Forum | Spackman by QPR1882 |

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Spackman 16:36 - Aug 26 with 1902 views

Was this not originally because someone started a match thread on a Tuesday night when we were playing on the Wednesday ?

Spackman on 16:40 - Aug 26 with 1882 views

simmo

FCK ME. Does it even matter what the definition of a Spackman is if you're starting threads about a subject that already has a thread? A thread that has a self explanatory title and sits on the front page for everyone to see??

ask Beavis I get nothing Butthead

Spackman on 16:41 - Aug 26 with 1876 views

danehoop

Isnt this thread a Spackman?

Never knowingly understood

Spackman on 16:44 - Aug 26 with 1855 views

QPR1882

calm down Simmo it is a question, hence the question mark.

I am under the impression it was something and i have asked the question to either find out if i was right or wrong. simples.

[Post edited 26 Aug 2014 17:02]

Spackman on 16:52 - Aug 26 with 1824 views

TacticalR

I really don't see how any progress is possible on this forum unless we can agree on the definition of a spackman.

Air hostess clique

Spackman on 17:11 - Aug 26 with 1778 views

kensalriser

No. I thought it had already been explained but you don't seem to want to accept the right definition! Which is the posting of something that's already been posted, ie the several dozen posted threads in short measure about Nigel Spackman's departure.

Poll:

QPR to finish 7th or Brentford to drop out of the top 6?

Spackman on 17:12 - Aug 26 with 1770 views

QPR1882

Spackman on 17:11 - Aug 26 by kensalriser
No. I thought it had already been explained but you don't seem to want to accept the right definition! Which is the posting of something that's already been posted, ie the several dozen posted threads in short measure about Nigel Spackman's departure.

Was not explained at all, but now it has I stand corrected

[Post edited 26 Aug 2014 17:21]

Spackman on 17:15 - Aug 26 with 1756 views

HantsR

Re the OP - I think the correct expression for the circumstances described is to do a Kettering?

Spackman on 17:19 - Aug 26 with 1739 views

QPR1882

Again I stand corrected

Spackman on 17:22 - Aug 26 with 1728 views

SomersetHoops

What is needed is the ability by the moderator (without too much effort 'cos I know Clive has enough to do) to combine threads on the same subject. Is that possible?

The other alternative is for people thinking about posting the same thing two hours or more after the original thread to read through recent post headings to ensure they aren't duplicating something already covered. Then they could add their thoughts to the original post. Is that possible?

Who's Next?

Spackman on 18:11 - Aug 26 with 1658 views

loftboy

Basically when Barnsley sacked spackman there was several posts on the matter when our old friend Tracey posted "Barnsley have sacked spackman" hence the birth of the duplicate post known as a Spackman

	favourite cheese mature Cheddar. FFS there is no such thing as the EPL
Poll:	Are you watching the World Cup

Spackman on 18:16 - Aug 26 with 1647 views

Juzzie

It's amazing how we've managed to keep to just one thread about Fulham when there are dozens about every other subject! Mainly Adel, 'arry, white panels on shirts and so on.

I'm going to start a thread about Fulham..... ;o)