| Match thread: Oxford 14:19 - Jan 21 with 9111 views | 442Dale |
Team:
Logan, Rafferty, McGahey, McNulty, Tanser, Camps, Allen, Cannon, Mendez-Laing, Andrew, Henderson
Subs: Diba, Canavan, Vincenti, McDermott, Noble-Lazarus, Owusu, Morley
No Lund, Rathbone or Lillis. Redshaw not involved yet either. Good to see Tanser back, big chance for him. [Post edited 21 Jan 2017 14:22]
|  |
| |  |
| Match thread: Oxford on 17:37 - Jan 21 with 2760 views | PaulHeymanGuy |
Logan at fault for all 4 goals absolutely awful performance by him. One person in the sandy said but he has made two good saves from 1 on 1s. I'll just excuse the other 4 huge errors then.
Tanser was just awful from start to finish.
Owusu with a less than inspiring debut. Somebody needs to tell him you're allowed to jump off the floor for the ball
Did anybody in pearl Street notice if logan acknowledge the fans before storming off down the tunnel? As he didn't come down to the sandyou unlike most of the squad |  | | |
| Match thread: Oxford on 17:38 - Jan 21 with 2754 views | 442Dale |
| Match thread: Oxford on 17:24 - Jan 21 by Shun |
That was an absolutely embarrassing performance, and I mean worse than dreadful. It really seemed like these players hadn't ever seen each other before, and with the amount of easy passes that went straight to an Oxford player it seemed like they still didn't know what each other looked like during the game. We were missing at least five players who would've played ordinarily, but that's no excuse.
Logan's display was atrocious, I'm struggling to remember a worse display by a Rochdale goalkeeper. His poor ball led to the sending off last week and he contributed to at least two goals today.
I'm consoling myself by seeing today as a freak result, one of those heavy losses that comes against a lesser side when in the middle of a good run. Having said that, we've had quite a few of these freak results this season! [Post edited 21 Jan 2017 17:25]
|
Logan actually made a couple of decent stops, so that raises his display from the all time worst category but there's no way he should be starting next week if Lillis is fit. I certainly don't want to hear the "his distribution is better" argument again, because it really isn't. Yes, when he gets it right he can start an attack very effectively, but it's no where near consistent enough - even in the first half he was putting players in trouble. He's a good keeper to have alongside Lillis as they push each other, happy for him to stay another year in the summer if it's with that in mind, but certainly not worth splashing out on.
We missed Lund a lot and I'd like to know the thinking/reason for Calvin going off. Get a left back in on loan, it was a big ask for Tanser today and I didn't think he was as bad as some but we need some cover there. Keane returning will hopefully settle us down.
Worth noting that if Henderson had stuck away either of his chances at the start of the second half that it could have been a different game, because we were well on top before Logan's mistake for the corner ahead of their third. | |
| |
| Match thread: Oxford on 17:39 - Jan 21 with 2740 views | rkershaw |
| Match thread: Oxford on 17:37 - Jan 21 by PaulHeymanGuy |
Logan at fault for all 4 goals absolutely awful performance by him. One person in the sandy said but he has made two good saves from 1 on 1s. I'll just excuse the other 4 huge errors then.
Tanser was just awful from start to finish.
Owusu with a less than inspiring debut. Somebody needs to tell him you're allowed to jump off the floor for the ball
Did anybody in pearl Street notice if logan acknowledge the fans before storming off down the tunnel? As he didn't come down to the sandyou unlike most of the squad |
Heyyyyy....... lay of the 18 year old debutant please....... hardly the performance for him to make his entrance!! | | | |
| Match thread: Oxford on 17:39 - Jan 21 with 2733 views | dingdangblue |
| Match thread: Oxford on 17:32 - Jan 21 by Jimlidale |
What rumours are they? West Ham won today, I expect their interest could be waning. Newcastle who I believe were also interested won as well. Brentford lost today so they might want to hold on to one of their main strikers, especially if they are looking over their shoulder's. |
I very much doubt that winning a couple of games will stop them signing players. They've just let go of 2 forwards and Payet is leaving too. Carroll needs some support. |  |
| |
| Match thread: Oxford on 17:43 - Jan 21 with 2686 views | PaulHeymanGuy |
| Match thread: Oxford on 17:39 - Jan 21 by rkershaw |
Heyyyyy....... lay of the 18 year old debutant please....... hardly the performance for him to make his entrance!! |
I dobt want to slate a young lad but he could of at least jumped to try and win a header | | | |
| Match thread: Oxford on 17:45 - Jan 21 with 2657 views | JimmyRustler |
| Match thread: Oxford on 17:38 - Jan 21 by 442Dale |
Logan actually made a couple of decent stops, so that raises his display from the all time worst category but there's no way he should be starting next week if Lillis is fit. I certainly don't want to hear the "his distribution is better" argument again, because it really isn't. Yes, when he gets it right he can start an attack very effectively, but it's no where near consistent enough - even in the first half he was putting players in trouble. He's a good keeper to have alongside Lillis as they push each other, happy for him to stay another year in the summer if it's with that in mind, but certainly not worth splashing out on.
We missed Lund a lot and I'd like to know the thinking/reason for Calvin going off. Get a left back in on loan, it was a big ask for Tanser today and I didn't think he was as bad as some but we need some cover there. Keane returning will hopefully settle us down.
Worth noting that if Henderson had stuck away either of his chances at the start of the second half that it could have been a different game, because we were well on top before Logan's mistake for the corner ahead of their third. |
The saves Logan made were academic cause he had already lost us the game. Absolutely bobbins today Conrad. No one can come out of that performance with any credit. Lovely touch giving the MOM to young Josh but I bet the sponsors were secretly glad they didn't have to nominate a player cause they were all shite! Tanser looked like a conference player and is a shadow of the lad who broke onto the scene. Owusu has bags of pace but that looked like his only attribute based on today's showing. I lost count the amount of times we got into a shooting position, only to try and play a tippy tappy Arsenalesque 2 yard through ball. Atrocious. |  | | |
| Match thread: Oxford on 18:07 - Jan 21 with 2498 views | D_Alien |
| Match thread: Oxford on 17:35 - Jan 21 by lyberoc |
Yes it was a dead rat, nice bit of footwork from their number 3 to remove it from the pitch |
Not counting the 2 Dale subs before the second half kicked off - there were 4 other subs plus 2 goals, both of them celebrated at some length. add to that the stoppage of at least 2, probably 3 minutes, and we had just 3 minutes added time??
Yep, it was a blessing in the end, but where the bloody hell do these officials get their timing from? |  |
| |
| Match thread: Oxford on 18:07 - Jan 21 with 2496 views | 442Dale |
Hill, as per Dale twitter: Two injuries yesterday to players who were due to play. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Match thread: Oxford on 18:25 - Jan 21 with 2395 views | TVOS1907 |
| Match thread: Oxford on 18:07 - Jan 21 by D_Alien |
Not counting the 2 Dale subs before the second half kicked off - there were 4 other subs plus 2 goals, both of them celebrated at some length. add to that the stoppage of at least 2, probably 3 minutes, and we had just 3 minutes added time??
Yep, it was a blessing in the end, but where the bloody hell do these officials get their timing from? |
From today I'd say the school of empathy! |  |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
| Match thread: Oxford on 20:07 - Jan 21 with 2116 views | Shun |
Out of interest, when the stoppage occurred for the dead rat, if it had been something else and the game had been abandoned what would have happened? It was 3-0 at the time, not sure of the time. Would the points have been awarded to Oxford or would the game have been replayed? |  | | |
| Match thread: Oxford on 20:13 - Jan 21 with 2091 views | dalefan |
| Match thread: Oxford on 17:27 - Jan 21 by deeplishblue |
Why did you not go? Is it because bunny and Thompson were not playing? |
He didn't go because he's a bury fan | | | |
| Match thread: Oxford on 20:14 - Jan 21 with 2078 views | boromat |
| Match thread: Oxford on 20:07 - Jan 21 by Shun |
Out of interest, when the stoppage occurred for the dead rat, if it had been something else and the game had been abandoned what would have happened? It was 3-0 at the time, not sure of the time. Would the points have been awarded to Oxford or would the game have been replayed? |
It used to be that 75 minutes had to be played for the result to stand otherwise it gets replayed. | |
| |
| Match thread: Oxford on 20:16 - Jan 21 with 2071 views | judd |
| Match thread: Oxford on 20:07 - Jan 21 by Shun |
Out of interest, when the stoppage occurred for the dead rat, if it had been something else and the game had been abandoned what would have happened? It was 3-0 at the time, not sure of the time. Would the points have been awarded to Oxford or would the game have been replayed? |
Sadly that dead rat caused them more problems than our team did all game. Sign it up. |  |
| |
| Match thread: Oxford on 20:45 - Jan 21 with 1958 views | 442Dale |
| Match thread: Oxford on 20:07 - Jan 21 by Shun |
Out of interest, when the stoppage occurred for the dead rat, if it had been something else and the game had been abandoned what would have happened? It was 3-0 at the time, not sure of the time. Would the points have been awarded to Oxford or would the game have been replayed? |
How did it take so long for the rat to be discovered? | |
| |
| Match thread: Oxford on 20:51 - Jan 21 with 1930 views | judd |
| Match thread: Oxford on 20:45 - Jan 21 by 442Dale |
How did it take so long for the rat to be discovered? |
I think the rat was discovered in the 10th century by David Attenborough | |
| |
| Match thread: Oxford on 20:53 - Jan 21 with 1917 views | D_Alien |
| Match thread: Oxford on 20:45 - Jan 21 by 442Dale |
How did it take so long for the rat to be discovered? |
It was assumed to be one of our centre backs? | |
| |
| Match thread: Oxford on 21:06 - Jan 21 with 1855 views | dalenumber2 |
Logan didn't seem to have spotted the rat in the first half ... least of his problems to be honest. |  | | |
| Match thread: Oxford on 22:50 - Jan 21 with 1668 views | since58 |
| Match thread: Oxford on 14:31 - Jan 21 by Toffeemanc |
Pitch at the pearl street end looking pretty cut up and lots of sand in and around the penalty area. Thank you hornets parasite's. |
Was the pitch not relaid in the summer
At some expense?. If the surface has cut up after one game of rugby i think i would be contacting the contractors to find out why.Not blaming Rochdale Hornets. | | | |
| Match thread: Oxford on 23:57 - Jan 21 with 1580 views | Shun |
| Match thread: Oxford on 20:45 - Jan 21 by 442Dale |
How did it take so long for the rat to be discovered? |
I have no idea, but when the game was stopped it seemed like everybody was just deliberating over how to move it. | | | |
| Match thread: Oxford on 01:04 - Jan 22 with 1490 views | TVOS1907 |
| Match thread: Oxford on 23:57 - Jan 21 by Shun |
I have no idea, but when the game was stopped it seemed like everybody was just deliberating over how to move it. |
The ref probably said to the groundsman, "There's a rat on your pitch man, what are you going to do?" | |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
| Match thread: Oxford on 20:23 - Jan 22 with 1087 views | DaleiLama |
Why, when we were at home, did we play in yellow? |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
