| Whoever next interviews GA... 17:16 - Mar 4 with 1789 views | Petros |
A simple question: while respecting your desire to keep your cards close to your chest so as not to help the opposition, there is a significant part of the fan base which considers that a significant part of the squad is choosing not to be available for selection, and that those players are either exaggerating or faking injury. This is causing a highly toxic atmosphere. Are they right? |  | | |  |
| Whoever next interviews GA... on 17:30 - Mar 4 with 1693 views | numptydumpty |
Paal, JCS, Balogun, Laird, Amos, Dozell, Wilock, Chair, Dykes, Roberts all not on pitch today.
To be fair, if you were realistic almost all of the above if all were on form, nearly everyone of those players should be on the pitch.
People blaming Dickie. Blaming Tim. At least they got the guts to get on the pitch.
How many of the above truly injured !!!!
Hard to say !!!
But we have a highly paid squad that simply can't be arsed to do their jobs and crying off sick when like many, am extremely dubious that certain players have simply downed tools.
Will we get another point this season !!! |  |
| |
| Whoever next interviews GA... on 17:50 - Mar 4 with 1550 views | stainrods_elbow |
Ooh, yes, I can easily see Nick London leading with that gambit in tonight's must-see post-match interview. (And if GA were to make any kind of answer, he'd rather clearly not be keeping his cards close to his chest, would he?)
His remark that too many were in the sick bay 'for my liking' was disturbingly ambiguous, implying as it does there's more to these 'injuries' than meets the eye.
Have we got a nucleus of players who are fit/committed/able enough to get us out of trouble? I certainly wouldn't put money on it. [Post edited 4 Mar 2023 17:51]
|  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
