Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Mayuka Is Gone For A Month ! But Will he Be Missed ?
Mayuka Is Gone For A Month ! But Will he Be Missed ?
Tuesday, 8th Jan 2013 10:18

Emmanuel Mayuka has gone off to the African Cup Of Nations with Zambia but will anyone notice.

For a player signed for a rumoured £3.5 million fee never in the history of Saints has a player been so overlooked.

When he originally arrived from Young Boys of Berne it was obvious why we had signed him, in that he had plenty of pace, initially it was thought by many Saints fans that he would be the answer to our problems out wide and add the pace we needed out there, however it soon became clear that Mayuka was a striker and if played on the wing was Ok going forward, but defensively was a liability.

A look at his record for Young Boys didnt actually suggest a £3.5 million pound striker, the Swiss Super League had been going since mid July and although Mayuka had made seven starts in it, he had only scored two goals and in most of the games seemed to get taken off just past the hour mark.

The big question though was given we had so many strikers on the books and that we intended to play a lone striker formation, why did we need another one ? Mayuka also looked a player that needed to feed off another striker up front and use his pace to get on the end of knock ons etc, even to the layman it seemed a strange signing because there seemed to be no logical place he could play in our preferred 4-5-1 formation and that just about his only function would be to perhaps come off the bench as an impact player.

That certainly seemed to be how Nigel Adkins viewed him and he gave him his debut off the bench after 75 minutes against Man Utd at St Mary's, Mayuka impressed the crowd with his pace, but its generally agreed that the managers substitutions cost us the game that day although all the blame cant be lumped on Mayuka for that.

Certainly though Adkins didnt seem to consider him an asset to the team and perhaps would have preferred to have kept Billy Sharp who not only had been in goalscoring form in mid  season, did genuinely offer a goalscoring threat, by the end of the West brom defeat away from home Adkins had used him only as a sub getting him off the bench six times out of a possible eight with a total game time of only 97 minutes.

After the West Brom game the manager seems to have decided that Mayuka was not the player for him, in the next six games Mayuka was on the bench for every game, but never got onto the pitch, even when as at Liverpool in the last ten minutes there seemed to be nothing to lose in chasing a game in which we were only a goal down, at that game I thought if Adkins doesnt bring him on in this situation whats the point in even having him on the bench.

But suddenly Mayuka was making his full debut for the visit of Sunderland a totally baffling selection which Nigel Adkins excused by saying that the player had been outstanding in a behind closed doors friendly, the Zambian lasted 55 minutes before being hauled off for the first appearance of the season for Steve De Ridder, certainly the manager had put something different on his cornflakes for this game which was a very disapointing defeat. Mayuka returned to the bench and again has been an unused sub for the three league games plus the visit of Chelsea in the Cup.

So Mayuka has now departed to join up with the Zambian squad and could now be away till the start of February at least in a tournament that begins on the 19th January and finishes on the 10th February.

But will he be missed, I would say perhaps not Adkins put him on the bench every week but in the past two months has been loath to play him despite many opportunities, perhaps most pertinent is that on Saturday against Chelsea Adkins used Tadanari Lee as his final sub, of course there was the fact that Mayuka is about to leave for Africa, but if thats the case why have him on the bench, Tadanari Lee looks to be the player who will benefit from the Zambian's absence and given his impact on his arrival last year, I think he will be an option on the bench that the manager feels far happier having than Mayuka.   

  

Photo: Action Images



Please report offensive, libellous or inappropriate posts by using the links provided.



stmichael added 12:05 - Jan 8
Seriously underused in my opinion.
He has something we are lacking all over the pitch which is pace.
His performances against Villa and Spurs suggest he is better than De Ridder.

Perhaps we have been reluctant to use him because of the African Nations Cup.

Zambia are a very useful National side and to be top scorer in that team in that competition suggests that he can play.

I am really confused as to why we have not used him.
0

VeloSaint added 12:27 - Jan 8
I think Nicks observations are bang on. He's a forward who needs to play off a partner, he's not a wide player at all. Maybe the powers that be thought he could be converted but I'd sooner play De Ridder then Mayuka. No idea why we bought him, to get the best out of him he'd need a steady run of games alongside Ricky which is never going to happen.

Also agree with the comment that Nigel would have preferred to keep Billy.

0

bstokesaint added 12:57 - Jan 8
I still haven't seen enough of him to decide either way if he'll be any good. Hopefully he'll have an outstanding African Nations and come back bang in form and confidence and force the manager's hand to show us what he can do. I'll make an effort to try and see him on the TV playing for his country in his normal position.
0

Dperc added 13:01 - Jan 8
It is baffling isn't it. Presumably they'll be monitoring his performance at the ACON and let's hope he gets a run of starts.

If we'd had 1 or 2 longer term injuries/suspensions the striker situation might not seem so strange. At least we've got some cover I guess.
0

SaintNick added 13:19 - Jan 8
St Michael, you are dead right he has pace, but the problem is its not in the areas that we need.

1. He is a forward and not a wing back, he can only play up front when he partners another forward, if we were playing two men up front then it would suit him to play alongside Lambert, but we dont so where did we expect to use him >

2. Yes he is better than De Ridder, against Villa he came on with 16 minutes left when we were 3-1 up and slaughtering them, against Spurs he came on and ran about a lot but what damage did he actually cause,for once we threw caution to the wind and nearly got the game back, but equally Spurs had a few breakaways second half when they could have buried us

3. Ultimately he hasnt produced the goods and the manager doesnt want to play him, he is a fish out of water, unless we change our playing stlye and formation then there is no point in him being here.

I dont buy the not using him because of the african nations cup thing, he has been here over four months yet barely got any game time there is a reason for that, if he was any good then we would have used him got the points needed so that we could afford for him not to go
0

zonehead added 17:03 - Jan 9
We have had 1/2 a season now to scource a goalie and a centre half to keep us up yet were still dithering and Fonte is injured too get on with nicola/Nigel
0


You need to login in order to post your comments

Blogs 32 bloggers

Knees-up Mother Brown #22 by wessex_exile

Ipswich Town Polls

About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024