| New Deal for Armstrong? 14:34 - Oct 5 with 6038 views | BrianMcCarthy |
Sub-Standard also reporting this. Wonder if there's anything to it.
|  |
| |  |
| New Deal for Armstrong? on 05:25 - Oct 6 with 1317 views | SydneyRs |
This isn't the worst idea. He wouldn't have been on much and still probably won't be on huge wages even under a new deal. Meanwhile we get him tied down for a yew years so if he does improve we get to profit from it. |  | | |
| New Deal for Armstrong? on 07:03 - Oct 6 with 1227 views | PlanetHonneywood |
| New Deal for Armstrong? on 21:00 - Oct 5 by QPRSteve |
What's wrong with some of the people on this board? He's 19 and showing plenty of potential. I remember Les Ferdinand being regarded as useless when he first got near the first team and look what happened to him!
Some people on here seem to think you must be world class before you can break into our first team. Give the lad some leeway. He's a fantastic prospect.
I can see the same criticism coming Rayan Kolli's way soon. |
When you say '...useless when he got near the first team...' you're referring to his time as a player and not a DOF? |  |
| |
| New Deal for Armstrong? on 09:35 - Oct 6 with 1076 views | CateLeBonR |
Sounds like a good idea. Hope he signs. |  | | |
| New Deal for Armstrong? on 11:52 - Oct 6 with 939 views | QPunkR |
Can't believe there's any dissenting voices to this. If nothing else, it just means that if anyone wants to come in and buy him at any point as he continues to develop, they'll have to pay cashmoney - which is something we sorely need at the moment. |  |
| |
| New Deal for Armstrong? on 15:20 - Oct 6 with 798 views | Monkey_Roots |
I notice Damo has been through the thread with his red pen - up voting and down voting with gay abandon... not offered an opinion of his own though?
Maybe he hasn't seen him play yet. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
