By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Kirsty Wark was just one of the accusers. I’d also say that her relationship with the people she interviews are different from the ones Wallace has in his shows. It’s all about the power dynamic.
Some seem to have become hung up about the older allegations, ignoring the more recent ones that were dismissed by bosses (not the BBC in the case of Masterchef as it’s made by another company).
It’s not a case of being found guilty either. You don’t have to break the law to be dismissed.
There'll be lots of reasons these women didn't come forward at the time.
- Maybe they thought they wouldn't be believed (not surprising with what's come to light recently) - Maybe they were worried they'd be branded a troublemaker and lose out on work - Maybe the power dynamic between them and the star of the show presented a problem - Maybe they thought they were the ony one - Maybe they were embarrassed - Maybe they didn't want to spoil the show
We don't know. What we do know is victim blaming can also contibute to these things coming to light.
It seems to be part of a bigger push to try and tell us that during a cost of living crisis, the group who need help the most are those who are wealthy.
Just point to the small (relatively) number in that group who aren’t and ask for sympathy.
New figures out yesterday showing record numbers of children are homeless. Very little about this in the news.
I think (and hope) that by the time the number of farms affected take on financial advice to final number should be quite small. The knock on effect should be that farmland prices fall and become less attractive to those wanting to use it as a tax break.
The upsides of not means testing taxes are that it’s hard to evade and is easier to administer.
The downside is that there will be some at the lower end who are really hit hard.
See also the removal of the winter fuel allowance.
While I totally accept that a small percentage of farmers are going to me hit by IHT and and a relatively small number of pensioners are going to be adversely affected by the WFA cut, I am surprised the level of sympathy given to some of the most well off members of society while others get the short shrift.
I wouldn’t have quite phrased it like that but certainly it’s far more comes now for families to have both parents out to work, often for longer hours and less pay than our European counterparts.
Add into this the practical privatisation of the care industry making in a cash cow for hedge funds (as are children’s homes and SEN schools but that’s a different conversation) and we end up with a perfect storm.