Onahua.. No thanks. 00:11 - May 3 with 12155 views | WilloW4 | For months I've been saying he's crap. Just get rid. Some posters on here seem to like him. Explain please. | | | | |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 11:32 - May 3 with 2488 views | Discodroids |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 11:01 - May 3 by WilloW4 | As always disco, a fine post..."it's a message board that should be enjoyable, not a session with Alan Bennet"..... Wonderful stuff.!! |
i dunno mate, id just woken up and went off on one , its just not very nice to log on to this board on what now seems a daily basis to have some herbert having a snide dig like some komodo dragon flicking out his forked tongue . its a drip drip effect on here that brings me right down..the lot of em can all gather round and devour me when im laid to rest in the sprinbok public house watering hole. jesus its bad enough this season without being pulled up on spelling and punctuation. I remember a bloke who used to work in lloyds , an fcca accountant on our syndicate, who used to pull up some of the junior staff publicly. he used to mime to 'layla' by derek and the dominoes holding a broom , throwing his head back clapton esq style at the christmas parties.. i even saw him apologise to a dormant chair once when he bumped into it..see what i mean willow!. | |
| The Duke Of New York. A-Number One.
|
| |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 11:33 - May 3 with 2499 views | eastside_r |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 09:46 - May 3 by Discodroids | What a pious shitty thing to say to me and the rest of the board, some may have dyslexia, like me, or just want to put thier point across the only way they know how. why attack me off the bat like that.?? can any one explain that to me as i wake up with my coffee this morning?? snide, petty , nasty shit. at least people engage me mate, unlike you who is simply ignored. never understood this high handed manner of some to peoples comprehension ,spelling and writing style. its a message board that should be enjoyable, not a session with alan Bennet. there's one poor fellow on here whose beliefs are the polar opposite to mine in every way, and would be an east target because of his spelling and lack of understanding of the basic written word..i would never pull him upon it, as he may some difficulty in that regard. you know what the geezer is saying, and willows a nice bloke and great contributor to this board. just leave that pious crap out of it. fuk me ,whats wrong with this place? ,what do you want on here clive , a message board for speak and spell machines WHAT.IS.YOURE.FAVOURITE.KFC.KRUSHEM.?. [Post edited 3 May 2015 10:41]
|
Literally WTF!? I presume you replied to the wrong post / thread. | | | |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 11:45 - May 3 with 2458 views | Discodroids |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 01:29 - May 3 by eastside_r | Fair enough. You seem to be able to punctuate correctly (unlike some posters on here who are fêted, everyone knows who I mean) but spelling the name of one of our players seems to be beyond you. Never understood this. |
bollocks. | |
| The Duke Of New York. A-Number One.
|
| |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 11:53 - May 3 with 2461 views | Marc |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 00:29 - May 3 by WilloW4 | What? He needs a leader next to him? He's a a fecking brute of a man, built like an old school middleweight boxer... Poxy caulker is 6ft 4... Surely those pair off overatted pansys could hold each other's hands and play a decent game of football together.. I wouldn't hesitate to get shot of both. |
Because he's built like a brick shithouse doesnt make him a leader Someone like Scott Dann or our very own Richard Dunne as a leader type next to Onuoha is what i'm guessing he meant More than good enough for the new season ahead | | | |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 13:13 - May 3 with 2404 views | THEBUSH | What Centre Backs does the OP think, are good enough for us | | | |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 13:48 - May 3 with 2380 views | BklynRanger |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 10:02 - May 3 by californiahoop | I might be wrong but I have never seen him lose his cool like this, yesterday might have been hard on him, he only just lost his mum to cancer. I know it might be an excuse as we have been poor all season but that game should have been called off. |
It was 2 or 3 years ago that he lost his mum, Cali. | | | |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 13:56 - May 3 with 2374 views | AgedR |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 11:08 - May 3 by BazzaInTheLoft | What is his salary and how do you know? |
He was signed by Hughes and was much vaunted at the time, so I suspect he may well be on a few quid. I rather like him. He has made significantly less errors than Caulker this season and has the pace that we suffer from the lack of when Dunne or Hill play there. His touch isnt great and I think that Isla must be scratching his head over the fact that Ned is playing in front of him. But, he's the best of the centre half options we have I think. However, assuming SOG's point is correct (and on this occasion I think it might be), we should listen to offers. The pay structure at the club has to be reformed. | |
| |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 14:32 - May 3 with 2315 views | HollowayRanger | simpson elmer dunne yun that would do for me with hill as sub defender | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Onahua.. No thanks. on 14:34 - May 3 with 2322 views | kensalriser | Simpson plays for Leicester. Why the fck would he come back to QPR? | |
| |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 14:37 - May 3 with 2312 views | Bedford_R | Whinge, whinge, whinge. Blah, blah, blah. Scapegoat. Carry on.... | |
| |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 14:48 - May 3 with 2289 views | BazzaInTheLoft |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 14:37 - May 3 by Bedford_R | Whinge, whinge, whinge. Blah, blah, blah. Scapegoat. Carry on.... |
......knee jerk knee jerk, rant rant rant. speculation speculation speculation........ | | | |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 14:54 - May 3 with 2271 views | Gloucs_R | Personally I am just hoping for a settled back 4 next year. RB / Ehmer or Onouha / Caulker / Yun Back up - Robinson, Harriman, Dunne, plus the lads from the U21. Sorry but resigning Hill would be a mistake in my opinion, unless it was player coach. | |
| |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 14:54 - May 3 with 2263 views | HollowayRanger |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 14:34 - May 3 by kensalriser | Simpson plays for Leicester. Why the fck would he come back to QPR? |
because he isn't playing for Leicester cant get in the team and because the idiot who sold him has left the building | |
| |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 15:23 - May 3 with 2256 views | Gloucs_R | I would have Simpson back | |
| |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 15:36 - May 3 with 2235 views | QPR_John |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 08:28 - May 3 by bosh67 | I think one of the teams coming up may take him but I like Ned. He is a well educated lad, works hard, but as everyone says, possibly more suited to the Championship, purely because his ball play is so limited. But then again so was Alan McDonalds, but Macca was a real leader. Ned perhaps is too quiet to be a leader but he has the attributes. I have the feeling that if we keep Ehmer, who has the best feet and ball skills of any defender we have alongside him that we would be okay next year. More to the point we must start playing Ehmer. He is 6 foot 5 and has the ability to be the next Glenn Roeder. |
"I think one of the teams coming up may take him but I like Ned. He is a well educated lad, works hard, but as everyone says, possibly more suited to the Championship, purely because his ball play is so limited." Why would a promoted team take him if he is more suited to the Championship | | | |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 15:48 - May 3 with 2103 views | Marc |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 14:54 - May 3 by Gloucs_R | Personally I am just hoping for a settled back 4 next year. RB / Ehmer or Onouha / Caulker / Yun Back up - Robinson, Harriman, Dunne, plus the lads from the U21. Sorry but resigning Hill would be a mistake in my opinion, unless it was player coach. |
Robinson is out for a year after picking up an injury around late feb/early march | | | |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 15:53 - May 3 with 2092 views | SpiritofGregory |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 15:23 - May 3 by Gloucs_R | I would have Simpson back |
We need to stop looking to the past, we need a fresh start. No one in their right mind would leave Leicester to come to QPR even if they are not good enough to get into the first team. | | | |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 16:05 - May 3 with 2072 views | Marc |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 15:53 - May 3 by SpiritofGregory | We need to stop looking to the past, we need a fresh start. No one in their right mind would leave Leicester to come to QPR even if they are not good enough to get into the first team. |
I'd take Matt Connolly and Jamie Mackie back Both realistic and available | | | |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 16:23 - May 3 with 2058 views | SpiritofGregory |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 16:05 - May 3 by Marc | I'd take Matt Connolly and Jamie Mackie back Both realistic and available |
Connolly has just been promoted with Watford. Jaime Mackie isn't good enough for the Premier League and hasn't set the world alight at Reading. How can you expect the club to have a decent scouting network when the fans want to sign players from the past. We need a fresh start, starting with the chairman. | | | |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 16:42 - May 3 with 2026 views | BazzaInTheLoft |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 16:23 - May 3 by SpiritofGregory | Connolly has just been promoted with Watford. Jaime Mackie isn't good enough for the Premier League and hasn't set the world alight at Reading. How can you expect the club to have a decent scouting network when the fans want to sign players from the past. We need a fresh start, starting with the chairman. |
Yeah, we need fresh blood to scapegoat and rant about. No good just slagging the same old people. | | | |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 21:51 - May 3 with 1928 views | YorkRanger | Ned will be fine in the Championship. Ehmer will be good to get involved and Sendles White. I'd keep Dunne and Hill. If we can get our money back on Caulker then get rid. As for some of the other comments. I for one would carry Mackie on my back from Reading to Shepherds Bush. Some people need to get real and re-,set their sights. We will be in the Championship..... | | | |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 22:52 - May 3 with 1876 views | danehoop |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 10:56 - May 3 by SpiritofGregory | Cumbersome player. His salary is utter madness. |
Of course SOG, I forgot that you have access to every players contract and what they are being paid. Oh sorry, you don't and like so much of what you say was just spurious nonsense. How is Stephen Pressley by the way? Surely a shoe in for the new season? | |
| Never knowingly understood |
| |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 23:11 - May 3 with 1860 views | OakR | with good run at CB I think he is more than decent - he has something we lack aka pace. He is not a right back however and I think this taints people's view of him. Settle him in at CB and keep him there and we will reap the rewards. That said I doubt he will stay. I would keep Hill on as well - will still do a job for us at CB when called upon. I'd go, subject to if they would accept the salary, Ehmer, Dunner, Hill, Ned | |
| |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 07:16 - May 4 with 1802 views | fakekerby | I'd sell him for any offers around 3-4 million. He's nothing special and easily replaceable. He's certainly not a premier league player - he'll be good in the championship which I why I wouldn't sell him cheaply but he's not vital for us next season one way or the other. | | | |
Onahua.. No thanks. on 08:54 - May 4 with 1747 views | danehoop | Start off with what is better that is available? Then remove from that list anyone with a significant transfer fee. Then remove from that list those who wouldn't be interested in joining us. Suddenly there are far fewer options available to us which are either as good as, let alone better than what we currently have. He is our player, he played reasonably well in the Premiership, is fit, quick motivated and effective, particularly with a verbal centre back next too him. | |
| Never knowingly understood |
| |
| |