Hazza and Meghan step back on 21:25 - Jan 9 with 2294 views | exiledclaseboy | Incidentally, the Daily Telegraph is in absolute meltdown about this. The first dozen articles on its homepage are about it. Trump v Iran has been duly relegated. | |
| |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 21:25 - Jan 9 with 2294 views | londonlisa2001 |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 21:23 - Jan 9 by Flashberryjack | Has Megan been hung out to dry ? |
She has undoubtedly been attacked by the British tabloids. Although, I suspect, nothing compared to the way they’ll be attacked from now on. The knives will be out. | | | |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 21:29 - Jan 9 with 2278 views | exiledclaseboy | Markle started from a seriously disadvantaged position in the eyes of British royalist types. She’s an independent woman with independent wealth and a well established and successful career of her own. She has a mind of her own and isn’t afraid to use it. And she’s mixed race with a colourful (no pun intended) family background. There will have been many a dislodged monocle I’d imagine. [Post edited 9 Jan 2020 21:29]
| |
| |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 21:29 - Jan 9 with 2277 views | Catullus |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 21:21 - Jan 9 by sainthelens | Who's to say Harry's not pssd off at the way the establishment are protecting Andrew while he feels his Mrs is hung out to dry. Not my opinion btw , just putting it out there. |
Andrew...his shenanigans are making a strong case for going Federal. He's too dumb to realise, well anything it seems. I respect the Queen, and Phil the Greek as far as it goes. That is as far as saying when Her Maj passes they can split up the money and make a sharp exit to a paradise of their choice. | |
| |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 22:00 - Jan 9 with 2249 views | Flashberryjack |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 21:25 - Jan 9 by londonlisa2001 | She has undoubtedly been attacked by the British tabloids. Although, I suspect, nothing compared to the way they’ll be attacked from now on. The knives will be out. |
I don't think the press has been particularly harsh on her... but of course that would depend on what you consider to be harsh. | |
| |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 22:54 - Jan 9 with 2214 views | Banosswan |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 22:00 - Jan 9 by Flashberryjack | I don't think the press has been particularly harsh on her... but of course that would depend on what you consider to be harsh. |
To be fair there was definitely a narrative against her. But now they've gone and confirmed all the negative comments. | |
| Ever since my son was... never conceived, because I've never had consensual sex without money involved... I've always kind of looked at you as... a thing, that I could live next to... in accordance with state laws. | Poll: | How do you like your steak? |
| |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 08:20 - Jan 10 with 2140 views | Kilkennyjack |
Truth. | |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 09:29 - Jan 10 with 2118 views | jackportis | JP comments a third rate actress who exploited the royal family and British public. She also let down Harry's family. His walk away from duty must also mean no more England Rugby matches pouncing around. Andrew must be chuffed the focus is off him. Frogmore cottage. This should be used by Sadiq Khan or religious leaders from ethnic backgrounds. | |
| Jackportis the brand. “A gifted posterâ€, “planet swans have a real talent on their hands in the name of Jackportis†sky sports 2018. . JP fully supports posters of LBG, mx orientation and ethnic minority groups. Update - now fully supporting the pansexual community. |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Hazza and Meghan step back on 10:50 - Jan 10 with 2099 views | Ebo | The Daily Mail have systematically hunted Meghan and Harry down like Diana over a number of years. Now they claim H&M to be "traitors" for being hunted and choosing a different path for themselves. I imagine that The Mail expected H&M to do the decent thing and go on a road trip in Paris ... It's the same set of behaviours that the Mail / Express / Sun apply to Remainers, Judges etc. They have invested 17 pages of hate in their pursuit of Meghan and Harry today because they chose a different pathway for their exit instead of a tunnel of love ... Who buys this stuff? Just STOP sponsoring hate? Sorry seems to be the hardest word for Mail readers. It seems to me that they live their lives like candles in the wind ... Meanwhile, WW III, climate crisis, Brexit disaster, dumping young people's futures get no coverage due to the gaslighting of our gutter press ... "it's a good day to bury bad news with a royal jizzfest" To top it all, one of Vote Leave's senior wonks has just tweeted that "Princess Diana did not complain as much about her job" ... well it's kind of hard for her to do that now isn't it? Is it too much to expect her son not to want to repeat that movie scene? | |
| |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 10:57 - Jan 10 with 2091 views | Highjack |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 10:50 - Jan 10 by Ebo | The Daily Mail have systematically hunted Meghan and Harry down like Diana over a number of years. Now they claim H&M to be "traitors" for being hunted and choosing a different path for themselves. I imagine that The Mail expected H&M to do the decent thing and go on a road trip in Paris ... It's the same set of behaviours that the Mail / Express / Sun apply to Remainers, Judges etc. They have invested 17 pages of hate in their pursuit of Meghan and Harry today because they chose a different pathway for their exit instead of a tunnel of love ... Who buys this stuff? Just STOP sponsoring hate? Sorry seems to be the hardest word for Mail readers. It seems to me that they live their lives like candles in the wind ... Meanwhile, WW III, climate crisis, Brexit disaster, dumping young people's futures get no coverage due to the gaslighting of our gutter press ... "it's a good day to bury bad news with a royal jizzfest" To top it all, one of Vote Leave's senior wonks has just tweeted that "Princess Diana did not complain as much about her job" ... well it's kind of hard for her to do that now isn't it? Is it too much to expect her son not to want to repeat that movie scene? |
How do you know what is in the Mail unless you read it? | |
| |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 12:37 - Jan 10 with 2056 views | Flashberryjack |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 10:57 - Jan 10 by Highjack | How do you know what is in the Mail unless you read it? |
Someone who reads it told a friend of a friend who then told Ebo. | |
| |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 12:48 - Jan 10 with 2043 views | wobbly |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 10:50 - Jan 10 by Ebo | The Daily Mail have systematically hunted Meghan and Harry down like Diana over a number of years. Now they claim H&M to be "traitors" for being hunted and choosing a different path for themselves. I imagine that The Mail expected H&M to do the decent thing and go on a road trip in Paris ... It's the same set of behaviours that the Mail / Express / Sun apply to Remainers, Judges etc. They have invested 17 pages of hate in their pursuit of Meghan and Harry today because they chose a different pathway for their exit instead of a tunnel of love ... Who buys this stuff? Just STOP sponsoring hate? Sorry seems to be the hardest word for Mail readers. It seems to me that they live their lives like candles in the wind ... Meanwhile, WW III, climate crisis, Brexit disaster, dumping young people's futures get no coverage due to the gaslighting of our gutter press ... "it's a good day to bury bad news with a royal jizzfest" To top it all, one of Vote Leave's senior wonks has just tweeted that "Princess Diana did not complain as much about her job" ... well it's kind of hard for her to do that now isn't it? Is it too much to expect her son not to want to repeat that movie scene? |
They need 17 pages to squeeze in enough photos of Megan (with a couple of the ginger kid as well). Which, to be clear, I’m absolutely fine with. 18 pages would be better though. | | | |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 18:21 - Jan 10 with 1969 views | jackportis | Has anybody come up with a theory that Harry has just discovered he is actually not Charles son? | |
| Jackportis the brand. “A gifted posterâ€, “planet swans have a real talent on their hands in the name of Jackportis†sky sports 2018. . JP fully supports posters of LBG, mx orientation and ethnic minority groups. Update - now fully supporting the pansexual community. |
| |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 18:40 - Jan 10 with 1952 views | Swanjaxs |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 18:21 - Jan 10 by jackportis | Has anybody come up with a theory that Harry has just discovered he is actually not Charles son? |
James Hewitt was unavailable for comment... | |
| |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 18:44 - Jan 10 with 1946 views | Highjack | If it’s taken him over 35 years to figure that one out he’s even thicker than we thought. | |
| |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 20:06 - Jan 10 with 1917 views | theloneranger | | |
| Everyday above ground ... Is a good day! 😎 |
| |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 09:54 - Jan 11 with 1851 views | waynekerr55 | Is anyone else perplexed by the outrage? I mean, Prince Andrew hung around with a nonce and that's blown over. | |
| |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 12:48 - Jan 11 with 1808 views | DJack |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 09:54 - Jan 11 by waynekerr55 | Is anyone else perplexed by the outrage? I mean, Prince Andrew hung around with a nonce and that's blown over. |
They're very well connected, entitled people with liberal values... of course the presss hate them. | |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 13:36 - Jan 11 with 1783 views | Joe_bradshaw | The great British tabloid press has spent the last couple of years saying clear off Meghan, you're not a proper royal and it's outrageous the way you've infiltrated the royal family. Now she's said she's clearing off they're saying it's outrageous the way she's clearing off. | |
| |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 13:38 - Jan 11 with 1780 views | Flashberryjack |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 13:36 - Jan 11 by Joe_bradshaw | The great British tabloid press has spent the last couple of years saying clear off Meghan, you're not a proper royal and it's outrageous the way you've infiltrated the royal family. Now she's said she's clearing off they're saying it's outrageous the way she's clearing off. |
Nonsense | |
| |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 11:01 - Jan 13 with 1656 views | Ebo | Get rid of the lot of them they should. Bastard lazy scroungers. F uck them. | |
| |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 13:18 - Jan 13 with 1605 views | Highjack |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 11:01 - Jan 13 by Ebo | Get rid of the lot of them they should. Bastard lazy scroungers. F uck them. |
Full of hate you are master Yoda. | |
| |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 13:22 - Jan 13 with 1592 views | sainthelens | They are gonna set up a creche in Canada and Andrew is gonna be manager....kinda hands on role. | | | |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 13:23 - Jan 13 with 1590 views | Ebo | Breaking: Queen has invited Meghan for a straightener in the car park of buck house. | |
| |
Hazza and Meghan step back on 19:13 - Jan 13 with 1517 views | majorraglan | I am not a royal by any stretch of the imagination, but I do believe the press have given Meghan a lot more of a hard time that Kate. If Harry and his Mars want to withdraw, then let them crack on. What really annoys me about the situation is all these Royal Correspondents who none of us have ever heard of being wheeled out to give their expert opinion on the TV, radio and newspapers and getting paid a fortune. | | | |
| |