| No subject 00:13 - Sep 4 with 14023 views | rochdaleriddler |
[Post edited 17 Oct 2016 15:02]
|  |
| |  |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 10:39 - Sep 4 with 7020 views | aleanddale |
Idiotic post.
No. |  | | |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 10:48 - Sep 4 with 6992 views | D_Alien |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 10:39 - Sep 4 by aleanddale |
Idiotic post.
No. |
Don't feed this tool |  |
| |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 16:20 - Sep 4 with 6652 views | howy10 |
Unbelievable. |  | | |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 20:13 - Sep 4 with 6371 views | rochdaleriddler |
bit tired and emotional when i posted this, just fed up with my weekends being brought down by these defeats, over 10% of season gone now, at what point do we question the way things are going? or is Hill untouchable now | |
| |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 20:16 - Sep 4 with 6355 views | rochdaleriddler |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 10:48 - Sep 4 by D_Alien |
Don't feed this tool |
abuse again i see, cant help it can you, Mr unpleasant?. You have often had a go at Hill | |
| |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 20:46 - Sep 4 with 6294 views | nordenblue |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 20:16 - Sep 4 by rochdaleriddler |
abuse again i see, cant help it can you, Mr unpleasant?. You have often had a go at Hill |
It's hardly surprising posting bollox like that,what kind of reaction did you want as that's what you wanted surely just peoples attention right?
Anybody even considering getting rid of Hill hasn't got a fookin clue | | | |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 21:09 - Sep 4 with 6237 views | roccydaleian |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 20:46 - Sep 4 by nordenblue |
It's hardly surprising posting bollox like that,what kind of reaction did you want as that's what you wanted surely just peoples attention right?
Anybody even considering getting rid of Hill hasn't got a fookin clue |
Think you have to cut Ridz (a YDism) some slack. Tired and emotional probably means pissed. |  | | |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 21:19 - Sep 4 with 6199 views | midlandsdale |
Slack maybe, but his point is a view and shouldn't be ridiculed just because you disagree. Any club that goes its first 6 games without a win, and is bottom of the league will inevitably raise the questions.
I don't think its time for Hill to go, and support him as our manager 100% but he shouldn't be immune from questions around his formation, tactics and team performance. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 21:22 - Sep 4 with 6192 views | rochdaleriddler |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 21:09 - Sep 4 by roccydaleian |
Think you have to cut Ridz (a YDism) some slack. Tired and emotional probably means pissed. |
i had been on the lash all day! | |
| |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 21:25 - Sep 4 with 6182 views | rochdaleriddler |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 20:46 - Sep 4 by nordenblue |
It's hardly surprising posting bollox like that,what kind of reaction did you want as that's what you wanted surely just peoples attention right?
Anybody even considering getting rid of Hill hasn't got a fookin clue |
it just said taxi for hill ?, i didnt offer my opinion so how have i posted bollox. if everything turns round, thats great but what if it doesnt? are people not allowed to question his continuing suitability? perhaps just get a director to tell me to fook off. I know my place | |
| |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 21:26 - Sep 4 with 6181 views | fitzochris |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 21:22 - Sep 4 by rochdaleriddler |
i had been on the lash all day! |
What is that fookin' profile pic all about? |  |
| |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 21:31 - Sep 4 with 6164 views | rochdaleriddler |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 21:26 - Sep 4 by fitzochris |
What is that fookin' profile pic all about? |
just a pic of a chunky lass | |
| |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 21:41 - Sep 4 with 6122 views | D_Alien |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 20:16 - Sep 4 by rochdaleriddler |
abuse again i see, cant help it can you, Mr unpleasant?. You have often had a go at Hill |
Nowt wrong with being unpleasant, it's what happens when someone posts abusive shite
Sure, i put views forward on hill, both good and bad, quite often when I've had a few, but none of it abusive towards him
Look at yourself first | |
| |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 21:46 - Sep 4 with 6107 views | nordenblue |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 21:19 - Sep 4 by midlandsdale |
Slack maybe, but his point is a view and shouldn't be ridiculed just because you disagree. Any club that goes its first 6 games without a win, and is bottom of the league will inevitably raise the questions.
I don't think its time for Hill to go, and support him as our manager 100% but he shouldn't be immune from questions around his formation, tactics and team performance. |
There's several other posts on the forum where people are doing just that in a manner open to debate.
"Taxi for Hill" is merely saying it's time for him to leave,without any form of reasoning or explanation why.I personally think after what he has done for the club the least people can do regardless of opinion is show the man a little more respect. | | | |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 21:46 - Sep 4 with 6106 views | TVOS1907 |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 21:25 - Sep 4 by rochdaleriddler |
it just said taxi for hill ?, i didnt offer my opinion so how have i posted bollox. if everything turns round, thats great but what if it doesnt? are people not allowed to question his continuing suitability? perhaps just get a director to tell me to fook off. I know my place |
But on another thread you aggressively questioned if Hill was immune from criticism.
He's not; one look at this board in recent weeks should answer that question for you. |  |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 21:56 - Sep 4 with 6059 views | midlandsdale |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 21:46 - Sep 4 by nordenblue |
There's several other posts on the forum where people are doing just that in a manner open to debate.
"Taxi for Hill" is merely saying it's time for him to leave,without any form of reasoning or explanation why.I personally think after what he has done for the club the least people can do regardless of opinion is show the man a little more respect. |
I didnt read it as disrespectful but I guess we can read things in a different way. There is no way even if we got relegated Hill would be sacked. Opinions opinions | | | |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 22:08 - Sep 4 with 6027 views | D_Alien |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 21:56 - Sep 4 by midlandsdale |
I didnt read it as disrespectful but I guess we can read things in a different way. There is no way even if we got relegated Hill would be sacked. Opinions opinions |
Agree with that. If we were to be relegated, Hill would be the only manager I'd be confident would take us back up again. | |
| |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 22:14 - Sep 4 with 6007 views | nordenblue |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 21:56 - Sep 4 by midlandsdale |
I didnt read it as disrespectful but I guess we can read things in a different way. There is no way even if we got relegated Hill would be sacked. Opinions opinions |
I'd say it's pretty disrespectful to suggest sacking the most successful man in the clubs history after 6 games regardless of how it reads tbf..
Im not a lover of Hilly as a bloke I'll be honest and some of his decisions are baffling(being kind) but as a manager his record stands up to anybody,for that alone he deserves time, without tools on here creating extra pressures. | | | |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 12:06 - Sep 5 with 5652 views | rochdaleriddler |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 22:14 - Sep 4 by nordenblue |
I'd say it's pretty disrespectful to suggest sacking the most successful man in the clubs history after 6 games regardless of how it reads tbf..
Im not a lover of Hilly as a bloke I'll be honest and some of his decisions are baffling(being kind) but as a manager his record stands up to anybody,for that alone he deserves time, without tools on here creating extra pressures. |
I didn't , there was a question mark at the end of the sentence. I have the utmost respect for Hill's achievements. After watching the dross from the early 70's and during the eyre and Coleman years, his ability to achieve what he has amazed me. There is that respectful enough? Btw I never boo players, never gather round the dugouts shouting bollocks, I support my team. This is a forum, if we all say the same thing it's boring. | |
| |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 17:25 - Sep 5 with 5417 views | nordenblue |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 12:06 - Sep 5 by rochdaleriddler |
I didn't , there was a question mark at the end of the sentence. I have the utmost respect for Hill's achievements. After watching the dross from the early 70's and during the eyre and Coleman years, his ability to achieve what he has amazed me. There is that respectful enough? Btw I never boo players, never gather round the dugouts shouting bollocks, I support my team. This is a forum, if we all say the same thing it's boring. |
Your post was insinuating it's time for Hilly to leave I'm assuming by your "taxi" remark,with no opinion or reasoning behind it,after only 6 yes that's right SIX games!!!
Don't write a reaction provoking post then moan when people react to it.... | | | |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 17:05 - Sep 6 with 5087 views | midlandsdale |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 17:25 - Sep 5 by nordenblue |
Your post was insinuating it's time for Hilly to leave I'm assuming by your "taxi" remark,with no opinion or reasoning behind it,after only 6 yes that's right SIX games!!!
Don't write a reaction provoking post then moan when people react to it.... |
Its your opinion Norden, not fact | | | |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 17:14 - Sep 6 with 5066 views | nordenblue |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 17:05 - Sep 6 by midlandsdale |
Its your opinion Norden, not fact |
What's my opinion and not fact,that we've only played 6 league games or that Hilly deserves more respect? | | | |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 17:22 - Sep 6 with 5053 views | midlandsdale |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 17:14 - Sep 6 by nordenblue |
What's my opinion and not fact,that we've only played 6 league games or that Hilly deserves more respect? |
That the post is disrespectful. Its just a question. To respond with the insults to the original post is over the top and in my opinion not warranted. I get it that you don't agree, everyone who has read this gets it that you don't agree, but its your opinion. | | | |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 18:19 - Sep 6 with 4997 views | D_Alien |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 17:22 - Sep 6 by midlandsdale |
That the post is disrespectful. Its just a question. To respond with the insults to the original post is over the top and in my opinion not warranted. I get it that you don't agree, everyone who has read this gets it that you don't agree, but its your opinion. |
This "opinion" argument is nonsense. You need to take into account people's history on this messageboard. Fair enough if you don't read it often enough to do so, but then you're missing an important point.
RR has history, he'd probably accept that, just as I accept I have history on here. He says I'm being unpleasant towards him, and it's not just his opinion, it's fact. Both I and nordenblue regard his post as being disrespectful as fact for the same reason. | |
| |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 18:30 - Sep 6 with 4969 views | nordenblue |
| Taxi for hill? (n/t) on 17:22 - Sep 6 by midlandsdale |
That the post is disrespectful. Its just a question. To respond with the insults to the original post is over the top and in my opinion not warranted. I get it that you don't agree, everyone who has read this gets it that you don't agree, but its your opinion. |
It appears it's an opinion shared by quite a few others too then judging by the marks down the original post has received?
I've explained my point before so won't bother going over old ground...and I still stand by its a tool of a thing to do without any form of reasoning behind it.
That's only your opinion too that you think it's not warranted..... | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
