| Mayweather v Pacman on 13:32 - Feb 15 with 3367 views | max936 |
Agreed, it'll still be a watchable event and you can't say that about some of the so called eagerly awaited fights over years.
On another boxing theme. I watched a re-run of Prizefighter earlier surprisingly good shows them fair play, also the Brian Rose v Carson Jones fight, not the first time for Ian John-lewis to be involved in a controversial decision, but he had a shocker last night. |  |
|  |
| Mayweather v Pacman on 13:40 - Feb 15 with 3365 views | C_jack |
| Mayweather v Pacman on 13:32 - Feb 15 by max936 |
Agreed, it'll still be a watchable event and you can't say that about some of the so called eagerly awaited fights over years.
On another boxing theme. I watched a re-run of Prizefighter earlier surprisingly good shows them fair play, also the Brian Rose v Carson Jones fight, not the first time for Ian John-lewis to be involved in a controversial decision, but he had a shocker last night. |
They're good shows because the fact that you've got 3 rounds means that somebody has to make something happen, defensive fighters are never going to be favoured.
I heard Rose wobbled Jones in the first round and the ref let it go, so in fairness surely the ref should have done the same the other way as well? I've not seen it though. |  |
| |
| Mayweather v Pacman on 13:52 - Feb 15 with 3355 views | max936 |
| Mayweather v Pacman on 13:40 - Feb 15 by C_jack |
They're good shows because the fact that you've got 3 rounds means that somebody has to make something happen, defensive fighters are never going to be favoured.
I heard Rose wobbled Jones in the first round and the ref let it go, so in fairness surely the ref should have done the same the other way as well? I've not seen it though. |
He was on dodgy legs but he was backing into the ropes when Lewis stopped it, but he might have regained his composure on the ropes or Jones might have finished it anyway, but he should have had a chance, Jones was wobbled, but he didn't react as badly as Rose did in fairness, but Rose did deserve a proper chance. | |
| |
| Mayweather v Pacman on 14:08 - Feb 15 with 3343 views | Parlay |
Already a thread on this. |  |
| |
| Mayweather v Pacman on 14:18 - Feb 15 with 3327 views | C_jack |
Go post on that one then. | |
| |
| Mayweather v Pacman on 14:46 - Feb 15 with 3306 views | Parlay |
| Mayweather v Pacman on 14:18 - Feb 15 by C_jack |
Go post on that one then. |
I did. Ive also posted on this one to tell you to get with the programme. | |
| |
| Mayweather v Pacman on 14:54 - Feb 15 with 3293 views | C_jack |
Are you high? Certainly nothing of the sort on my thread feed
Stop lying (sorry, I mean pretending) | |
| |
| Mayweather v Pacman on 15:10 - Feb 15 with 3287 views | Parlay |
| Mayweather v Pacman on 14:54 - Feb 15 by C_jack |
Are you high? Certainly nothing of the sort on my thread feed
Stop lying (sorry, I mean pretending) |
Yes, high-ly amused.
Its been discussed, the thread is already on here. Just because you cant see it doesnt mean you should resort to lying.
As i said, get with the programme. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Mayweather v Pacman on 15:20 - Feb 15 with 3278 views | C_jack |
Where is it then? | |
| |
| Mayweather v Pacman on 15:30 - Feb 15 with 3270 views | C_jack |
How strange. You're a few plums short of a fruit pie at the best of times but you're all over the place today. Try again. | |
| |
| Mayweather v Pacman on 15:40 - Feb 15 with 3260 views | Parlay |
| Mayweather v Pacman on 15:30 - Feb 15 by C_jack |
How strange. You're a few plums short of a fruit pie at the best of times but you're all over the place today. Try again. |
I take that as realisation then and falling back on your ever so tired technique of "discrediting to deflect".
Now get with the programme. | |
| |
| Mayweather v Pacman on 20:22 - Feb 16 with 3154 views | Swanjack10 |
arranged last year,build up,hype etc= loads of more millions. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
