Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Barton appeal rejected 15:29 - Jan 4 with 4799 viewsNorthernr

3 game ban - MK, Newcastle, Wigan.

There are no words.
0
Barton appeal rejected on 15:31 - Jan 4 with 2762 viewsTonto

this was the FA we were talking about - is anyone surprised?

Why stop now, just when I'm hating it
Poll: How was the transfer window for you?

0
Barton appeal rejected on 15:34 - Jan 4 with 2715 viewsTheBlob

What happens if we draw up at MK?Only one league game then.

Poll: So how was the season for you?

0
Barton appeal rejected on 15:34 - Jan 4 with 2708 viewsTonto

Barton appeal rejected on 15:34 - Jan 4 by TheBlob

What happens if we draw up at MK?Only one league game then.


thats tempting!

Why stop now, just when I'm hating it
Poll: How was the transfer window for you?

0
Barton appeal rejected on 15:34 - Jan 4 with 2709 viewsAlbRanger

Barton appeal rejected on 15:31 - Jan 4 by Tonto

this was the FA we were talking about - is anyone surprised?


http://www.thefa.com/TheFA/Disciplinary/NewsAndFeatures/2012/joey-barton-qpr-cla

They've even changed the official reason for the sending off!!
[Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
0
Barton appeal rejected on 15:35 - Jan 4 with 2696 viewstinhead

not surprised in the slightest. They were going to try and stick the boot in because it's him.

we really need a less (allegedly) corrupt footballing body for any kind of justice or common sense to prevail.

Puny God!

0
Barton appeal rejected on 15:35 - Jan 4 with 2695 viewsMetallica_Hoop

Bunch of Brian Kant's

Beer and Beef has made us what we are - The Prince Regent

0
Barton appeal rejected on 15:38 - Jan 4 with 2652 viewsJamie

Said it wouldn't be overturned, lucky it didn't become 4 games.
0
Barton appeal rejected on 15:39 - Jan 4 with 2640 viewsdaveB

that is incredible
0
Login to get fewer ads

Barton appeal rejected on 15:40 - Jan 4 with 2614 viewsdaveB

how can it be violent conduct, they really are clueless.
0
Barton appeal rejected on 15:41 - Jan 4 with 2595 views18StoneOfHoop

I've got a few words..

SPIT! BUNK! TWOT! POLLOCK! ARSE! BANK! PRIX! C0CK-SUcKAS! MOTHERFOOKAS! A THOUSAND BLISTERING BARNACLES! AY CARAMBA! SHYSTENHAUSEN! 57 SENILE FA OLD FARTS,B'STAAD!,B'STAAD!,KHANT!,KHANT!



FA Appeals Committee = Not Fit For Purpose

'I'm 18 with a bullet.Got my finger on the trigger,I'm gonna pull it.." Love,Peace and Fook Chelski! More like 20StoneOfHoop now. Let's face it I'm not getting any thinner. Pass the cake and pies please.

0
Barton appeal rejected on 15:43 - Jan 4 with 2555 viewsadhoc_qpr

Violent conduct based on the shoulder bump?? Or are the FA just pretending there really was a headbutt so they don't have to deal with the repercussions on the standard of refereeing and players cheating.

Either way the fact they didn't add a game for frivilous appeal clearly shows to me that they know the decision was wrong, but don't care.
0
Barton appeal rejected on 15:44 - Jan 4 with 2544 viewsTheBlob

Barton appeal rejected on 15:41 - Jan 4 by 18StoneOfHoop

I've got a few words..

SPIT! BUNK! TWOT! POLLOCK! ARSE! BANK! PRIX! C0CK-SUcKAS! MOTHERFOOKAS! A THOUSAND BLISTERING BARNACLES! AY CARAMBA! SHYSTENHAUSEN! 57 SENILE FA OLD FARTS,B'STAAD!,B'STAAD!,KHANT!,KHANT!



FA Appeals Committee = Not Fit For Purpose



Poll: So how was the season for you?

0
Barton appeal rejected on 15:44 - Jan 4 with 2540 viewsPinnerPaul

Barton appeal rejected on 15:40 - Jan 4 by daveB

how can it be violent conduct, they really are clueless.


Because there are only 7 sending off offences.

Only two apply - Serious Foul Play (Ball has to be within playing distance) so its the other one - Violent Conduct.

If anyone is interested the others are

Offensive, Insulting abusive language
Denying an Obvious Goalscoring opportunity (by foul, moving towards goal)
As above by handball but replace opportunity with goal and delete the moving bit!
2 cautions
Spitting
0
Barton appeal rejected on 15:50 - Jan 4 with 2460 viewsBazWoT

Barton appeal rejected on 15:44 - Jan 4 by PinnerPaul

Because there are only 7 sending off offences.

Only two apply - Serious Foul Play (Ball has to be within playing distance) so its the other one - Violent Conduct.

If anyone is interested the others are

Offensive, Insulting abusive language
Denying an Obvious Goalscoring opportunity (by foul, moving towards goal)
As above by handball but replace opportunity with goal and delete the moving bit!
2 cautions
Spitting


But the officials said he was sent off for intent.

Where does this intent come in then?

Never understood that, it implies the officials can read a player's mind.


WE R PREMIER LEAGUE, SAY!!!

0
Barton appeal rejected on 15:51 - Jan 4 with 2453 viewsJamie

The FA have now set a precedent for what constitutes 'violent conduct'

Games are going to finish 7 v 8 every week!
0
Barton appeal rejected on 15:59 - Jan 4 with 2384 viewsWatfordR

Well I know this.

On the basis of the video evidence available, the ref and the lino would be hard pressed to prove in a court of law that they spotted any violent conduct before the ref whistled for a free kick to us. And if the ref or lino didnt spot the offence, the sending off contravenes FA rules and is therefore not enforceable.
0
Barton appeal rejected on 16:01 - Jan 4 with 2369 viewsDevonWhite

Barton appeal rejected on 15:59 - Jan 4 by WatfordR

Well I know this.

On the basis of the video evidence available, the ref and the lino would be hard pressed to prove in a court of law that they spotted any violent conduct before the ref whistled for a free kick to us. And if the ref or lino didnt spot the offence, the sending off contravenes FA rules and is therefore not enforceable.


This is my biggest grievance with it as well. The fourth official is not allowed to influence decisions on the pitch. We've already had FIFA covering up this happening with Zidane at the World Cup. Scandalous all round.
0
Barton appeal rejected on 16:01 - Jan 4 with 2369 viewsN12Hoop

Barton appeal rejected on 15:51 - Jan 4 by Jamie

The FA have now set a precedent for what constitutes 'violent conduct'

Games are going to finish 7 v 8 every week!


And Johnson's behaviour both on the pitch and at the darts goes unpunished? Given how the a-holes running the FA love throwing disrepute charges about, surely his behaviour warrants some form of charge! W*nkers!

Poll: Who would you most like to see win the Premiership?

0
Barton appeal rejected on 16:03 - Jan 4 with 2354 viewsAntti_Heinola

Barton appeal rejected on 15:38 - Jan 4 by Jamie

Said it wouldn't be overturned, lucky it didn't become 4 games.


You were right Jamie! Well done! If I was your mum I'd offer you an extra slice of cake with your tea you clever lad.

Bare bones.

0
Barton appeal rejected on 16:05 - Jan 4 with 2322 viewsQPR1882

CHEAT IS A VERY STRONG WORD,BUT.....................
0
Barton appeal rejected on 16:05 - Jan 4 with 2321 viewshamptonhillhoop

Words utterly fail me. A non existent headbutt that everyone knows the officials didn't even see. Upheld. Frank Lampard with a potentially leg breaking tackle, can't do anything as the ref 'dealt' with it at the time. Rooney gets three game ban for actually kicking someone and they appeal it to uefa. Can't wait to see them deal with terry
0
Barton appeal rejected on 16:06 - Jan 4 with 2314 viewsPinnerPaul

Barton appeal rejected on 15:50 - Jan 4 by BazWoT

But the officials said he was sent off for intent.

Where does this intent come in then?

Never understood that, it implies the officials can read a player's mind.



It doesn't Baz.

Actual words are "Strikes or attempts to strike an opponent"

In this case they are implying that he attempted to heda butt him.

Intent doesn't come into it, as you say how can anyone judge intent?
0
Barton appeal rejected on 16:06 - Jan 4 with 2311 viewscanary

Barton appeal rejected on 16:03 - Jan 4 by Antti_Heinola

You were right Jamie! Well done! If I was your mum I'd offer you an extra slice of cake with your tea you clever lad.


I'm shocked if I'm honest.

I still cant see why JB has been sent off?
Johnson puts his head into Barton just as much as JB puts his head in!

0
Barton appeal rejected on 16:07 - Jan 4 with 2305 viewsQPR_Jim

What the fcuk is the point of this sport if things like this are allowed to go on. The FA are doing a real good job of undermining football in England and setting a poor example to future generations at the same time.
0
Barton appeal rejected on 16:09 - Jan 4 with 2281 viewshamptonhillhoop

Barton appeal rejected on 16:06 - Jan 4 by canary

I'm shocked if I'm honest.

I still cant see why JB has been sent off?
Johnson puts his head into Barton just as much as JB puts his head in!



I'm not shocked, I'm just very angry. I appreciate youve been alright about this but your manager and some of your players should be embarrassed
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024