New finances logged by the Swans : But what are the implications ? on 17:44 - Dec 23 with 907 views | Whiterockin | Thanks for a clear explanation of the current finances. It looks as if the new owners have kept their word and invested the £20M. It should give us a little breathing space in January to rejig the squad which is desperately needed. | | | |
New finances logged by the Swans : But what are the implications ? on 17:49 - Dec 23 with 878 views | QJumpingJack | Good luck to Coleman and the new investors. Hopefully things will improve quickly. It feels the club has been decaying over the last 8-9 years. The lack of engagement with the fans, and the lack of investment (at key times when we were pushing for promotion) has set the club back big time. It is a steep learning curve for the new owners..... and this is why they and Luke need support with someone who has experience of this league. | | | |
New finances logged by the Swans : But what are the implications ? on 14:49 - Dec 24 with 479 views | KeithHaynes |
New finances logged by the Swans : But what are the implications ? on 17:44 - Dec 23 by Whiterockin | Thanks for a clear explanation of the current finances. It looks as if the new owners have kept their word and invested the £20M. It should give us a little breathing space in January to rejig the squad which is desperately needed. |
Had to reach to the upper echelons of football hierarchy. 👍 | |
| |
New finances logged by the Swans : But what are the implications ? on 15:03 - Dec 24 with 450 views | ReslovenSwan1 | The numbers sort of make sense 42,058,434 new shares at a price of 50p a share of a is £21,029,217. There are 164,874,306 shares in the club at 50p valuing the club at £82m. This is clearly overvalued meaning the dilution has been generous to minor shareholders. The 5% protection for the fans holding confirms they will never be of importance and reflects the "wimpy" nature of this organisation. They had it all but chose to look for protection not big money and clout. [Post edited 24 Dec 15:05]
| |
| |
New finances logged by the Swans : But what are the implications ? on 15:12 - Dec 24 with 415 views | Whiterockin |
New finances logged by the Swans : But what are the implications ? on 15:03 - Dec 24 by ReslovenSwan1 | The numbers sort of make sense 42,058,434 new shares at a price of 50p a share of a is £21,029,217. There are 164,874,306 shares in the club at 50p valuing the club at £82m. This is clearly overvalued meaning the dilution has been generous to minor shareholders. The 5% protection for the fans holding confirms they will never be of importance and reflects the "wimpy" nature of this organisation. They had it all but chose to look for protection not big money and clout. [Post edited 24 Dec 15:05]
|
It's the total share value not the value of the club. Shares are only worth what someone will pay for them. In reality just a paper valuation. | | | |
New finances logged by the Swans : But what are the implications ? on 15:12 - Dec 24 with 413 views | KeithHaynes |
New finances logged by the Swans : But what are the implications ? on 15:03 - Dec 24 by ReslovenSwan1 | The numbers sort of make sense 42,058,434 new shares at a price of 50p a share of a is £21,029,217. There are 164,874,306 shares in the club at 50p valuing the club at £82m. This is clearly overvalued meaning the dilution has been generous to minor shareholders. The 5% protection for the fans holding confirms they will never be of importance and reflects the "wimpy" nature of this organisation. They had it all but chose to look for protection not big money and clout. [Post edited 24 Dec 15:05]
|
I see the supporters trust essential to those who contribute to its membership as we do, and some of the work which is more credible than in recent times. | |
| |
New finances logged by the Swans : But what are the implications ? on 15:44 - Dec 24 with 358 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
New finances logged by the Swans : But what are the implications ? on 15:12 - Dec 24 by Whiterockin | It's the total share value not the value of the club. Shares are only worth what someone will pay for them. In reality just a paper valuation. |
Yes I agree but the valuation of a notional 50p is used presumably to determine % percentage holding of the club. What % holding arises from the £20m invested. This depends on the notional share price. The higher the club share price the lower number of share to be purchased and the less the minor shareholders are diluted in terms of percentage holding. The Trust will not tell you this. I do (if I have interpreted the figures correctly) The fans hate 'the Yank's but do not appreciate their kind actions. It is the same with Leigh Dineen and his support for the Women's team. How much did Coleman and co buy the club for? Not a lot I suspect. | |
| |
New finances logged by the Swans : But what are the implications ? on 15:46 - Dec 24 with 354 views | QJumpingJack |
New finances logged by the Swans : But what are the implications ? on 15:44 - Dec 24 by ReslovenSwan1 | Yes I agree but the valuation of a notional 50p is used presumably to determine % percentage holding of the club. What % holding arises from the £20m invested. This depends on the notional share price. The higher the club share price the lower number of share to be purchased and the less the minor shareholders are diluted in terms of percentage holding. The Trust will not tell you this. I do (if I have interpreted the figures correctly) The fans hate 'the Yank's but do not appreciate their kind actions. It is the same with Leigh Dineen and his support for the Women's team. How much did Coleman and co buy the club for? Not a lot I suspect. |
why do you continue to use the Y word? Maybe use asterixes if you are quoting it from another poster? | | | | Login to get fewer ads
New finances logged by the Swans : But what are the implications ? on 15:51 - Dec 24 with 330 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
New finances logged by the Swans : But what are the implications ? on 15:46 - Dec 24 by QJumpingJack | why do you continue to use the Y word? Maybe use asterixes if you are quoting it from another poster? |
Yes I hope is now Andy and the team. | |
| |
New finances logged by the Swans : But what are the implications ? on 15:52 - Dec 24 with 327 views | QJumpingJack | "hate" is the wrong term. I think a lot of fans (+ the new ownership group) were fed up of the lack of engagement & investment after so much was promised in the Summer of 2016. It would be so refreshing if new thoughts and analysis were posted instead of the same repetitive posts some of which are very untrue (WoL is not the only source in the world). | | | |
New finances logged by the Swans : But what are the implications ? on 17:21 - Dec 24 with 234 views | SullutaCreturned |
New finances logged by the Swans : But what are the implications ? on 15:44 - Dec 24 by ReslovenSwan1 | Yes I agree but the valuation of a notional 50p is used presumably to determine % percentage holding of the club. What % holding arises from the £20m invested. This depends on the notional share price. The higher the club share price the lower number of share to be purchased and the less the minor shareholders are diluted in terms of percentage holding. The Trust will not tell you this. I do (if I have interpreted the figures correctly) The fans hate 'the Yank's but do not appreciate their kind actions. It is the same with Leigh Dineen and his support for the Women's team. How much did Coleman and co buy the club for? Not a lot I suspect. |
As far as I can see there is only one person who still iuses "yank" or "yanks" and that is you. Pretty much everybody else has moved on and is giving the new regime its fair chance. The trust again, you always attack the trust even when there is no apparent justification. On a previous thread you reckoned they'd paid a pittnace for it, I can't remember the number you guessed at though, possibly 3 million? It's all guesses though. You do love to tell us stuff but at least this time you have put a disclaimer in, just in case it is complete bs. | | | |
New finances logged by the Swans : But what are the implications ? on 21:16 - Dec 24 with 128 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
New finances logged by the Swans : But what are the implications ? on 17:21 - Dec 24 by SullutaCreturned | As far as I can see there is only one person who still iuses "yank" or "yanks" and that is you. Pretty much everybody else has moved on and is giving the new regime its fair chance. The trust again, you always attack the trust even when there is no apparent justification. On a previous thread you reckoned they'd paid a pittnace for it, I can't remember the number you guessed at though, possibly 3 million? It's all guesses though. You do love to tell us stuff but at least this time you have put a disclaimer in, just in case it is complete bs. |
The Trust represent feature of South Wales mentality that is holding us back. Passive, timid and low risk. | |
| |
| |