Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Austin's contract Stand-off 07:45 - Jan 15 with 5172 viewsthame_hoops

I don't blame him, could be BS, apologies if this is a spackan but i couldnt find it on the forum. Oh, and its the daily mail...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2910450/Charlie-Austin-60-000-

0
Austin's contract Stand-off on 08:00 - Jan 15 with 3678 viewswestberksr

Can't blame him, why sign now when he can weigh up his options in the summer, does he really want to play the extra games in the chumpionship next year!
0
Austin's contract Stand-off on 08:09 - Jan 15 with 3653 viewsbosh67

I think he's spot on and honourable.

He could just take double the money and still go if we go down. But he wants to keep us up on his current wage packet and see if that works.

If not, why shouldn't he stay with Prem club?

It won't be Charlie's fault if we go down. Without him we would all but be relegated already.

Never knowingly right.
Poll: How long before new signings become quivering wrecks of the players they were?

3
Austin's contract Stand-off on 08:13 - Jan 15 with 3632 viewsJonDoeman

I wouldn't take that article as gospel. Surely the Scouse Pirlo ain't on 90k a week!!

It Is What It Is !!

1
Austin's contract Stand-off on 08:15 - Jan 15 with 3618 viewshoopdog

Austin's contract Stand-off on 08:09 - Jan 15 by bosh67

I think he's spot on and honourable.

He could just take double the money and still go if we go down. But he wants to keep us up on his current wage packet and see if that works.

If not, why shouldn't he stay with Prem club?

It won't be Charlie's fault if we go down. Without him we would all but be relegated already.


When does his contract expire ? Is he trying to run his contract down and walk on a free
0
Austin's contract Stand-off on 08:26 - Jan 15 with 3586 viewshoopstar67

Austin's contract Stand-off on 08:15 - Jan 15 by hoopdog

When does his contract expire ? Is he trying to run his contract down and walk on a free


May I suggest you read the article.
3
Austin's contract Stand-off on 08:49 - Jan 15 with 3535 viewsBrianMcCarthy

Austin's contract Stand-off on 08:15 - Jan 15 by hoopdog

When does his contract expire ? Is he trying to run his contract down and walk on a free


18 months left to run.

"The opposite of love, after all, is not hate, but indifference."
Poll: Player of the Year (so far)

0
Austin's contract Stand-off on 09:22 - Jan 15 with 3447 viewsbosh67

Austin's contract Stand-off on 08:49 - Jan 15 by BrianMcCarthy

18 months left to run.


He's not standing off because of anything to do with the money, just his career path. He'll bang in the goals until the end of the season and if we stay up I think he will stay, if not he will seek to move on to the Prem again and we'll get a lot of money for him.

Never knowingly right.
Poll: How long before new signings become quivering wrecks of the players they were?

0
Austin's contract Stand-off on 09:27 - Jan 15 with 3426 viewswombat

Austin's contract Stand-off on 09:22 - Jan 15 by bosh67

He's not standing off because of anything to do with the money, just his career path. He'll bang in the goals until the end of the season and if we stay up I think he will stay, if not he will seek to move on to the Prem again and we'll get a lot of money for him.


Or prob take shed loads less money and a couple of triffic lads with dodgy knees looking for a last pay day in replacement

Poll: which is your favouite foot

0
Login to get fewer ads

Austin's contract Stand-off on 09:28 - Jan 15 with 3419 viewsPinnerPaul

No great story.

Same reason why Danny Ings won't sign a new contract with Burnley.

Funny how there are no "Danny Ings in contract stand off" headlines/stories?!
0
Austin's contract Stand-off on 09:31 - Jan 15 with 3405 viewsdaveB

If I was him I'd sign the contract, double your money for a few months and if relegated we'll sell him anyway, win win for him
2
Austin's contract Stand-off on 11:55 - Jan 15 with 3250 viewsrobith

Austin's contract Stand-off on 08:13 - Jan 15 by JonDoeman

I wouldn't take that article as gospel. Surely the Scouse Pirlo ain't on 90k a week!!


Barton's wage is like Pinnochio's nose - it grows with every lie
0
Austin's contract Stand-off on 11:59 - Jan 15 with 3231 viewsGloucs_R

Austin's contract Stand-off on 09:31 - Jan 15 by daveB

If I was him I'd sign the contract, double your money for a few months and if relegated we'll sell him anyway, win win for him


I bet we will only negotiate with a clause that says "minimum release fee"....why would he want this when he can get more from a lower transfer into his back pocket?

Not doing anything wrong IMO by the way.

Poll: Are we staying up?

0
Austin's contract Stand-off on 12:06 - Jan 15 with 3211 viewsJamie

Austin's contract Stand-off on 09:31 - Jan 15 by daveB

If I was him I'd sign the contract, double your money for a few months and if relegated we'll sell him anyway, win win for him


That means we can demand more money for him though and potentially shoe away potential suitors.

He unsurprisingly wants the transfer fee to be a slow as possible to ensure plenty of buyers. Doesn't want to risk ending up at someone like Hull.
0
Austin's contract Stand-off on 13:02 - Jan 15 with 3096 viewswestberksr

Austin's contract Stand-off on 09:28 - Jan 15 by PinnerPaul

No great story.

Same reason why Danny Ings won't sign a new contract with Burnley.

Funny how there are no "Danny Ings in contract stand off" headlines/stories?!


Ings is actually out of contract in the summer. so Burnley have a decision to cash in and go down or keep him and hope to stay up and then he goes for free in the summer.

but unlike us they will do it in a calm and orderly fashion without turning into a media fukkfest.
0
Austin's contract Stand-off on 13:12 - Jan 15 with 3063 viewsCroydonCaptJack

Austin's contract Stand-off on 13:02 - Jan 15 by westberksr

Ings is actually out of contract in the summer. so Burnley have a decision to cash in and go down or keep him and hope to stay up and then he goes for free in the summer.

but unlike us they will do it in a calm and orderly fashion without turning into a media fukkfest.


There has been plenty in the news about Ings's contract being up in the summer but it just isn't as newsworthy. Hardly our fault if the journos pick the easy target is it?
0
Austin's contract Stand-off on 13:39 - Jan 15 with 2985 viewsWestminsteRs

Austin's contract Stand-off on 13:12 - Jan 15 by CroydonCaptJack

There has been plenty in the news about Ings's contract being up in the summer but it just isn't as newsworthy. Hardly our fault if the journos pick the easy target is it?


Also as he's under 23 he couldn't actually go for free I don't think. Would be a tribunal.
0
Austin's contract Stand-off on 13:46 - Jan 15 with 2964 viewswhittocksRs

This is story is almost certainly a mix of guesswork, agents' rubbish and fantasy. Barton is on nothing like £90,000 a week. The papers have been relatively consistent insisting he's on £65,000-£70,000 a week, regardless of whether that's true or not. It's like the Cesar thing — they couldn't help themselves but claim he was on between £80,000-£100,000 when the truth was nothing like that.
0
Austin's contract Stand-off on 14:00 - Jan 15 with 2927 viewsHunterhoop

Austin's contract Stand-off on 13:46 - Jan 15 by whittocksRs

This is story is almost certainly a mix of guesswork, agents' rubbish and fantasy. Barton is on nothing like £90,000 a week. The papers have been relatively consistent insisting he's on £65,000-£70,000 a week, regardless of whether that's true or not. It's like the Cesar thing — they couldn't help themselves but claim he was on between £80,000-£100,000 when the truth was nothing like that.


Didn't Barton Balls boast to one Karl Henry years back at Wolves that he was on £80k per week?

And I'm pretty sure Cesar's package was leaked (can't remember how/why) and he was on £80k basic plus significant bonuses.... I can't remember how I know this, and I'm not one to make up this ITK sh*t, but I'm sure I did know this.

Anyway, basic salary isn't the real story, it's the ave. weekly take home that matters, and the bonuses they're on are significant! Not that many will be picking up too many bonuses at present.
0
Austin's contract Stand-off on 14:14 - Jan 15 with 2886 viewsCroydonCaptJack

Austin's contract Stand-off on 14:00 - Jan 15 by Hunterhoop

Didn't Barton Balls boast to one Karl Henry years back at Wolves that he was on £80k per week?

And I'm pretty sure Cesar's package was leaked (can't remember how/why) and he was on £80k basic plus significant bonuses.... I can't remember how I know this, and I'm not one to make up this ITK sh*t, but I'm sure I did know this.

Anyway, basic salary isn't the real story, it's the ave. weekly take home that matters, and the bonuses they're on are significant! Not that many will be picking up too many bonuses at present.


That is all pretty vague mate!
You know what the press are like, they just recycle lies.
0
Austin's contract Stand-off on 14:25 - Jan 15 with 2871 viewsJamie

Austin's contract Stand-off on 14:00 - Jan 15 by Hunterhoop

Didn't Barton Balls boast to one Karl Henry years back at Wolves that he was on £80k per week?

And I'm pretty sure Cesar's package was leaked (can't remember how/why) and he was on £80k basic plus significant bonuses.... I can't remember how I know this, and I'm not one to make up this ITK sh*t, but I'm sure I did know this.

Anyway, basic salary isn't the real story, it's the ave. weekly take home that matters, and the bonuses they're on are significant! Not that many will be picking up too many bonuses at present.


Cesar was stated at €70k basic in GdS when he first joined us.
0
Austin's contract Stand-off on 14:49 - Jan 15 with 2839 viewsQPunkR

Austin's contract Stand-off on 14:00 - Jan 15 by Hunterhoop

Didn't Barton Balls boast to one Karl Henry years back at Wolves that he was on £80k per week?

And I'm pretty sure Cesar's package was leaked (can't remember how/why) and he was on £80k basic plus significant bonuses.... I can't remember how I know this, and I'm not one to make up this ITK sh*t, but I'm sure I did know this.

Anyway, basic salary isn't the real story, it's the ave. weekly take home that matters, and the bonuses they're on are significant! Not that many will be picking up too many bonuses at present.


Think Barton's on bonuses for hitting the 1st man at corners and passing to the opposition

Shit but local

0
Austin's contract Stand-off on 15:40 - Jan 15 with 2785 viewswhittocksRs

Austin's contract Stand-off on 14:00 - Jan 15 by Hunterhoop

Didn't Barton Balls boast to one Karl Henry years back at Wolves that he was on £80k per week?

And I'm pretty sure Cesar's package was leaked (can't remember how/why) and he was on £80k basic plus significant bonuses.... I can't remember how I know this, and I'm not one to make up this ITK sh*t, but I'm sure I did know this.

Anyway, basic salary isn't the real story, it's the ave. weekly take home that matters, and the bonuses they're on are significant! Not that many will be picking up too many bonuses at present.


The only answer we've ever had on wages was when Fernandes said he'd never paid a player more than £65,000 a week and that was with Samba in the squad. The rest is speculation.
0
Austin's contract Stand-off on 17:03 - Jan 15 with 2695 viewsPinnerPaul

Austin's contract Stand-off on 13:02 - Jan 15 by westberksr

Ings is actually out of contract in the summer. so Burnley have a decision to cash in and go down or keep him and hope to stay up and then he goes for free in the summer.

but unlike us they will do it in a calm and orderly fashion without turning into a media fukkfest.


Not sure how the club is to blame for the media writing this story.

Charlie, like Ings, wants the best deal for him and family.

Wouldn't matter if we gave him a 10 year £100K a week contract tomorrow, he isn't staying if we go down.

For all that Burnley have become a great club on here and Sean Dych the new messiah, Ings will be off like a shot if THEY go down and/or a big club come in for him.

Not sure why some of you are so shocked by this after all these years, players are NOT fans and will always, always follow the money - any club, any chairman, any manager - makes no difference, these two will not be playing Championship football next season.
0
Austin's contract Stand-off on 17:04 - Jan 15 with 2690 viewsPinnerPaul

Austin's contract Stand-off on 13:39 - Jan 15 by WestminsteRs

Also as he's under 23 he couldn't actually go for free I don't think. Would be a tribunal.


They only get "compensation" based on time he has been "developed" by the club - it has nothing to do with his commercial/market worth - so yes they/him DO still have decision to make.
0
Austin's contract Stand-off on 17:12 - Jan 15 with 2667 viewsdaveB

Austin's contract Stand-off on 12:06 - Jan 15 by Jamie

That means we can demand more money for him though and potentially shoe away potential suitors.

He unsurprisingly wants the transfer fee to be a slow as possible to ensure plenty of buyers. Doesn't want to risk ending up at someone like Hull.


We wouldn't though, if we go down he'll leave probably to a mid table side like a Newcastle or Stoke
0
Logo for 'BeGambleAware' Logo for 'BeGambleAware' Logo for 'GamStop' Gambling 18+
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024