| TOMMY ROBINSON 07:42 - May 26 with 74588 views | getcarter |
Not a fan but his arrest yesterday challenges freedom of speech.
This post has been edited by an administrator |  | | |  |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 15:02 - May 30 with 1748 views | controversial_jack |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 13:57 - May 30 by Highjack |
Judge: “Mr Yaxley how do you plead?”
Tommy: “Guilty bruv, it’s a fair cop I definitely dunnit”
Tommy’s fans: “it’s a outrage! Conspiracy! Riot!” |
Apparently, and this is as much as we are permitted to know, It was done so quickly that he wasn't allowed time to get his own solicitor and was allocated a duty solicitor.He was advised to plead guilty, get a slap on the wrist and be off home within a few weeks or so, but It didn't work out like that.The more perceptive of us can work out why | | | |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 15:14 - May 30 with 1734 views | Lohengrin |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 13:36 - May 30 by londonlisa2001 |
Reporting restrictions were in place, he broke them once and was given a suspended sentence and warned that what he was doing could not be repeated. He did repeat it, broke the terms of the suspension of his sentence, admitted he was guilty, he’s in prison. Justice done. |
Only now catching up with all this - just got up from an eighth 12-hour night shift on the bounce and I’m slurring and reeling a bit like a drunk. I’m getting too old for this... 
Right then, a couple of things, the Huddersfield Examiner journalist Stephanie Finnegan (already cited on this thread) was on Radio 4 this morning and let something interesting slip. She was one of two ‘proper’ reporters outside of the court and was saying that prior to Tom commencing his streaming schtick he had enquired of the police present if he was “alright to crack on, this isn’t breaking any laws, is it?” Having been given the nod he was off and running. Now it was clear from the interview segment that Finnegan has about as much time for Tom as you do but she seemed to think there was something ‘off’ about the sequence of events.
Regardless of what anybody thinks of Tom or what they think he stands for to be arrested, charged and gaoled within the space of what, four to five hours speaks to me of Home Office orchestration and is reminiscent of one of two things: either a Field Court Martial or the Star Chamber, this isn’t modern due process as anybody knows it.
Stay away from central London on the 9th and 10th of June, love. It’s going to be bedlam up there, come home to visit Mam for a couple of days. |  |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 15:40 - May 30 with 1682 views | controversial_jack |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 15:14 - May 30 by Lohengrin |
Only now catching up with all this - just got up from an eighth 12-hour night shift on the bounce and I’m slurring and reeling a bit like a drunk. I’m getting too old for this...
Right then, a couple of things, the Huddersfield Examiner journalist Stephanie Finnegan (already cited on this thread) was on Radio 4 this morning and let something interesting slip. She was one of two ‘proper’ reporters outside of the court and was saying that prior to Tom commencing his streaming schtick he had enquired of the police present if he was “alright to crack on, this isn’t breaking any laws, is it?” Having been given the nod he was off and running. Now it was clear from the interview segment that Finnegan has about as much time for Tom as you do but she seemed to think there was something ‘off’ about the sequence of events.
Regardless of what anybody thinks of Tom or what they think he stands for to be arrested, charged and gaoled within the space of what, four to five hours speaks to me of Home Office orchestration and is reminiscent of one of two things: either a Field Court Martial or the Star Chamber, this isn’t modern due process as anybody knows it.
Stay away from central London on the 9th and 10th of June, love. It’s going to be bedlam up there, come home to visit Mam for a couple of days. |
That's correct, he did ask the police present if he was ok, and they said he was.It can be heard on the extended video | | | |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 15:42 - May 30 with 1679 views | Lohengrin |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 15:27 - May 30 by FerrisBuellerJB |
At last someone else looking at it from a neutral down the middle viewpoint and not influenced by who he is rather than the events that happened. The last time I saw someone get arrested have a trial and be sentenced that quick I was watching Judge Dredd [Post edited 30 May 2018 15:29]
|
There’s something else happening here that seems a bit strange Tom is becoming the focal point for a lot of generalised working class resentment and frustration, I’m getting that just from conversations in work. It’s not a position he has sought nor particularly merits and not one he’s remotely capable of living up to. His isn’t the head the halo of fire should come to rest on.
A mass movement is beginning to coalesce without leadership and that has to be a first on these islands. Historically it has always been the other way around. You get the lone voice that starts to echo, then amplify. All we have now is a lot of angry shouting. | |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 15:43 - May 30 with 1676 views | Jango |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 13:36 - May 30 by londonlisa2001 |
Reporting restrictions were in place, he broke them once and was given a suspended sentence and warned that what he was doing could not be repeated. He did repeat it, broke the terms of the suspension of his sentence, admitted he was guilty, he’s in prison. Justice done. |
I don’t care whether he’s in prison or not the blokes a beauty. I pulled you up on your point about him being there may have resulted in the case being jeapordised. Load of bollocks. | | | |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 15:43 - May 30 with 1676 views | Lohengrin |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 15:40 - May 30 by controversial_jack |
That's correct, he did ask the police present if he was ok, and they said he was.It can be heard on the extended video |
There you go. They gave him the rope then hanged him. | |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 15:47 - May 30 with 1671 views | Glyn1 |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 15:14 - May 30 by Lohengrin |
Only now catching up with all this - just got up from an eighth 12-hour night shift on the bounce and I’m slurring and reeling a bit like a drunk. I’m getting too old for this...
Right then, a couple of things, the Huddersfield Examiner journalist Stephanie Finnegan (already cited on this thread) was on Radio 4 this morning and let something interesting slip. She was one of two ‘proper’ reporters outside of the court and was saying that prior to Tom commencing his streaming schtick he had enquired of the police present if he was “alright to crack on, this isn’t breaking any laws, is it?” Having been given the nod he was off and running. Now it was clear from the interview segment that Finnegan has about as much time for Tom as you do but she seemed to think there was something ‘off’ about the sequence of events.
Regardless of what anybody thinks of Tom or what they think he stands for to be arrested, charged and gaoled within the space of what, four to five hours speaks to me of Home Office orchestration and is reminiscent of one of two things: either a Field Court Martial or the Star Chamber, this isn’t modern due process as anybody knows it.
Stay away from central London on the 9th and 10th of June, love. It’s going to be bedlam up there, come home to visit Mam for a couple of days. |
streaming schtick he had enquired of the police present if he was “alright to crack on, this isn’t breaking any laws is it?"
And before asking that question did he tell the officer that he had been convicted of contempt of court and ordered by the Court to stay away? Like hell he did.
Robinson is a chancer gaming the system, he goes to jail for a few weeks and comes out several hundred thousand pounds richer because of increased avenue revenue on his YouTube account and donations from rich US alt-right groups. Heck, maybe even Lohengrin will send him a few quid.
Having fair trials is important, and this one could have been destroyed because of him.
Save your sympathies for the families of the 37 journalists and cameramen killed in 2017 reporting on events around the world. [Post edited 30 May 2018 15:48]
|  |
| |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 15:51 - May 30 with 1654 views | AlfieMooresSon |
Not a fan but his arrest yesterday challenges freedom of speech.
Totally agree | | | |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 15:52 - May 30 with 1651 views | Lohengrin |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 15:47 - May 30 by Glyn1 |
streaming schtick he had enquired of the police present if he was “alright to crack on, this isn’t breaking any laws is it?"
And before asking that question did he tell the officer that he had been convicted of contempt of court and ordered by the Court to stay away? Like hell he did.
Robinson is a chancer gaming the system, he goes to jail for a few weeks and comes out several hundred thousand pounds richer because of increased avenue revenue on his YouTube account and donations from rich US alt-right groups. Heck, maybe even Lohengrin will send him a few quid.
Having fair trials is important, and this one could have been destroyed because of him.
Save your sympathies for the families of the 37 journalists and cameramen killed in 2017 reporting on events around the world. [Post edited 30 May 2018 15:48]
|
Perhaps you are able to recant the conversation outside the court in its entirety? I am interested, Glyn, enlighten me. | |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 15:53 - May 30 with 1649 views | FerrisBuellerJB |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 15:42 - May 30 by Lohengrin |
There’s something else happening here that seems a bit strange Tom is becoming the focal point for a lot of generalised working class resentment and frustration, I’m getting that just from conversations in work. It’s not a position he has sought nor particularly merits and not one he’s remotely capable of living up to. His isn’t the head the halo of fire should come to rest on.
A mass movement is beginning to coalesce without leadership and that has to be a first on these islands. Historically it has always been the other way around. You get the lone voice that starts to echo, then amplify. All we have now is a lot of angry shouting. |
I totally agree I’ve not spoken to anyone who thinks what’s happened is good. To be fair the way the establishment have been acting it was only a matter of time before people got pushed too far. |  | | |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 15:55 - May 30 with 1642 views | controversial_jack |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 15:47 - May 30 by Glyn1 |
streaming schtick he had enquired of the police present if he was “alright to crack on, this isn’t breaking any laws is it?"
And before asking that question did he tell the officer that he had been convicted of contempt of court and ordered by the Court to stay away? Like hell he did.
Robinson is a chancer gaming the system, he goes to jail for a few weeks and comes out several hundred thousand pounds richer because of increased avenue revenue on his YouTube account and donations from rich US alt-right groups. Heck, maybe even Lohengrin will send him a few quid.
Having fair trials is important, and this one could have been destroyed because of him.
Save your sympathies for the families of the 37 journalists and cameramen killed in 2017 reporting on events around the world. [Post edited 30 May 2018 15:48]
|
He asked the cops if he was doing anything wrong and they said no, but minutes later he was arrested. It was irrelevant whether the officer knew about any previous offence, because he was arrested for breech of the peace, which a short while ago the officer said he hadn't commited | | | |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 16:12 - May 30 with 1598 views | Glyn1 |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 15:52 - May 30 by Lohengrin |
Perhaps you are able to recant the conversation outside the court in its entirety? I am interested, Glyn, enlighten me. |
You're the one who quoted it selectively. Give us all of it. | |
| |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 16:14 - May 30 with 1594 views | Lohengrin |
Mart6’s index finger is locked in rapid-fire mode, I see.  | |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 16:16 - May 30 with 1589 views | oh_tommy_tommy |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 15:45 - May 30 by Darran |
“looking at it from a neutral down the middle viewpoint and not influenced by who he is rather than the events that happened”
You’re new here aren’t you?  |
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 |  |
| |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 16:16 - May 30 with 1589 views | FerrisBuellerJB |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 16:14 - May 30 by Lohengrin |
Mart6’s index finger is locked in rapid-fire mode, I see. |
Who is this bute I feel like he’s stalking me | | | |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 16:20 - May 30 with 1580 views | Darran |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 16:14 - May 30 by Lohengrin |
Mart6’s index finger is locked in rapid-fire mode, I see. |
There’s nowt wrong with Mart he likes me. |  |
| |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 16:23 - May 30 with 1578 views | londonlisa2001 |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 15:02 - May 30 by controversial_jack |
Apparently, and this is as much as we are permitted to know, It was done so quickly that he wasn't allowed time to get his own solicitor and was allocated a duty solicitor.He was advised to plead guilty, get a slap on the wrist and be off home within a few weeks or so, but It didn't work out like that.The more perceptive of us can work out why |
I remember watching QI when Stephen Fry said to Alan Davies, ‘ Alan, virtually everything you say that starts with ‘apparently’ Is complete bollox’.
Again, the Secret Barrister sums this up better than could I:
“Yaxley-Lennon was defended by an experienced member of the independent criminal Bar. He may have been offered the duty solicitor at the police station if his chosen solicitor was not available, but in the Crown Court hearing he was advised and represented by a specialist criminal barrister with over 16 years of experience of cases including murder, people-trafficking, serious violence and serious sexual offences. As an independent barrister, this professional prosecutes as well as defends (most of us do), but his website profile in fact emphasises his experience as a defence advocate. In other words, Yaxley-Lennon had a top-notch defence barrister fighting his corner.”
The most perceptive look at the facts rather than listen to the inane ramblings of nutters on social media. | | | |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 16:23 - May 30 with 1577 views | Lohengrin |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 16:12 - May 30 by Glyn1 |
You're the one who quoted it selectively. Give us all of it. |
All I did was say exactly what the young girl has stated on The Today programme on Radio 4 at around half six this morning. She didn’t elaborate. I thought you knew more going off the tenor of your post? | |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 16:23 - May 30 with 1576 views | londonlisa2001 |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 14:58 - May 30 by controversial_jack |
He wasn't arrested for that, he was arrested for an alleged breech of the peace, there's a huge difference here |
It’s irrelevant. | | | |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 16:25 - May 30 with 1571 views | FerrisBuellerJB |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 16:23 - May 30 by londonlisa2001 |
I remember watching QI when Stephen Fry said to Alan Davies, ‘ Alan, virtually everything you say that starts with ‘apparently’ Is complete bollox’.
Again, the Secret Barrister sums this up better than could I:
“Yaxley-Lennon was defended by an experienced member of the independent criminal Bar. He may have been offered the duty solicitor at the police station if his chosen solicitor was not available, but in the Crown Court hearing he was advised and represented by a specialist criminal barrister with over 16 years of experience of cases including murder, people-trafficking, serious violence and serious sexual offences. As an independent barrister, this professional prosecutes as well as defends (most of us do), but his website profile in fact emphasises his experience as a defence advocate. In other words, Yaxley-Lennon had a top-notch defence barrister fighting his corner.”
The most perceptive look at the facts rather than listen to the inane ramblings of nutters on social media. |
The secret barrister also refers to Robinson’s supporters as knuckle draggers very professional | | | |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 16:26 - May 30 with 1569 views | Lohengrin |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 16:16 - May 30 by FerrisBuellerJB |
Who is this bute I feel like he’s stalking me |
If it is stalking Marty uses the scatter-gun approach, EVERYBODY cops it.
Every once in a while I’ll come out with something he approves of and I’ll earn myself an up-arrow. He likes to give me a Chinese burn then kiss it better. | |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 16:30 - May 30 with 1561 views | Lohengrin |
| TOMMY ROBINSON on 16:25 - May 30 by FerrisBuellerJB |
The secret barrister also refers to Robinson’s supporters as knuckle draggers very professional |
And demonstrations as “nazi marches.”
I’ve no way of knowing but I think he may just be a Corbynite... | |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
