| Today's Formation 11:34 - Sep 11 with 5331 views | Darran |
Well according to several 'ITK' people we are playing a new formation today.
anyone heard anymore? |  |
| |  |
| Today's Formation on 11:48 - Sep 11 with 3837 views | plasjack |
I think the starting line up will 11 players, could be wrong though. |  | | |
| Today's Formation on 11:49 - Sep 11 with 3832 views | Swanseajill |
I'm in the know.
We're playing six a side with a reduced goalmouth. |  | | |
| Today's Formation on 11:53 - Sep 11 with 3802 views | monmouth |
10-0-0 |  |
| |
| Today's Formation on 11:54 - Sep 11 with 3790 views | Darran |
There's some thick tw*ts on here aye. | |
| |
| Today's Formation on 11:55 - Sep 11 with 3788 views | FatherJack |
Given Chelsea's performances so far, I'd suggest maybe a flat back 10?
.
edit: I see Monmouth's thinking along the same lines. [Post edited 11 Sep 2016 12:00]
|  |
| |
| Today's Formation on 11:55 - Sep 11 with 3775 views | plasjack |
| Today's Formation on 11:53 - Sep 11 by monmouth |
10-0-0 |
Where's Fab? | | | |
| Today's Formation on 11:57 - Sep 11 with 3758 views | whiterock |
| Today's Formation on 11:55 - Sep 11 by plasjack |
Where's Fab? |
Back in hand keeper |  | | |
| Today's Formation on 11:59 - Sep 11 with 3736 views | Swanseajill |
| Today's Formation on 11:54 - Sep 11 by Darran |
There's some thick tw*ts on here aye. |
New formation or simply playing with penetration, strength and passion.
I know where my vote goes. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Today's Formation on 12:05 - Sep 11 with 3685 views | IAN05 |
5 at the back apparently - no idea if true | | | |
| Today's Formation on 12:05 - Sep 11 with 3684 views | taff999555 |
"ITK". What a load of nonsense. Ridiculous post. | | | |
| Today's Formation on 12:09 - Sep 11 with 3669 views | Darran |
| Today's Formation on 11:59 - Sep 11 by Swanseajill |
New formation or simply playing with penetration, strength and passion.
I know where my vote goes. |
Sounds like me in the bedroom.  | |
| |
| Today's Formation on 12:46 - Sep 11 with 3505 views | union_jack |
| Today's Formation on 12:09 - Sep 11 by Darran |
Sounds like me in the bedroom. |
Not what she told me  |  |
| |
| Today's Formation on 12:50 - Sep 11 with 3481 views | Darran |
| Today's Formation on 12:46 - Sep 11 by union_jack |
Not what she told me |
Prick. | |
| |
| Today's Formation on 13:00 - Sep 11 with 3409 views | shandyjack |
in an interview he gave this week he alluded to the fact the squad have been working on a new formation. wou;ld not surprise me to see a back 3, with Taylor/Kingsley one side naughts. either a 3-6-1 or a 3-5-2 |  |
| |
| Today's Formation on 13:02 - Sep 11 with 3394 views | Swanjaxs |
3 at the back it is.... Amat, Fernández and Kingsley with Taylor and Naughton as wing backs.... you heard it here first ðŸ‘👠[Post edited 11 Sep 2016 13:03]
|  |
| |
| Today's Formation on 13:07 - Sep 11 with 3340 views | shandyjack |
| Today's Formation on 13:02 - Sep 11 by Swanjaxs |
3 at the back it is.... Amat, Fernández and Kingsley with Taylor and Naughton as wing backs.... you heard it here first ðŸ‘👠[Post edited 11 Sep 2016 13:03]
|
if thats the case then what was the point in buying VDH when he can't even get a slot in a back 3? | |
| |
| Today's Formation on 13:08 - Sep 11 with 3332 views | Brynmill_Jack |
| Today's Formation on 13:07 - Sep 11 by shandyjack |
if thats the case then what was the point in buying VDH when he can't even get a slot in a back 3? |
Or Mawson???? |  |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| Today's Formation on 13:09 - Sep 11 with 3320 views | shandyjack |
| Today's Formation on 13:08 - Sep 11 by Brynmill_Jack |
Or Mawson???? |
Mawson i could kind of forgive as he's young and still bedding in, VDH had a full pre season ffs | |
| |
| Today's Formation on 13:16 - Sep 11 with 3279 views | Darran |
| Today's Formation on 13:07 - Sep 11 by shandyjack |
if thats the case then what was the point in buying VDH when he can't even get a slot in a back 3? |
I'd have preferred EVH anyway. | |
| |
| Today's Formation on 13:17 - Sep 11 with 3266 views | Starsky |
| Today's Formation on 13:09 - Sep 11 by shandyjack |
Mawson i could kind of forgive as he's young and still bedding in, VDH had a full pre season ffs |
I don't think that Both Amat & Fernandez will survive long in a 5-3-2. |  |
| It's just the internet, init. |
| |
| Today's Formation on 13:24 - Sep 11 with 3225 views | monmouth |
| Today's Formation on 13:17 - Sep 11 by Starsky |
I don't think that Both Amat & Fernandez will survive long in a 5-3-2. |
Could very well be this was Guido's preferred plan all along and why we bought Mawson. If Kingsley can play there, then we have 5 players for three starting positions, and cover at left back.
I'm not convinced about that 3 at the back formation personally, but we need to find a way of stopping teams running through us in the midfield at our centre backs for sure. | |
| |
| Today's Formation on 13:46 - Sep 11 with 3100 views | perchrockjack |
If he picks Amat and ff as starters we old we'll see an early Chelsea penalty.
Frankly, I'm beginning to think he s as clueless as the former manager.
Hopefully, I'm wrong | |
| |
| Today's Formation on 13:50 - Sep 11 with 3075 views | jasper_T |
| Today's Formation on 13:17 - Sep 11 by Starsky |
I don't think that Both Amat & Fernandez will survive long in a 5-3-2. |
Fernandez has played the bulk of his career in a 3 man defence. | | | |
| Today's Formation on 14:01 - Sep 11 with 2997 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| Today's Formation on 11:59 - Sep 11 by Swanseajill |
New formation or simply playing with penetration, strength and passion.
I know where my vote goes. |
That sounds a bit "naughty", but I like it.
Shades of Dick Emery. | | | |
| Today's Formation on 14:25 - Sep 11 with 2870 views | union_jack |
| Today's Formation on 12:50 - Sep 11 by Darran |
Prick. |
Yes, that's what she said as well. Didn't want to say.
 | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
