| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 08:11 - Jan 5 with 1744 views | Whiterockin |
I did say a couple of weeks ago I can see him going to Birmingham when they go up. |  | |  |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 09:18 - Jan 5 with 1668 views | onehunglow |
Thanks and there’s the door Harry.
I
Now who comes in |  |
| |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 09:24 - Jan 5 with 1652 views | heatwave |
Any potential suitors watching yesterday will be in for him.
Going sideways is no issue if your wages increase considerably.
Well it wouldn't be for me anyway. |  | | |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 10:05 - Jan 5 with 1579 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
Sorry to see him go but take the money. There should be a significant differential between his value and Joe Low. Crack on and start wheeling and dealing. |  |
| |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 10:08 - Jan 5 with 1565 views | onehunglow |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 10:05 - Jan 5 by ReslovenSwan1 |
Sorry to see him go but take the money. There should be a significant differential between his value and Joe Low. Crack on and start wheeling and dealing. |
We would miss him very badly right now .
But yeah,the differtial should / must see him replaced by Low
Question is, how good is Low ? | |
| |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 10:26 - Jan 5 with 1528 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 10:08 - Jan 5 by onehunglow |
We would miss him very badly right now .
But yeah,the differtial should / must see him replaced by Low
Question is, how good is Low ? |
That is what recruitment is for. He is big and strong. 4 year deal with option for another. Cabango is now experienced. Losing one CB is not great but both would have been very disruptive. | |
| |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 10:32 - Jan 5 with 1516 views | onehunglow |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 10:26 - Jan 5 by ReslovenSwan1 |
That is what recruitment is for. He is big and strong. 4 year deal with option for another. Cabango is now experienced. Losing one CB is not great but both would have been very disruptive. |
I’d rather him simply as a big stopper/ defender rather than one implored to play dumbarse on his own six yard box | |
| |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 16:28 - Jan 5 with 1303 views | max936 |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 10:08 - Jan 5 by onehunglow |
We would miss him very badly right now .
But yeah,the differtial should / must see him replaced by Low
Question is, how good is Low ? |
Of course we'd miss him only the daft amongst us would think otherwise, he was a colossus yesterday doing his own graft and covering Christie who shouldn't play again for us and probably wouldn't have if it wasn't for the previous clowns that were running the club and running it into the ground at that! |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 22:26 - Jan 5 with 1170 views | STID2017 |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 10:05 - Jan 5 by ReslovenSwan1 |
Sorry to see him go but take the money. There should be a significant differential between his value and Joe Low. Crack on and start wheeling and dealing. |
We have no idea how good Low is.
Darling was a one man defence yesterday
He should be persuaded to stay at all costs |  |
| |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 00:11 - Jan 6 with 1087 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 22:26 - Jan 5 by STID2017 |
We have no idea how good Low is.
Darling was a one man defence yesterday
He should be persuaded to stay at all costs |
He will cost £65,000 a week in wages and devaluation any if he stays. He is not Vidic and Swansea cannot afford to lose that money. If he wanted to stay he would have signed like Cabango.
He can and will be replaced | |
| |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 05:11 - Jan 6 with 1009 views | STID2017 |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 00:11 - Jan 6 by ReslovenSwan1 |
He will cost £65,000 a week in wages and devaluation any if he stays. He is not Vidic and Swansea cannot afford to lose that money. If he wanted to stay he would have signed like Cabango.
He can and will be replaced |
Any player can be replaced.
Christie can replace him.
Being an adequate replacement is a totally different matter though | |
| |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 06:22 - Jan 6 with 983 views | Whiterockin |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 00:11 - Jan 6 by ReslovenSwan1 |
He will cost £65,000 a week in wages and devaluation any if he stays. He is not Vidic and Swansea cannot afford to lose that money. If he wanted to stay he would have signed like Cabango.
He can and will be replaced |
There is no devaluation of £65K a week if nobody is prepared to pay £1M for him, just his wages. We refused to pay less than that in January for excellent players with 6 months left on their contracts. | | | |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 09:09 - Jan 6 with 870 views | jack247 |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 00:11 - Jan 6 by ReslovenSwan1 |
He will cost £65,000 a week in wages and devaluation any if he stays. He is not Vidic and Swansea cannot afford to lose that money. If he wanted to stay he would have signed like Cabango.
He can and will be replaced |
There was a lot of talk of that until Luke Williams little episode.
I don’t know how accurate it was, but a lot of people were under the impression he was on the verge of signing.
Of course, any presentation about the direction the club is heading and what Williams wants to do with the squad is null and void now.
We’re probably lucky Cabango signed when he did. | | | |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 14:07 - Jan 6 with 576 views | GVJack |
We won't truly know until he's embedded in the team and has time to develop. We didn't know how well Monk or Williams would be for us, but both established themselves as fantastic players and leaders for the club.
As for where darling goes, to be honest, if he's not going to remain with us, I couldn't give two hours where he ends up (so long as it's not Cardiff). You'd like to think he'd back himself with a move to a strong championship or premiership club, but he can go and play for Accrington Stanley for all I care. And I don't mean that with any animosity. He's fulfilled his side of the bargain by seeing our his contract (I'm not aware of him sending out come and get me pleas to other clubs or going on strike) so he's free to do whatever he wants and what is right for him and his family.
The fact he will walk on a free after and have his peak years at another club after the time we've invested in developing him isn't down to Darling. IF the club wanted to retain him long terms he should have been offered better terms and tied down 18 months ago when he had two years left on his contract. If we could extend him, then that gave us more windows and opportunities to cash in on him and re-invest that money back into the squad. The blame lays more at the club IMO but hopefully (expensive) lessons will have been learnt with the new ownership group coming in. | | | |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 15:37 - Jan 6 with 476 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 14:07 - Jan 6 by GVJack |
We won't truly know until he's embedded in the team and has time to develop. We didn't know how well Monk or Williams would be for us, but both established themselves as fantastic players and leaders for the club.
As for where darling goes, to be honest, if he's not going to remain with us, I couldn't give two hours where he ends up (so long as it's not Cardiff). You'd like to think he'd back himself with a move to a strong championship or premiership club, but he can go and play for Accrington Stanley for all I care. And I don't mean that with any animosity. He's fulfilled his side of the bargain by seeing our his contract (I'm not aware of him sending out come and get me pleas to other clubs or going on strike) so he's free to do whatever he wants and what is right for him and his family.
The fact he will walk on a free after and have his peak years at another club after the time we've invested in developing him isn't down to Darling. IF the club wanted to retain him long terms he should have been offered better terms and tied down 18 months ago when he had two years left on his contract. If we could extend him, then that gave us more windows and opportunities to cash in on him and re-invest that money back into the squad. The blame lays more at the club IMO but hopefully (expensive) lessons will have been learnt with the new ownership group coming in. |
Blame is not an appropriate word. The club felt that if they offered him great money he would sign. The could no more able to force him out q18 month a ago as they can now. Little has changed. Swansea will get less but on the other hand he has kept SCFC out of relegation trouble.
Bite the bullet and get what they can for him now. He can sit tight but that was always the case.
Swansea may prefer to let him run down his deal. It with cost them £65k a week. He will be gone. | |
| |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 15:48 - Jan 6 with 442 views | Whiterockin |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 15:37 - Jan 6 by ReslovenSwan1 |
Blame is not an appropriate word. The club felt that if they offered him great money he would sign. The could no more able to force him out q18 month a ago as they can now. Little has changed. Swansea will get less but on the other hand he has kept SCFC out of relegation trouble.
Bite the bullet and get what they can for him now. He can sit tight but that was always the case.
Swansea may prefer to let him run down his deal. It with cost them £65k a week. He will be gone. |
He will not cost £65K a week it is a fictional figure you have made up. He will cost his normal wages no more, unless he or the club don't accept an offer if there is one. So two massive IFs if an offer is made an if it is declined, stop spreading false information yet again. | | | |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 06:07 - Jan 7 with 180 views | KeithHaynes |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 00:11 - Jan 6 by ReslovenSwan1 |
He will cost £65,000 a week in wages and devaluation any if he stays. He is not Vidic and Swansea cannot afford to lose that money. If he wanted to stay he would have signed like Cabango.
He can and will be replaced |
The last thing we heard and reported was Harry was being offered £12,500 a week,£50,000 a month.
For us that’s the limit the Swans will go to atm.
This could drag on. |  |
| |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 08:56 - Jan 7 with 103 views | STID2017 |
| The Harry darling rumours begin 😡 on 15:48 - Jan 6 by Whiterockin |
He will not cost £65K a week it is a fictional figure you have made up. He will cost his normal wages no more, unless he or the club don't accept an offer if there is one. So two massive IFs if an offer is made an if it is declined, stop spreading false information yet again. |
Keith says he was offered about £12.5 k a week ( which I believe )
Makes Res's £65k per week sound ridiculous ( which of course it is ) | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
