Matt Jarvis? 21:22 - Feb 2 with 9003 views | coolranger | SSN hearing Matt Jarvis may come to Rangers with Zarate returning to West Ham. | | | | |
Matt Jarvis? on 21:48 - Feb 2 with 2484 views | daveB |
Matt Jarvis? on 21:42 - Feb 2 by rangerslee | I know that Dave but the point I was making is that we are desperate for goals. Matt Jarvis can create as much as he wants but we won't have anybody on the end of it. Lose Charlie and we are snookered. |
desperate for someone to create goals as well, agree we need a 4th striker but had all month to get one. If Austin gets injured we're screwed no matter if we sign someone or not | | | |
Matt Jarvis? on 21:50 - Feb 2 with 2465 views | Maggsinho | Not going to happen apparently.
What a farce. | | | |
Matt Jarvis? on 21:53 - Feb 2 with 2418 views | PinnerPaul |
Matt Jarvis? on 21:50 - Feb 2 by Maggsinho | Not going to happen apparently.
What a farce. |
PL are now looking at it. Zarate can't play for more than two clubs, but then he won't be! | | | |
Matt Jarvis? on 21:54 - Feb 2 with 2406 views | Gloucs_R | QPR Executive team pose for a quick photo before the next home game... | |
| |
Matt Jarvis? on 21:56 - Feb 2 with 2371 views | danehoop | Remember that this all comes from a report from the daily mirror, so maybe all nonsense anyway. | |
| Never knowingly understood |
| |
Matt Jarvis? on 21:56 - Feb 2 with 2363 views | coolranger |
Matt Jarvis? on 21:50 - Feb 2 by Maggsinho | Not going to happen apparently.
What a farce. |
Well Glasgow Rangers are about to take FIVE players on loan from The Toon. How does that work? | | | |
Matt Jarvis? on 21:57 - Feb 2 with 2343 views | Maggsinho |
Matt Jarvis? on 21:56 - Feb 2 by coolranger | Well Glasgow Rangers are about to take FIVE players on loan from The Toon. How does that work? |
Different rules in the SPL? Dunno. | | | |
Matt Jarvis? on 21:59 - Feb 2 with 2295 views | rrrspricey | What a fcukin embarrassment. Signs Zarate on loan, refuses to play him then tries to send him back. Does this twunt not even know the prem rules? If this isn't reason enough to get rid... | | | | Login to get fewer ads
Matt Jarvis? on 22:01 - Feb 2 with 2275 views | essextaxiboy | Didnt we have Akotto and Tom Carroll at the same time ? Edit ...in the champ ..doh [Post edited 2 Feb 2015 22:02]
| | | |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:01 - Feb 2 with 2273 views | daveB | ha ha, absolutely hilarious | | | |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:02 - Feb 2 with 2238 views | robith |
Matt Jarvis? on 21:56 - Feb 2 by coolranger | Well Glasgow Rangers are about to take FIVE players on loan from The Toon. How does that work? |
International loans don't count - under rules they count like permanent transfers | | | |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:13 - Feb 2 with 2082 views | PinnerPaul | 5live saying it won't be allowed | | | |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:17 - Feb 2 with 1979 views | HollowayRanger | could always buy him instead! | |
| |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:19 - Feb 2 with 1949 views | stevec |
Matt Jarvis? on 21:59 - Feb 2 by rrrspricey | What a fcukin embarrassment. Signs Zarate on loan, refuses to play him then tries to send him back. Does this twunt not even know the prem rules? If this isn't reason enough to get rid... |
I'm wondering if Harry is the innocent party in this Zarate fiasco. Has this got Sir Les fingerprints all over it? Whoever it is should be collecting his P45 tomorrow morning. | | | |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:20 - Feb 2 with 1936 views | DejR_vu | Why didn't we just get Jarvis in the first place? This lot really can't see past the next game, much less plan for the future. Farcical. | |
| |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:22 - Feb 2 with 1750 views | DejR_vu |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:17 - Feb 2 by HollowayRanger | could always buy him instead! |
Indeed, why not buy him for the same as the loan fee, and have an 'agreement' in place to sell him back at the end of the season? | |
| |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:23 - Feb 2 with 1735 views | derbyhoop | Zarate is no longer "in the managers plans". | |
| "Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the Earth all one's lifetime." (Mark Twain)
Find me on twitter @derbyhoop and now on Bluesky |
| |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:23 - Feb 2 with 1734 views | Jigsore | | |
| “The thing about football - the important thing about football - is that it is not just about football.†|
| |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:24 - Feb 2 with 1719 views | daveB |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:19 - Feb 2 by stevec | I'm wondering if Harry is the innocent party in this Zarate fiasco. Has this got Sir Les fingerprints all over it? Whoever it is should be collecting his P45 tomorrow morning. |
Guilty party is the idiot who signed Zarate never played him then tried to sack him off so he could sign anyone on deadline day | | | |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:26 - Feb 2 with 1684 views | nadera78 |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:19 - Feb 2 by stevec | I'm wondering if Harry is the innocent party in this Zarate fiasco. Has this got Sir Les fingerprints all over it? Whoever it is should be collecting his P45 tomorrow morning. |
Some people will do anything to defend Redknapp. | | | |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:28 - Feb 2 with 1650 views | wombat |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:23 - Feb 2 by derbyhoop | Zarate is no longer "in the managers plans". |
We are such a week run football club aren't we | |
| |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:46 - Feb 2 with 1554 views | stevec |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:24 - Feb 2 by daveB | Guilty party is the idiot who signed Zarate never played him then tried to sack him off so he could sign anyone on deadline day |
Outwardly it appears that way but I'm getting the feeling HR has been taken off transfer duty now Les is getting a more prominent role. Someone has fcked up big time signing an unfit player under such a limited loan structure and that points towards those calling the shots financially and I don't think HR has that remit. I would have thought the Director of football operations might be where the buck stops on FA rulings rather than the manager. | | | |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:49 - Feb 2 with 1510 views | PinnerPaul |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:46 - Feb 2 by stevec | Outwardly it appears that way but I'm getting the feeling HR has been taken off transfer duty now Les is getting a more prominent role. Someone has fcked up big time signing an unfit player under such a limited loan structure and that points towards those calling the shots financially and I don't think HR has that remit. I would have thought the Director of football operations might be where the buck stops on FA rulings rather than the manager. |
You won't get much support for that theory on here! | | | |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:53 - Feb 2 with 1457 views | RangersDave |
Matt Jarvis? on 21:57 - Feb 2 by Maggsinho | Different rules in the SPL? Dunno. |
Smells a bit just after giving them a £10m loan last week to keep them afloat eh? | |
| |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:59 - Feb 2 with 1408 views | stevec |
Matt Jarvis? on 22:49 - Feb 2 by PinnerPaul | You won't get much support for that theory on here! |
True enough, but the idea that HR is to blame for overseeing medicals, loan agreements and basic administration is ridiculous and has to be challenged. | | | |
| |