| Equality? Not if it involves SWP 19:31 - Dec 16 with 4465 views | Tonto |
Apologies for yet another SWP thread. But some of the crap typed on here about him has got to start.
In the last home game, SWP missed a one on one. People on this board lambasted him. Mackie misses a much easier one on one yesterday, but he gets his name sung straight after the miss. Fair? Nope.
SWP put in a good shift yesterday. But I've read posts stating he was a "passenger" for most of the game. Utter boollocks of course, but because its SWP hes fair game.
I hate the way that Rangers fans have to have a boo boy. We have wrecked the careers of potentially good players who didn't have the confidence to beat the boo boys. Kevin McLeod stands out - a young winger who could have gone on to better things but was booed out of Loftus Road for "not being Dave Thomas" despite being aged 20.
I dont expect you to stop, and I expect people to come on here and tell me how wrong I am. But then again, its one of the main reasons I post on here less and less...
|  |
| |  |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 19:51 - Dec 16 with 2294 views | SomersetHoops |
I agree he had a good game, just needs a goal to moderate the criticism. |  |
| |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 19:52 - Dec 16 with 2293 views | Suffolk |
In full agreement Tonto.  |  | | |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 19:57 - Dec 16 with 2274 views | Fearless |
2 very different things
Mackie has earnt the respect of the fans and this was demonstrated after the miss
SWP hasnt
IMO |  | | |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 19:59 - Dec 16 with 2269 views | TheBlob |
Don't think Mackie ever said it wasn't his club.Or tried to break defenders legs trying to hoist over crosses. |  |
| |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 20:00 - Dec 16 with 2266 views | chris1969 |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 19:52 - Dec 16 by Suffolk |
In full agreement Tonto. |
I came home and watched the game again on Sky match choice and he had a really good first half with some great tackles and passes.
When your losing games he is an easy target and he does need a couple of goals. |  | | |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 20:09 - Dec 16 with 2232 views | Suffolk |
Can any of the SWP hate mob remind me during which game he did not give 100%? Please don't reply if you are going to come out with the usual shite about misplaced passes, poor crosses, high wages and lack of goals as that can be levelled at most of the squad. He has not hit the heights of his prime but he is not deserving of the moronic assault levelled at him by many on this board. The person best placed to be his judge and jury is HR. [Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
| | | |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 20:13 - Dec 16 with 2217 views | Jamie |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 19:59 - Dec 16 by TheBlob |
Don't think Mackie ever said it wasn't his club.Or tried to break defenders legs trying to hoist over crosses. |
Some high profile recent events should tell you not to take twitter rumours as fact.
When a rumour can be tracked back to a tweet of 'my mate tells me....' it is not the strongest.
Personally have no particular love for the guy but some of the things written recently have been ridiculous. [Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
| | | |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 20:16 - Dec 16 with 2202 views | yankranger |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 19:57 - Dec 16 by Fearless |
2 very different things
Mackie has earnt the respect of the fans and this was demonstrated after the miss
SWP hasnt
IMO |
Agree with this 100%.
Perhaps I am very biased and don't realise it, but I didn't think SWP was good yesterday either. I remember one very good tackle and a bunch of very poorly placed passes or giving the ball away. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 21:30 - Dec 16 with 2105 views | TW_R |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 20:13 - Dec 16 by Jamie |
Some high profile recent events should tell you not to take twitter rumours as fact.
When a rumour can be tracked back to a tweet of 'my mate tells me....' it is not the strongest.
Personally have no particular love for the guy but some of the things written recently have been ridiculous. [Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
|
Good article with SWP in the Telegraph yesterday. Doesn't sound like a man who hates the club. Just someone desperate to do well.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/queens-park-rangers/9745848/QPR- |  | | |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 21:37 - Dec 16 with 2087 views | WestonsuperR |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 20:09 - Dec 16 by Suffolk |
Can any of the SWP hate mob remind me during which game he did not give 100%? Please don't reply if you are going to come out with the usual shite about misplaced passes, poor crosses, high wages and lack of goals as that can be levelled at most of the squad. He has not hit the heights of his prime but he is not deserving of the moronic assault levelled at him by many on this board. The person best placed to be his judge and jury is HR. [Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
|
Why don't you enlighten us with the games SWP has put in 100% because I haven't got time to list all 40+ appearances he has put in for us so far. How many Prem goals has this attacking midfielder scored for us by the way?
As much as a appreciate his upturn in from I think it's disgraceful that it has taken a change of Manager for him to bother to put the effort in.
I won't forgive some one who has openly criticised our own fans and claimed it was our fault the team wasn't performing. |  | | |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 21:46 - Dec 16 with 2066 views | Bushman |
Everyone on here knows more about football than HR.
They just don't want the hassle of being a manager.
E  |  |
| I know almost nothing about the Premier League even though I try to catch the big games every now and then at the end of the season. But I will say this, Queens Park Rangers is just a fukking sick ass team name. Just sounds so cool. |
| |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 21:49 - Dec 16 with 2059 views | TW_R |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 21:37 - Dec 16 by WestonsuperR |
Why don't you enlighten us with the games SWP has put in 100% because I haven't got time to list all 40+ appearances he has put in for us so far. How many Prem goals has this attacking midfielder scored for us by the way?
As much as a appreciate his upturn in from I think it's disgraceful that it has taken a change of Manager for him to bother to put the effort in.
I won't forgive some one who has openly criticised our own fans and claimed it was our fault the team wasn't performing. |
As Jamie mentioned above. Has he openly criticised our fans or is this just a story that came out like many others we hear that turn out to be bullshit? | | | |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 21:52 - Dec 16 with 2047 views | Neil_SI |
The bottom line is that we're a fair crowd and we know our football.
Play properly and give your all and the crowd will respond to you. Shaun Wright-Phillips received a standing ovation when he went off and that says it all about QPR, and he had one of his better games since he's been here.
There's a lot of frustrated fans with him, but they will praise when appropriate and even give a little extra just to acknowledge and give the benefit of the doubt when it's needed, as they did yesterday. |  | | |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 23:32 - Dec 16 with 1951 views | klr |
What an absolutely & utterly ridiculous thread.
I think he gets off scott free at QPR.
At a Leeds or a West Ham he would have been hounded out of the f*cking club by now.
You'll never win one of these arguments / debates, why ?
Because Shaun Wright-Phillips is a f*cking awful football player. | | | |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 23:46 - Dec 16 with 1928 views | Tonto |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 23:32 - Dec 16 by klr |
What an absolutely & utterly ridiculous thread.
I think he gets off scott free at QPR.
At a Leeds or a West Ham he would have been hounded out of the f*cking club by now.
You'll never win one of these arguments / debates, why ?
Because Shaun Wright-Phillips is a f*cking awful football player. |
yeah cos booing your own players will help us win games.
well done for proving my point. | |
| |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 23:49 - Dec 16 with 1918 views | klr |
I was saying exactly the same thing before we even signed him, it was / is hardly the biggest secret in football what a shocking player he is.
| | | |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 23:53 - Dec 16 with 1907 views | Tonto |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 23:49 - Dec 16 by klr |
I was saying exactly the same thing before we even signed him, it was / is hardly the biggest secret in football what a shocking player he is.
|
just because you disagree with something does not make it a pointless thread.
And even if you dont like a player, he will still get my support for as long as he wears hoops.
Others just like to moan and boo. I dont respect so called fans like that | |
| |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 23:57 - Dec 16 with 1895 views | klr |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 23:53 - Dec 16 by Tonto |
just because you disagree with something does not make it a pointless thread.
And even if you dont like a player, he will still get my support for as long as he wears hoops.
Others just like to moan and boo. I dont respect so called fans like that |
Just out of interest, for all you lot coming out with the "he put a shift in" nonsense
If you knew then what you know now about this player would you still have wanted us to sign him ?
EXACTLY. | | | |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 00:01 - Dec 17 with 1882 views | BazWoT |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 23:53 - Dec 16 by Tonto |
just because you disagree with something does not make it a pointless thread.
And even if you dont like a player, he will still get my support for as long as he wears hoops.
Others just like to moan and boo. I dont respect so called fans like that |
I clapped like everyone ese when he came off. Fair play to him.
Hopefully, Harry knows what everyone else on planet earth knows about him.
May take a tad longer as Harry tinkers but we did well carrying that passenger yesterday. |  |
| WE R PREMIER LEAGUE, SAY!!! |
| |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 00:02 - Dec 17 with 1883 views | Tonto |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 23:57 - Dec 16 by klr |
Just out of interest, for all you lot coming out with the "he put a shift in" nonsense
If you knew then what you know now about this player would you still have wanted us to sign him ?
EXACTLY. |
still proving my point: thank you | |
| |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 00:02 - Dec 17 with 1882 views | chris1969 |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 23:57 - Dec 16 by klr |
Just out of interest, for all you lot coming out with the "he put a shift in" nonsense
If you knew then what you know now about this player would you still have wanted us to sign him ?
EXACTLY. |
But we did sign him and Harry is picking him. | | | |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 00:08 - Dec 17 with 1866 views | BazWoT |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 00:02 - Dec 17 by Tonto |
still proving my point: thank you |
Mr Cole, pray tell, his positive contributions yesterday were what? | |
| WE R PREMIER LEAGUE, SAY!!! |
| |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 00:09 - Dec 17 with 1864 views | daveB |
i said straight after the Mackie miss that was the best player to miss that chance, anyone else including Taarabt would have been slaughtered. To be fair to SWP he has played well the last three games, hopefully that willl continue |  | | |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 00:10 - Dec 17 with 1854 views | Tonto |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 00:08 - Dec 17 by BazWoT |
Mr Cole, pray tell, his positive contributions yesterday were what? |
oooh another one proving my point.
Keep it coming chaps! | |
| |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 00:12 - Dec 17 with 1852 views | klr |
| Equality? Not if it involves SWP on 00:08 - Dec 17 by BazWoT |
Mr Cole, pray tell, his positive contributions yesterday were what? |
I'd like to know that as well.
I'd like to know just what this "putting in a shift" entails exactly. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
