| SACK THE BOARD 16:32 - Dec 1 with 52514 views | RAFC1907 |
Absolutely terrible.
No ambition, robbing fans constantly with overpriced entrance fees for watching garbage.
Garbage created by them for not backing the manager with any money, constantly pocketing it and saying we don't have any.
1600 home fans today says it all.
No wonder we will always be little old Rochdale.
Shambles of a football club. |  |
| |  |
| SACK THE BOARD on 10:10 - Dec 5 with 3288 views | sweetcorn |
It appears I missed quite the night, WhatsApp was down.
I don’t even know what to say to the pile of shite I’ve just read |  |
| Leader of the little gang of immature cretins. |
| |
| SACK THE BOARD on 10:23 - Dec 5 with 3246 views | kiwidale |
| SACK THE BOARD on 09:48 - Dec 5 by nordenblue |
You seem overly and pretty strangely cut up about this "clique" thing on here,could you write me a list of who's who and whos not in in this gang as I've not got it mapped out as well as you seem to have? |
You are taking it too seriously norden lad anyway its a secret clique, allegedly they are on Facebook sum'on on here spilled the beans. | |
| This is not the time for bickering.
|
| |
| SACK THE BOARD on 14:18 - Dec 5 with 2938 views | Cleedale |
| SACK THE BOARD on 09:54 - Dec 5 by D_Alien |
If he thought he was "in" the non-existent clique he'd be pulling his own middle stump |
Did his BAILS get dislodged in that incident or did the umpire call a NO BALL? | | | |
| SACK THE BOARD on 14:39 - Dec 5 with 2892 views | rochdaleriddler |
So are all the breaches of these rules going to be sanctioned in any way? |  |
| |
| SACK THE BOARD on 14:45 - Dec 5 with 2880 views | DaleiLama |
| SACK THE BOARD on 14:18 - Dec 5 by Cleedale |
Did his BAILS get dislodged in that incident or did the umpire call a NO BALL? |
I strongly suspect the allegation of ball-tampering will be proven, so it's moot. |  |
| |
| SACK THE BOARD on 15:00 - Dec 5 with 2847 views | James1980 |
| SACK THE BOARD on 14:45 - Dec 5 by DaleiLama |
I strongly suspect the allegation of ball-tampering will be proven, so it's moot. |
Was sandpaper used? | |
| |
| SACK THE BOARD on 15:08 - Dec 5 with 2831 views | DaleiLama |
| SACK THE BOARD on 15:00 - Dec 5 by James1980 |
Was sandpaper used? |
You'd have to consult our antipodean "clique-obsessive" to establish that. I've no idea about his peccadillos. By his own admission he's getting on a bit so he may need a little extra stimulation? Conjecture on my part of course. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| SACK THE BOARD on 15:27 - Dec 5 with 2805 views | kel |
| SACK THE BOARD on 14:39 - Dec 5 by rochdaleriddler |
So are all the breaches of these rules going to be sanctioned in any way? |
Sanctioned?
It’s the message board of a third tier football club not a nuclear stand-off. |  | | |
| SACK THE BOARD on 15:42 - Dec 5 with 2770 views | sweetcorn |
| SACK THE BOARD on 15:27 - Dec 5 by kel |
Sanctioned?
It’s the message board of a third tier football club not a nuclear stand-off. |
Won’t be laughing when the UN hit you with a trade ban | |
| Leader of the little gang of immature cretins. |
| |
| SACK THE BOARD on 15:46 - Dec 5 with 2752 views | rochdaleriddler |
| SACK THE BOARD on 15:27 - Dec 5 by kel |
Sanctioned?
It’s the message board of a third tier football club not a nuclear stand-off. |
I just asked the question , kind of logical after admin reminded people to follow the rules, you know as in what happens if people don’t ?. I wasn’t advocating it | |
| |
| SACK THE BOARD on 15:50 - Dec 5 with 2748 views | James1980 |
I say one of the admins should change their username to Boutros Boutros Daley | |
| |
| SACK THE BOARD on 18:22 - Dec 5 with 2617 views | Rochdale_ger |
Doesn’t really rule a lot in that does it. |  | | |
| SACK THE BOARD on 18:56 - Dec 6 with 2339 views | Dorislove |
| SACK THE BOARD on 18:22 - Dec 5 by Rochdale_ger |
Doesn’t really rule a lot in that does it. |
It rules politics and religion in which in my view is a recipe for disaster on a football forum. |  | | |
| SACK THE BOARD on 19:24 - Dec 6 with 2295 views | nordenblue |
| SACK THE BOARD on 18:56 - Dec 6 by Dorislove |
It rules politics and religion in which in my view is a recipe for disaster on a football forum. |
I'd agree with that 100% | | | |
| SACK THE BOARD on 19:44 - Dec 6 with 2260 views | Dorislove |
Getting somewhat back on track with the title of the original post ,how did Chris Dunhpy get removed from his position ,can anybody shed a light on the removal of such a well liked chairman.The share ownership must have alot to do with it so is it just Mr Kilpatrick deciding he needs some new friends bearing in mind he owns 21 % of the shares and only needs a few like minded fellow shareholder to change things or did he just get fed up with Chris Dunphy. | | | |
| SACK THE BOARD on 00:16 - Dec 7 with 2107 views | kiwidale |
| SACK THE BOARD on 19:44 - Dec 6 by Dorislove |
Getting somewhat back on track with the title of the original post ,how did Chris Dunhpy get removed from his position ,can anybody shed a light on the removal of such a well liked chairman.The share ownership must have alot to do with it so is it just Mr Kilpatrick deciding he needs some new friends bearing in mind he owns 21 % of the shares and only needs a few like minded fellow shareholder to change things or did he just get fed up with Chris Dunphy. |
I would love to know the answers to your questions it will be out there and some on here will know but keep it to themselves. Kilpatrick would have been the casting vote with his 21% Dunphy and other long serving board members left shortly after. I also would be interested in Andy Kelly's role in the proceedings. | |
| This is not the time for bickering.
|
| |
| SACK THE BOARD on 12:39 - Dec 10 with 1820 views | Dorislove |
| SACK THE BOARD on 00:16 - Dec 7 by kiwidale |
I would love to know the answers to your questions it will be out there and some on here will know but keep it to themselves. Kilpatrick would have been the casting vote with his 21% Dunphy and other long serving board members left shortly after. I also would be interested in Andy Kelly's role in the proceedings. |
Maybe the next accounts which are due soon can shed some light as to the amount of spending that was done in the final 2 transfer windows under KH.If it was high maybe that has put some pressure on the current finances ? | | | |
| SACK THE BOARD on 12:53 - Dec 10 with 1765 views | boromat |
Pretty sure we've already been told that Keiths last two seasons included 'significantly' higher wage budgets. He also was given money to spend on Jordan Williams.
I get the impression the faith and backing given to Keith didn't materialise with improvements on the pitch. Dunphy was the first to go and then Keith probably wasn't too happy to find out his budget was to be decreased again. Hence we're now being run on a much tighter budget with a younger and most likely cheaper management team along with a much smaller squad.
And to be fair considering those changes we're probably doing better than the last two seasons or at least on par. However we're giving experience to many more of our young players. I don't think all is as bad as is sometimes made out. Can the board do better? yes, can they be more open with us? yes, are they doing a bad job? no. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
