The Hughes revolution 14:46 - Mar 10 with 3656 views | Tizzer | Amazing. Warnock out anyone? | | | | |
The Hughes revolution on 14:56 - Mar 10 with 2359 views | RobbyQPR | I got a feeling now, Hughes will walk 6 or 7 games into next season in the Championship with Barton, Cisse , Zamora, Taiwo, Taraabt all leaving in the summer. plus I think it will be a couple of years to build a team to gel before we come back up again. Fernandes said he was going to stick around. Personally I dont think Hughes or half the players are right for the Club | | | |
The Hughes revolution on 14:59 - Mar 10 with 2342 views | JAPRANGERS |
The Hughes revolution on 14:56 - Mar 10 by RobbyQPR | I got a feeling now, Hughes will walk 6 or 7 games into next season in the Championship with Barton, Cisse , Zamora, Taiwo, Taraabt all leaving in the summer. plus I think it will be a couple of years to build a team to gel before we come back up again. Fernandes said he was going to stick around. Personally I dont think Hughes or half the players are right for the Club |
Well I certainly hope Barton is off as soon as possible. Next year in the Championship will surely be much better than this miserable, highly depressing season | | | |
The Hughes revolution on 15:05 - Mar 10 with 2325 views | Tizzer |
The Hughes revolution on 14:56 - Mar 10 by RobbyQPR | I got a feeling now, Hughes will walk 6 or 7 games into next season in the Championship with Barton, Cisse , Zamora, Taiwo, Taraabt all leaving in the summer. plus I think it will be a couple of years to build a team to gel before we come back up again. Fernandes said he was going to stick around. Personally I dont think Hughes or half the players are right for the Club |
I suspect Hughes will walk this season in order to keep his reputation in tact and cite some invented boardroom deceit as the reason. | | | |
The Hughes revolution on 15:13 - Mar 10 with 2302 views | corse | never should have signed him and the sooner he goes the better for qpr. this season is done and prepare to spend next two season in championship. i do hope we start to build up for a good championship team by sacking him the first thing in may. if not earlier. jebus ... i must open a beer and calm down. [Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
| | | |
The Hughes revolution on 18:52 - Mar 10 with 2257 views | coolranger |
The Hughes revolution on 14:56 - Mar 10 by RobbyQPR | I got a feeling now, Hughes will walk 6 or 7 games into next season in the Championship with Barton, Cisse , Zamora, Taiwo, Taraabt all leaving in the summer. plus I think it will be a couple of years to build a team to gel before we come back up again. Fernandes said he was going to stick around. Personally I dont think Hughes or half the players are right for the Club |
I got a hunch you might be right my friend. | | | |
The Hughes revolution on 18:59 - Mar 10 with 2237 views | HollowayRanger | i for one always said keep warnock he deserved this season and even if we went down who better to bring us up again! but as usual 15 years of nothing counts for for just that nothing as people want to sack the guy who got us back here in less then 6 months chairmen included we are where we derserve to be i cant wait for next season we'll be champions! i thought the same thing last time we were religated didnt think it take 15 years to happen mind! QPR champions 2026/27 anyone? | |
| |
The Hughes revolution on 19:02 - Mar 10 with 2237 views | CanadaRanger | I don't think Hughes can inspire the way Warnock can, but both are very good managers. We've lost Warnock. I loved having him at the club, but he's gone and he isn't coming back. Hughes is better than most out there and I like his use of stats to help judge and improve player performances. It's not his fault that players take stupid red cards or a referee and linesmen have a blind moment and fail to award a goal. Short of lacing up a pair of boots again, Hughes can only manage. We've seen what trouble changing horses causes. Hughes is good enough and way better than some that passed though the doors of LR under the previous administration. Having said that, Hughes needs to shake some reality into the side. Changing the Captain would be a good start. Barton's performances (passing stats etc) could improve if he doesn't have the pressure of the arm band and is just allowed to play. If his stats improve to the same level as Derry, then he deserves to keep his place in the starting eleven. Giving up one out of three passes to the opposition is not acceptable and clearly something is affecting his game. | | | |
The Hughes revolution on 19:03 - Mar 10 with 2234 views | Gloucs_R | I suspect a number of players have relegation release clauses but I reckon Sparky will stay. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
The Hughes revolution on 21:54 - Mar 10 with 2164 views | kropotkin41 | It's a bit pointless blaming MH for our woes this season - if he stays next year then fair play I'll give the man credit for sticking at the task and I reckon he'll see us back up (given that TF is being honest about his intentions). What I would love to think is that when NW comes to LR next year (as now seems pretty much inevitable unless he retires) he'll get a rousing cheer and an ovation from the Rs fans for the great memories he gave us all before this Prem nightmare began. | |
| ‘morbid curiosity about where this is all going’ |
| |
The Hughes revolution on 22:28 - Mar 10 with 2142 views | WestonsuperR | 1 win in 9 Prem games for Hughes is an absolute disgrace considering we have played no team better than Newcastle. Hughes reputation as a Manager is being badly damaged by all this so let's hope he's somewhere near as gutted as we all are...but I doubt it. I have a tiny consolation that I am being proven right that we should not have sacked Warnock and anyone who wanted him to go should now be throughly embarrassed. | | | |
The Hughes revolution on 22:32 - Mar 10 with 2138 views | CHUBBS |
The Hughes revolution on 22:28 - Mar 10 by WestonsuperR | 1 win in 9 Prem games for Hughes is an absolute disgrace considering we have played no team better than Newcastle. Hughes reputation as a Manager is being badly damaged by all this so let's hope he's somewhere near as gutted as we all are...but I doubt it. I have a tiny consolation that I am being proven right that we should not have sacked Warnock and anyone who wanted him to go should now be throughly embarrassed. |
Thats what happens when a non football man makes a panicky decision and sacks a quality manager.I like Hughes but think he's no better than NW but its cost uur club a fortune to realise it. | | | |
The Hughes revolution on 23:12 - Mar 10 with 2114 views | baz_qpr |
The Hughes revolution on 22:28 - Mar 10 by WestonsuperR | 1 win in 9 Prem games for Hughes is an absolute disgrace considering we have played no team better than Newcastle. Hughes reputation as a Manager is being badly damaged by all this so let's hope he's somewhere near as gutted as we all are...but I doubt it. I have a tiny consolation that I am being proven right that we should not have sacked Warnock and anyone who wanted him to go should now be throughly embarrassed. |
In the main its Warnocks team mate. Hughes signed Onoura, Cisse and Zamora better than what we have, loaned Diakete and Taiwo both of who will probably go back at the end of the season. Apart from buying wholesale a new team I'm not sure what he could have done. Warnock won one game at home against a 9 man Chelsea. If he had not won that game I doubt he would have even got to Christmas. Warnock signed Barton and SWP two of the most disappointing signings since Mark Hately. The Faurlin injury was the nail in the coffin for this season, to lose your lynchpin midfield player, Hughes has never had access to him, absolutely crucial. Add to this the total collapse in form of our keeper since November I dont actually think their were many people calling for Warnock to go, but many recognise that its a results business and were it not for those early away wins we would have been dead and buried some time ago | | | |
The Hughes revolution on 23:25 - Mar 10 with 2093 views | WestonsuperR |
The Hughes revolution on 23:12 - Mar 10 by baz_qpr | In the main its Warnocks team mate. Hughes signed Onoura, Cisse and Zamora better than what we have, loaned Diakete and Taiwo both of who will probably go back at the end of the season. Apart from buying wholesale a new team I'm not sure what he could have done. Warnock won one game at home against a 9 man Chelsea. If he had not won that game I doubt he would have even got to Christmas. Warnock signed Barton and SWP two of the most disappointing signings since Mark Hately. The Faurlin injury was the nail in the coffin for this season, to lose your lynchpin midfield player, Hughes has never had access to him, absolutely crucial. Add to this the total collapse in form of our keeper since November I dont actually think their were many people calling for Warnock to go, but many recognise that its a results business and were it not for those early away wins we would have been dead and buried some time ago |
'It's Warnocks team' so if Hughes had a been a success all credit would have stayed with Warnock as it was his team? 'SWP and Barton both Warnocks buys' Hughes keeps playing them, he's the Manager and he doesn't have to. Warnock won 4 matches and kept us out of the bottom 3, doubt very much if Hughes will be able to do either. Bet Warnock is having a little chuckle at our expense and I wouldn't blame him. | | | |
The Hughes revolution on 23:49 - Mar 10 with 2077 views | baz_qpr |
The Hughes revolution on 23:25 - Mar 10 by WestonsuperR | 'It's Warnocks team' so if Hughes had a been a success all credit would have stayed with Warnock as it was his team? 'SWP and Barton both Warnocks buys' Hughes keeps playing them, he's the Manager and he doesn't have to. Warnock won 4 matches and kept us out of the bottom 3, doubt very much if Hughes will be able to do either. Bet Warnock is having a little chuckle at our expense and I wouldn't blame him. |
There is nothing else, the cupboard is bare, in midfield. Hughes got us two forwards that we would not have been able to sign otherwise. But the entire spine of the side behind them is very very weak. How exactly was he supposed to strengthen it without a bottomless pit of money. Again I ask you what was he supposed to do. People clamoured for 4-4-2 but we have never had the players to play it. We now have the forwards but we don't have the midfield. Dave Mc wrote a superb article last year about how many of Warnocks signings, Adel, Derry, Smith, Mackie etc were players that suited the 4-2-3-1/4-3-3 style formations but were not suited to an authordox 4-4-2 . What is there to laugh at because the guy taking over is doing just as bad as he was. The chairman has put a lot of money in I think in a run of 1 win 12 he was well within his prerogative to try and do something about it | | | |
The Hughes revolution (n/t) on 23:53 - Mar 10 with 2072 views | Brightonhoop | It's a huge step up to this division. Foolhams 6-0 demolition of us really underlined it. With Warnock and now Hughes results aren't good, nor is our luck. [Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
| | | |
The Hughes revolution on 00:06 - Mar 11 with 2047 views | WestonsuperR |
The Hughes revolution on 23:49 - Mar 10 by baz_qpr | There is nothing else, the cupboard is bare, in midfield. Hughes got us two forwards that we would not have been able to sign otherwise. But the entire spine of the side behind them is very very weak. How exactly was he supposed to strengthen it without a bottomless pit of money. Again I ask you what was he supposed to do. People clamoured for 4-4-2 but we have never had the players to play it. We now have the forwards but we don't have the midfield. Dave Mc wrote a superb article last year about how many of Warnocks signings, Adel, Derry, Smith, Mackie etc were players that suited the 4-2-3-1/4-3-3 style formations but were not suited to an authordox 4-4-2 . What is there to laugh at because the guy taking over is doing just as bad as he was. The chairman has put a lot of money in I think in a run of 1 win 12 he was well within his prerogative to try and do something about it |
We were out of the bottom 3 when Hughes took over and he was given a huge amount of money to spend on January so Hughes has failed miserably. I can't see how Warnock could possibly have done any worse considering the budget in Jan and the fact we have been playing the 'weaker' teams in the division. | | | |
The Hughes revolution (n/t) on 00:07 - Mar 11 with 2046 views | baz_qpr |
The Hughes revolution (n/t) on 23:53 - Mar 10 by Brightonhoop | It's a huge step up to this division. Foolhams 6-0 demolition of us really underlined it. With Warnock and now Hughes results aren't good, nor is our luck. [Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
|
Yes but not for Norwich and Swansea why they built teams. We built a team around two individuals one is now injured for half the season and the other wasted half the season because we tried to sell him and he was unfit etc. We had team spirit though. But given that we were built that way we then introduce into the dressing room a shed load of new people some who were disruptive, some in decline but on huge wages etc and that has been a disaster for us. The losses of Routledge and Gorks should not be underplayed either and whilst we dont know how much Briatore influenced those, Warnock as great as he was in the championship has to take responsibility for the players he bought and the way the dressing room was managed thereafter. | | | |
The Hughes revolution on 00:17 - Mar 11 with 2028 views | baz_qpr |
The Hughes revolution on 00:06 - Mar 11 by WestonsuperR | We were out of the bottom 3 when Hughes took over and he was given a huge amount of money to spend on January so Hughes has failed miserably. I can't see how Warnock could possibly have done any worse considering the budget in Jan and the fact we have been playing the 'weaker' teams in the division. |
On goal difference with one win in 13 and 1 home win all season in a very special game against 9 men. Three players we have bought are all better than we had, the 2 loanees are not great. Warnock signed Macheda on loan the targets we were hearing about Johnson, Yakubo, Tim Cahill not exactly inspiring. Dont get me wrong I'm no hughes fanboy but if it was my 40M I would have probably chosen to intervene and if it were not for the Chelsea game it might have been earlier | | | |
The Hughes revolution on 00:42 - Mar 11 with 2008 views | Northernr | Some notable poster names missing from this thread. Posters who were semi-regular and then suddenly all at one bombarded every thread with the same anti-Warnock rhetoric for weeks. Where are these people now one wonders? Welcome to the other side of the fence chaps. This grass isn't up to much is it? [Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
| | | |
The Hughes revolution on 01:04 - Mar 11 with 1991 views | essextaxiboy | Warnock wouldnt have attracted these players . If he had he would have got more from them IMO . Who Knows who he would have signed .. its all guesswork. A phrase I hate but,, we are where we are. Lets get on with it | | | |
The Hughes revolution on 01:22 - Mar 11 with 1982 views | ingeminate |
The Hughes revolution on 00:42 - Mar 11 by Northernr | Some notable poster names missing from this thread. Posters who were semi-regular and then suddenly all at one bombarded every thread with the same anti-Warnock rhetoric for weeks. Where are these people now one wonders? Welcome to the other side of the fence chaps. This grass isn't up to much is it? [Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
|
I think the general response to Warnock leaving was apathy. 90% of rangers IMO thought it was a bit unfair but that going off recent perfomances he'd lost the dresing room. Warnock signed Barton. Did for him. For what it's worth Hughes is not QPR I don't think he's a dreadful manager, but I don't think he's ever going to be someone we relate to. In recent times our best managers have been 'wear hearts on the sleeve' Holloway and Warnock, before that Gerry Francis, more reserved but a rangers legend. Hughes is doing what he can, for me it won't be enough think now we will go down and I think he'll leave, right now I'm just gutted but not angry. Though I would really appreciate it if players tracked their runners, just now and then, mix it up a bit lads. | |
| |
The Hughes revolution on 03:13 - Mar 11 with 1945 views | FDC | There's some real silly shit on this thread. I actually came home today and watched 4 year plan just for the end bit to cheer me up, but lets break this down. - we all love Warnock - he didn't know what to do (we all still love him though, we can do that cos we're intelligent, love some one but understand their limitations - anyone here married?) - TF and chums rolled the dice cos we were shit and going down - we rolled a 1 gutted like | | | |
The Hughes revolution on 05:03 - Mar 11 with 1920 views | denhamhoop2 |
The Hughes revolution on 03:13 - Mar 11 by FDC | There's some real silly shit on this thread. I actually came home today and watched 4 year plan just for the end bit to cheer me up, but lets break this down. - we all love Warnock - he didn't know what to do (we all still love him though, we can do that cos we're intelligent, love some one but understand their limitations - anyone here married?) - TF and chums rolled the dice cos we were shit and going down - we rolled a 1 gutted like |
I wouldn't have sacked NW because i just didnt think we would get anyone better,IMHO Hughes is another Fergie darling who because he played at Man U will always get jobs because of name and profile.Hughes keeps trying to play 4 4 2 without a left midfielder and a right winger who just has no confidence.My problem is there are certain players who seem guaranteed a place no matter what their performances are.Last season we had just 1 real injury all season so it was almost a certainty we would have more this season. | | | |
The Hughes revolution on 07:55 - Mar 11 with 1890 views | corse | well i wasnt fully behind warnock anymore after the horrid nov-dec period and had thoughts that if we were to survive in the prem we might should try something else. and we did. but i didn thought they will go for hughes who was the worst possible choice if not counting mr hart. ok i thought lets see what happens. and what happened? he brought in some players all more or less bench warmers in their teams, changed the tactics, lost anykind of discipline in the team, dont know the simple basics of man marking and area playing, bombarding the forwards with long ball to no one, kept barton as a captain which is a mistake, and all and all proved to be just that incompetent manager i thought he ll be and i think he lost the trust of the players well before yesterday. he has had his change to turn the boat around now he can just fxxc off and lets try something else and before next season cause if he gets the sack now we will have time to build a new team under new reign. [Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
| | | |
The Hughes revolution on 08:18 - Mar 11 with 1877 views | hoopstilidie |
The Hughes revolution on 00:42 - Mar 11 by Northernr | Some notable poster names missing from this thread. Posters who were semi-regular and then suddenly all at one bombarded every thread with the same anti-Warnock rhetoric for weeks. Where are these people now one wonders? Welcome to the other side of the fence chaps. This grass isn't up to much is it? [Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
|
They were full of crap then as I continually argued and they will still be full of crap now. | |
| |
| |