| Van Dijk for £8m on 09:05 - Aug 6 with 9573 views | TheClash |
Not too rich for us. |  |
| The Future is tomorrow's today! |
|  |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 09:11 - Aug 6 with 9530 views | Parlay |
I cant see us splashing £8m on a center back. Saints are in the driving seat and have so much more financial clout than us. |  |
| |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 09:55 - Aug 6 with 9322 views | Private_Partz |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 09:11 - Aug 6 by Parlay |
I cant see us splashing £8m on a center back. Saints are in the driving seat and have so much more financial clout than us. |
Our hand could be forced if Chico goes on the cheap. |  |
| You have mission in life to hold out your hand,
To help the other guy out,
Help your fellow man.
Stan Ridgway
|
| |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 09:56 - Aug 6 with 9309 views | JACKARSE |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 09:55 - Aug 6 by Private_Partz |
Our hand could be forced if Chico goes on the cheap. |
Reported at £3.5M .... shocking IMO |  | | |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 10:04 - Aug 6 with 9264 views | oh_tommy_tommy |
We've sold Chico
So it's probably a runner We must have a chance of getting him surely. |  |
| |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 10:28 - Aug 6 with 9176 views | raynor94 |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 09:56 - Aug 6 by JACKARSE |
Reported at £3.5M .... shocking IMO |
A 1.5 million profit shocking? |  |
| |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 10:29 - Aug 6 with 9164 views | oh_tommy_tommy |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 10:28 - Aug 6 by raynor94 |
A 1.5 million profit shocking? |
I would say yes .
Dreadful profit | |
| |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 10:32 - Aug 6 with 9145 views | TheClash |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 09:11 - Aug 6 by Parlay |
I cant see us splashing £8m on a center back. Saints are in the driving seat and have so much more financial clout than us. |
Caulker was £8 million and this guy is rated higher than him so I don;t think it will be a problem as we hardly spent anything in transfer fees this window. | |
| The Future is tomorrow's today! |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Van Dijk for £8m on 10:34 - Aug 6 with 9138 views | oh_tommy_tommy |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 10:32 - Aug 6 by TheClash |
Caulker was £8 million and this guy is rated higher than him so I don;t think it will be a problem as we hardly spent anything in transfer fees this window. |
Apparently we are not that rich a club , some where saying on here in the week. | |
| |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 10:36 - Aug 6 with 9131 views | Swan91 |
If you take in mind the Chico sale for this guy then it would work out as about 4 - 4.5 million which I think is about right. Plus chicos wage budget would probably cover Van Dijk so we wouldn't be adding to the wage bill.
If we sign him and Ramon azeez for about 3 million then I would say that's pretty much it for transfers (oh also if we get Mathews or another RB aswell)
I hope these transfers come off |  | | |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 10:41 - Aug 6 with 9098 views | QuakerJack |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 10:29 - Aug 6 by oh_tommy_tommy |
I would say yes .
Dreadful profit |
3.5 mil for a proven premier league CB with two years in the league behind him, aged 27, when previously he'd been loaned out by his parent club to Genoa.
Nowhere near enough. These Qatari clubs have masses and masses of cash. |  |
| |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 10:44 - Aug 6 with 9070 views | Swan91 |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 10:29 - Aug 6 by oh_tommy_tommy |
I would say yes .
Dreadful profit |
I agree, was hoping we would be able to get about 5 million for him. They must already have a deal In place for cover otherwise it is a hell of a risk. | | | |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 10:48 - Aug 6 with 9042 views | Parlay |
I would be ecstatic to be proven wrong, i just cant see it. | |
| |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 11:32 - Aug 6 with 8893 views | MagicDaps |
I don't see why anyone can complain with £3.5 million for Chico given that he's going to Qatar, he's a player with the mindset of cashing on his career and effectively retiring. To get £3.5 million for a player that doesn't want to play competitive football is good business.
We've been forced in to selling him, there's not a lot we can do when the player and his agent clearly want this move to Qatar and we just aren't in a position to negotiate. Either we sell to Qatar, or we have an unhappy player for the next two years before he moves to Qatar.
As for Van Dijk, we should just take the hit and pay what Celtic want. He's the best centre back available, suited to our style of play and the natural replacement to Chico. We've been a few positions where we've not been in a position to negotiate as players have wanted to go which has cost us a few million, but if we can bring in the best players possible in and have the best squad possible to us then we'll stay up and financially we'll remain in an excellent position. | |
| |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 11:48 - Aug 6 with 8819 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 11:32 - Aug 6 by MagicDaps |
I don't see why anyone can complain with £3.5 million for Chico given that he's going to Qatar, he's a player with the mindset of cashing on his career and effectively retiring. To get £3.5 million for a player that doesn't want to play competitive football is good business.
We've been forced in to selling him, there's not a lot we can do when the player and his agent clearly want this move to Qatar and we just aren't in a position to negotiate. Either we sell to Qatar, or we have an unhappy player for the next two years before he moves to Qatar.
As for Van Dijk, we should just take the hit and pay what Celtic want. He's the best centre back available, suited to our style of play and the natural replacement to Chico. We've been a few positions where we've not been in a position to negotiate as players have wanted to go which has cost us a few million, but if we can bring in the best players possible in and have the best squad possible to us then we'll stay up and financially we'll remain in an excellent position. |
Chris Wathan this morning is intimating that £3.5m or whatever was the first offer whereas we valued Chico at £5m and suggests that they have now upped their offer which is why Chico is talking to them.
I woud think £5m for Chico to be reasonable. I also think we need to get either this Celtic player or the Argentinian player.
I wonder if some of this will depend on Celtic's result tonight - if they get knocked out then perhaps both Matthews and Van Dijk will then be on their way as I believe that Celtic will then need to reduce their wage bill substantially. | | | |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 11:50 - Aug 6 with 8811 views | Zut_Alors |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 11:48 - Aug 6 by londonlisa2001 |
Chris Wathan this morning is intimating that £3.5m or whatever was the first offer whereas we valued Chico at £5m and suggests that they have now upped their offer which is why Chico is talking to them.
I woud think £5m for Chico to be reasonable. I also think we need to get either this Celtic player or the Argentinian player.
I wonder if some of this will depend on Celtic's result tonight - if they get knocked out then perhaps both Matthews and Van Dijk will then be on their way as I believe that Celtic will then need to reduce their wage bill substantially. |
I think that's likely to be the case. Let's hope they lose then. |  | | |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 11:52 - Aug 6 with 8791 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 11:50 - Aug 6 by Zut_Alors |
I think that's likely to be the case. Let's hope they lose then. |
I would think that them turning over a 4:1 is a little unlikely if they play anything like reports suggested they played last week. | | | |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 11:54 - Aug 6 with 8782 views | pencoedjack |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 11:52 - Aug 6 by londonlisa2001 |
I would think that them turning over a 4:1 is a little unlikely if they play anything like reports suggested they played last week. |
Shouldn't you be having a caviar & champers lunch  |  | | |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 11:59 - Aug 6 with 8752 views | Far_Post |
Undisclosed Fee it is then... | |
| |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 12:22 - Aug 6 with 8658 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 11:54 - Aug 6 by pencoedjack |
Shouldn't you be having a caviar & champers lunch |
cheese sandwich - does that count? | | | |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 12:23 - Aug 6 with 8647 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 11:59 - Aug 6 by Far_Post |
Undisclosed Fee it is then... |
and the reasons for that can be partly explained by the thread on Vorm and sell on clauses perhaps? Aren't virtually all transfers undisclosed fees? | | | |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 12:24 - Aug 6 with 8637 views | dobjack2 |
In a bidding war wages could be our problem | | | |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 12:56 - Aug 6 with 8502 views | raynor94 |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 12:24 - Aug 6 by dobjack2 |
In a bidding war wages could be our problem |
I think with the players we have already signed that's not the case | |
| |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 13:00 - Aug 6 with 8468 views | Tom1912 |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 09:11 - Aug 6 by Parlay |
I cant see us splashing £8m on a center back. Saints are in the driving seat and have so much more financial clout than us. |
Not sure about them having more financial clout than us. It doesn't seem like the new owners are that keen to reinvest. Yes they have a lot more money coming in but it doesn't seem like they want to spend it. | | | |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 16:17 - Aug 6 with 8180 views | skippyjack |
| Van Dijk for £8m on 10:34 - Aug 6 by oh_tommy_tommy |
Apparently we are not that rich a club , some where saying on here in the week. |
I know.. the exodus of Michu (loan fee.. wages freed up).. Poz, Lita, Ngog, Vorm, Davies, Lamah, Vasquez, Edwards (hefty fee apparently), Obeng, Meade and Canas, Chico Hernandez possibly going for fees... Ash, Monks.. The Directors have a hefty pay increase and dividend.. jobs a good un... I'm still miffed and baffled... we've saved millions in wages ... [Post edited 6 Aug 2014 16:20]
|  |
| The awkward moment when a Welsh Club become the Champions of England.. shh
The Swansea Way.. To upset the odds. | | Poll: | Best Swans Player |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
