deserved to keep his place and he was most definitely not our problem tonight. |
If there was no injury to Naughton then that is a poor decision from Monk. Regardless of Naughton's form, Rangel has beeen off the pace for years now. Good servant and bench player but when he is starting then that must get the opposition excited. Shows weakness. | | | |
| Rangel? on 22:34 - Oct 19 with 1613 views | Dr_Winston |
Rangel was one of our better players tonight I thought. Certainly the best of the starters, although that's not saying much. |  |
| Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. |
| |
| Rangel? on 22:35 - Oct 19 with 1599 views | Huw57 |
Rangel is way past. Needs to be binned ASAP, as much as I, and all Swans fans, hate the idea. |  |
| |
| Rangel? on 22:40 - Oct 19 with 1556 views | Rancid |
Thought he played well tonight too.Him and Shelvey only players to come out with any credit. |  | | |
| Rangel? on 22:52 - Oct 19 with 1506 views | premierjack |
I thing naughton was given time off for the birth of his daughter. I never thought I'd say this but... Maybe jazz would have been a better option than Rangel tonight | | | |
| Rangel? on 23:26 - Oct 19 with 1432 views | PatchesOHoulihan |
Rangel was definitely one of the better performers tonight. Always available for a pass but unfortunately not helped out by Barrow much.
Without him would have had a lot less going forward and also thought defensively he was solid. Think Rangel and Leon have been discarded slightly too early. |  |
| This is Patches O'Houlihan saying "Take care of your balls, and they'll take care of you." |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Rangel? on 23:30 - Oct 19 with 1408 views | Kilkennyjack |
| Rangel? on 23:26 - Oct 19 by PatchesOHoulihan |
Rangel was definitely one of the better performers tonight. Always available for a pass but unfortunately not helped out by Barrow much.
Without him would have had a lot less going forward and also thought defensively he was solid. Think Rangel and Leon have been discarded slightly too early. |
Correct |  |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| Rangel? on 23:31 - Oct 19 with 1401 views | oh_tommy_tommy |
Angel had a very good game against Spurs |  |
| |
| Rangel? on 23:32 - Oct 19 with 1396 views | LeonisGod |
| Rangel? on 22:29 - Oct 19 by deanscfc |
If there was no injury to Naughton then that is a poor decision from Monk. Regardless of Naughton's form, Rangel has beeen off the pace for years now. Good servant and bench player but when he is starting then that must get the opposition excited. Shows weakness. |
Couldn't disagree more. Rangel still embodies all that we used to be about. He got sod all help from anyone around him and had nowhere to go a lot of the time. As for being past it, he was busting a gut to get into the box on 85 minutes whilst Ayew stood on the touchline watching. | | | |
| Rangel? on 23:37 - Oct 19 with 1378 views | lovejuicejack |
Wasn't it his poor back header that lead to the penalty, if we are relying on Rangel them we are in big trouble. |  | | |
| Rangel? on 23:38 - Oct 19 with 1371 views | Joe_bradshaw |
| Rangel? on 23:37 - Oct 19 by lovejuicejack |
Wasn't it his poor back header that lead to the penalty, if we are relying on Rangel them we are in big trouble. |
No.
That was Jack Cork. |  |
| |
| Rangel? on 23:40 - Oct 19 with 1354 views | LeonisGod |
| Rangel? on 23:37 - Oct 19 by lovejuicejack |
Wasn't it his poor back header that lead to the penalty, if we are relying on Rangel them we are in big trouble. |
Angel was up the pitch as we'd just been attacking through him. Jack screwed up I think. | | | |
| Rangel? on 23:41 - Oct 19 with 1342 views | Dr_Winston |
Cork screwed up with the header and the weak tackle on the edge of the area. | |
| Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. |
| |
| Rangel? on 23:41 - Oct 19 with 1332 views | lovejuicejack |
| Rangel? on 23:40 - Oct 19 by LeonisGod |
Angel was up the pitch as we'd just been attacking through him. Jack screwed up I think. |
I stand corrected thanks guys, love Rangel I really do but I just get the impression is not in his legs anymore | | | |
| Rangel? on 23:44 - Oct 19 with 1323 views | LeonisGod |
| Rangel? on 23:41 - Oct 19 by lovejuicejack |
I stand corrected thanks guys, love Rangel I really do but I just get the impression is not in his legs anymore |
He was running box to box right to the end, which is more than can be said for some of them. It would be interesting to see the distance covered stats - I bet Rangel would be a lot nearer the top than the bottom.
He's not a world beater, but he's certainly not the reason we lost tonight. | | | |
| Rangel? on 23:48 - Oct 19 with 1305 views | ChrisSCFC |
Was Routledge injured? He's a million miles more talented than Barrow ever will be. |  | | |
| Rangel? on 23:48 - Oct 19 with 1301 views | Jackanapes |
| Rangel? on 23:41 - Oct 19 by Dr_Winston |
Cork screwed up with the header and the weak tackle on the edge of the area. |
Jack Cork had a 10 min symphony of ineptitude to start the game. I was glad he had started after Ki was largely anonymous v Spurs but I hadnt seen Cork play a bad game until tonight.....but Taylor was awful, so was Williams. Fernandez was spectacularly bad. Rangel was just his usual. [Post edited 19 Oct 2015 23:49]
|  |
|
“The stupidest thing she knew was for people to act like they knew all about the things they knew absolutely nothing about.†|
| |
| Rangel? on 23:49 - Oct 19 with 1295 views | lovejuicejack |
| Rangel? on 23:44 - Oct 19 by LeonisGod |
He was running box to box right to the end, which is more than can be said for some of them. It would be interesting to see the distance covered stats - I bet Rangel would be a lot nearer the top than the bottom.
He's not a world beater, but he's certainly not the reason we lost tonight. |
No absolutely he is not the reason we lost tonight, that was a team effort and he does run all match for sure but he had lost pace naturally due to age. | | | |
| Rangel? on 23:49 - Oct 19 with 1292 views | Dr_Winston |
| Rangel? on 23:48 - Oct 19 by Jackanapes |
Jack Cork had a 10 min symphony of ineptitude to start the game. I was glad he had started after Ki was largely anonymous v Spurs but I hadnt seen Cork play a bad game until tonight.....but Taylor was awful, so was Williams. Fernandez was spectacularly bad. Rangel was just his usual. [Post edited 19 Oct 2015 23:49]
|
I'm a big fan of JC generally but tonight just wasn't his night at all. | |
| Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
