| Interview with the Owners 19:05 - Sep 3 with 46129 views | Headmaster |
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/45396360
"Swansea City's owners have warned it could take years for the club to return to the Premier League as they confront the "harsh reality" of relegation." [Post edited 3 Sep 2018 19:08]
|  | | |  |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:10 - Sep 3 with 2842 views | _ |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:05 - Sep 3 by monmouth |
Equity instead of loans to cover a financial hole?
This all has a very bad feel. I'm wondering about the motivation at the moment though. Is it to try and publicly blame the Trust if they take the shithouses to court? "The legal action means that we can't fund working capital and the club is at risk".
Buying shares off the Trust brings no new money into the club and gives them no benefit so they would only offer again if they were pretty sure they would lose in court.
As a club, we are a state. The Trust has never needed to be at the top of its game so desperately. [Post edited 3 Sep 2018 20:08]
|
Well that's just a lot of mis-quoting and guesswork in your post mate so hang on and we'll find out more.
Of course we wouldn't have to find out if the Trust just communicated, instead we have to wait for these dull forums before getting to hear anything .
Poor show. |  |
| |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:13 - Sep 3 with 2815 views | Darran |
Pair of çunts and you have to be deluded to believe a word that comes out of their stinking fuçking mouths. |  |
| |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:14 - Sep 3 with 2811 views | Oldjack |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:07 - Sep 3 by jack2jack |
Surely it won't take years, only took em two years to get us out of it.(Alright calm down).
Can we trust them to rebuild that's the question! |
no ,their agender is to make money ,no matter what .we'll be on a shoestring as already been proved |  |
| Prosser the Tosser dwells on Phil's bum hole like a rusty old hemorrhoid ,fact
You Greedy Bastards Get Out Of OUR Club!
|
| |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:15 - Sep 3 with 2790 views | dobjack2 |
| Interview with the Owners on 19:35 - Sep 3 by hobo |
wtf is this all about??
"Having budgeted for much more, the Swans received a combined total of only around £30m for the departures of defenders Alfie Mawson and Federico Fernandez, forward Jordan Ayew, centre-backs Jordi Amat and Kyle Bartley, midfielder Sam Clucas and goalkeeper Lukasz Fabianski.
That combined figure is around £15m less than the sum of the fees widely reported for those players."
Do they mean we only received £30m this season, with further payments to be received in future seasons?
Surely there's no way we'd only sell that lot for £30m? That's abysmal even by the board's standards. Other clubs would have sold Mawson alone for that amount |
Those figures don’t add up. |  | | |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:16 - Sep 3 with 2788 views | jack2jack |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:14 - Sep 3 by Oldjack |
no ,their agender is to make money ,no matter what .we'll be on a shoestring as already been proved |
Is was expecting that OJ👠|  | | |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:17 - Sep 3 with 2783 views | SwanLuke |
It’s all just waffle again! How anyone can believe a word these two say is beyond me yet there are some on here (we all know who) who will continuously defend these people who are destroying our club. |  | | |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:18 - Sep 3 with 2763 views | QJumpingJack |
A disastrous interview.
It looks like the questions may have been "manufactured". Kaplan, Levien or someone else / their PR advisor chose the questions.
They come across as very arrogant.
This is very telling:
Do you see yourselves staying for the long haul?
SK: "Yes we do. You're going to be stuck with us for a while."
It feels as if Kaplan is goading/taunting us. | | | |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:19 - Sep 3 with 2751 views | Flashberryjack |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:10 - Sep 3 by _ |
Well that's just a lot of mis-quoting and guesswork in your post mate so hang on and we'll find out more.
Of course we wouldn't have to find out if the Trust just communicated, instead we have to wait for these dull forums before getting to hear anything .
Poor show. |
Haven't the trust been legally advised not to go public with regards to taking legal action, which I would have thought is normal practice in cases such as this. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Interview with the Owners on 20:20 - Sep 3 with 2738 views | SwanLuke |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:18 - Sep 3 by QJumpingJack |
A disastrous interview.
It looks like the questions may have been "manufactured". Kaplan, Levien or someone else / their PR advisor chose the questions.
They come across as very arrogant.
This is very telling:
Do you see yourselves staying for the long haul?
SK: "Yes we do. You're going to be stuck with us for a while."
It feels as if Kaplan is goading/taunting us. |
Agree with this, what a sad state of affairs | | | |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:20 - Sep 3 with 2738 views | pencoedjack |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:13 - Sep 3 by Darran |
Pair of çunts and you have to be deluded to believe a word that comes out of their stinking fuçking mouths. |
Sums it up nicely Darren |  | | |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:21 - Sep 3 with 2735 views | _ |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:13 - Sep 3 by Darran |
Pair of çunts and you have to be deluded to believe a word that comes out of their stinking fuçking mouths. |
That they and Jenkins had made mistakes?
That they gambled on staying in the EPL?
That Potter did actually want Woods and they hoped Brentford would lower on the last day?
That we got less than is reported (or widely thought) for the players we sold?
That we are going back to looking for the identity that served us well?
That we have more faith in working with players we know than we do from risking big transfers coming in?
That we want a young and hungry squad of players who want to play for SCFC?
That the remediation involves the selling shareholders as well?
That Jenkins has less involvement in the recruitment policy now?
Which bits couldn't you get your smoke riddled brain around pal? | |
| |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:21 - Sep 3 with 2721 views | FerrisBuellerJB |
They state that no dividends have been paid obviously not as that would mean making a payment to the trust. What they don’t state is how much has been paid in consultancy fees either to them or to other businesses owned by them. There’s more than one way to extract money out as we have seen with Morgan and Dineen. |  | | |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:22 - Sep 3 with 2715 views | Headmaster |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:18 - Sep 3 by QJumpingJack |
A disastrous interview.
It looks like the questions may have been "manufactured". Kaplan, Levien or someone else / their PR advisor chose the questions.
They come across as very arrogant.
This is very telling:
Do you see yourselves staying for the long haul?
SK: "Yes we do. You're going to be stuck with us for a while."
It feels as if Kaplan is goading/taunting us. |
SK: "So if anybody's hoping we're selling the club, they're sorely mistaken.
You're going to be stuck with us for a while."
That part definitely made me feel uneasy. Not a good vibe. | | | |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:23 - Sep 3 with 2711 views | SwanLuke |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:21 - Sep 3 by _ |
That they and Jenkins had made mistakes?
That they gambled on staying in the EPL?
That Potter did actually want Woods and they hoped Brentford would lower on the last day?
That we got less than is reported (or widely thought) for the players we sold?
That we are going back to looking for the identity that served us well?
That we have more faith in working with players we know than we do from risking big transfers coming in?
That we want a young and hungry squad of players who want to play for SCFC?
That the remediation involves the selling shareholders as well?
That Jenkins has less involvement in the recruitment policy now?
Which bits couldn't you get your smoke riddled brain around pal? |
Why are you so aggressive 
Are you related to these Americans? | | | |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:23 - Sep 3 with 2702 views | _ |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:19 - Sep 3 by Flashberryjack |
Haven't the trust been legally advised not to go public with regards to taking legal action, which I would have thought is normal practice in cases such as this. |
The Trust have an update is my guess hence the fans forum planned soon.
My point is why wait til then and get it out there now. | |
| |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:23 - Sep 3 with 2698 views | Darran |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:17 - Sep 3 by SwanLuke |
It’s all just waffle again! How anyone can believe a word these two say is beyond me yet there are some on here (we all know who) who will continuously defend these people who are destroying our club. |
Well said Luke. | |
| |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:24 - Sep 3 with 2693 views | QJumpingJack |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:22 - Sep 3 by Headmaster |
SK: "So if anybody's hoping we're selling the club, they're sorely mistaken.
You're going to be stuck with us for a while."
That part definitely made me feel uneasy. Not a good vibe. |
It has a whiff of Tony Petty to it. | | | |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:24 - Sep 3 with 2685 views | Dippy |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:10 - Sep 3 by _ |
Well that's just a lot of mis-quoting and guesswork in your post mate so hang on and we'll find out more.
Of course we wouldn't have to find out if the Trust just communicated, instead we have to wait for these dull forums before getting to hear anything .
Poor show. |
Chris is right.. there's no clarity. The Trust are thumb twiddling.. the Yanks openly stated they want a meeting. Sumbler, go and find us some clarity of "what the f*ck is happening" | |
| |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:26 - Sep 3 with 2672 views | _ |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:23 - Sep 3 by SwanLuke |
Why are you so aggressive
Are you related to these Americans? |
So someone who posted people are deluded and used words like stinking mouths isn't worthy of your reply but mine is?
I rest my case | |
| |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:28 - Sep 3 with 2634 views | Darran |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:20 - Sep 3 by pencoedjack |
Sums it up nicely Darren |
When we are right in the shit in a couple of years you won’t see the arse lickers admitting they were wrong either. | |
| |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:30 - Sep 3 with 2609 views | QJumpingJack |
If you read between the lines, it doesn't sound like that Jenkins will be here much longer.
There is no real praise for him. They are attempting (badly) to explain why they still use him. | | | |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:33 - Sep 3 with 2577 views | Captain_Sham |
| Interview with the Owners on 19:44 - Sep 3 by angryjack |
I felt physically sick reading that also anger,I would love to just hurt the kants badly just short of death the kants |
Angry jack feels angry.lol |  |
| |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:34 - Sep 3 with 2576 views | _ |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:28 - Sep 3 by Darran |
When we are right in the shit in a couple of years you won’t see the arse lickers admitting they were wrong either. |
I guess that's me again you are referring to.
But I, or others would't be wrong would we? As at this moment in time nobody knows, do they?
It's all guesswork and allowing the benefit of the doubt. Now offering them that may turn out to be misplaced but until we know how can anyone be wrong.
Why don't you state exactly what it is they're up to so in a "couple of years" we will look back at your revelation and be able to tell you you're right.
Let's have it? | |
| |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:34 - Sep 3 with 2574 views | pencoedjack |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:28 - Sep 3 by Darran |
When we are right in the shit in a couple of years you won’t see the arse lickers admitting they were wrong either. |
I’ve given up reading their posts many moons ago | | | |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:34 - Sep 3 with 2570 views | marchamjack |
| Interview with the Owners on 20:23 - Sep 3 by _ |
The Trust have an update is my guess hence the fans forum planned soon.
My point is why wait til then and get it out there now. |
It’s interesting, even possibly telling...the Yanks specifically make mention of the Trust and wanting to talk to them (for the first time in ages) and to do so not lawyered up. Also, making specific reference in that to the previous owners (so linking it/ them all up). I wonder if the Yanks are getting their own legal guys now telling them the Trust may have an actionable position and they’re getting their own position in place in front of any upcoming Trust announcement.
Definitely a more conciliatory tone from them, even the acknowledgement of the Trust in all the rest they say stands out. As someone says above, now is the time for the Trust to step up and I suspect finally the Trust have those in place and of a like mind to step up. |  |
| Oh,..Dave, what's occuring? |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
