| Rethink on going to away games. 10:41 - Jul 28 with 9149 views | BigKindo |
ULEZ. The Mayor of London, Khan, has won the court case and will go ahead with his plans to charge those with non-compliant vehicles £ 12-50/day. . Visits to Barnet, Woking etc will be affected. Residents who live within the zone will be offered up to £ 2000 scrappage if you meet certain criteria eg disability. This will not be offered to those who live outside the zone. On two visits to family this year in London there is a definite feeling that there is public disquiet about this - perhaps demonstrated last week at the result of the bye- election in Boris Johnson's parliamentary seat. So minimum pay workers at, say, Heathrow who work unsocial hours over a 5 day week using a non-exempted vehicle will have to stump up £ 62-50 to get to and from work. As we visit family now resident within ULEZ some weeks ago I had a letter from 'Khan' asking me to put my credit card details on my Transport for London account so they can automatically debit me.
Great hews indeed for the Gtr. Manchester elected Mayor Burnham. Wait for a leaflet coming through your letterbox |  | | |  |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 11:36 - Jul 28 with 7808 views | isitme |
But free school meals! |  | | |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 11:49 - Jul 28 with 7766 views | krafty80 |
It's really worth checking if your car isn't compliant --- more than 90% of vehicles will be. You also wouldn't be charged anyway if you go to Woking, Dorking, Maidenhead etc, as the M25 isn't in the zone. I think the venues affected in the NL are Bromley, Borehamwood, Barnet and Dagenham.
I live in London and the general consensus is that, much like the original congestion charge and things like the pub smoking ban, there's been a moral panic about ULEZ but once it's implemented, people will be surprised how little they notice it. This is a rare example of political courage from Sadiq, given it has obviously caused him a lot of grief (despite most of the arguments against ULEZ being contradicted by actual data -- the poorest social groups in London are the least likely either to drive or own cars, for example). Burnham is too much of a political opportunist to follow suit, but his successor will probably have to address the air pollution problem. It's a basic public health issue at the end of the day. |  | | |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 13:51 - Jul 28 with 7606 views | BigKindo |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 11:49 - Jul 28 by krafty80 |
It's really worth checking if your car isn't compliant --- more than 90% of vehicles will be. You also wouldn't be charged anyway if you go to Woking, Dorking, Maidenhead etc, as the M25 isn't in the zone. I think the venues affected in the NL are Bromley, Borehamwood, Barnet and Dagenham.
I live in London and the general consensus is that, much like the original congestion charge and things like the pub smoking ban, there's been a moral panic about ULEZ but once it's implemented, people will be surprised how little they notice it. This is a rare example of political courage from Sadiq, given it has obviously caused him a lot of grief (despite most of the arguments against ULEZ being contradicted by actual data -- the poorest social groups in London are the least likely either to drive or own cars, for example). Burnham is too much of a political opportunist to follow suit, but his successor will probably have to address the air pollution problem. It's a basic public health issue at the end of the day. |
If you realise what I wrote my car isn't compliant. I only do about 2000 miles/annum - trips to family in London, and short journeys to Spotland etc. So I am expected to go out and purchase a complying car.
Khan was reaping in the 'tax' from the City Centre congestion/ULEZ. Everybody in Kensington, Chelsea etc who can well afford it went out and bought electric cars etc. So his tax take went down. His coffers are now much reduced and require replenishing. From my visits to London I formed a different opinion to you of what the general public feels about Khan. But now the gates are open for the usual policy of 'political creep'. Non-complying vehicles from next month. And then "The ULEZ is working well so next month we will start charging those who drive red cars."
Some time ago I read a report that the majority of pollution in London is now being caused by Cruise Liners berthing at Tower Bridge. When berthed they continue to generate electricity from continual use of their engines by burning low quality diesel. That same problem is now producing excessive pollution in amongst others, e.g. Southampton. So why doesn't Khan ban Cruise Liners? Oh no we cannot do that. They bring tourists who spend money in London. Khan wants to have his cake and eat it.
I am saddened that you should want to write off the poorest social groups. They are perhaps the catering staff at Heathrow, the night security staff on building sites etc., low paid, working unsocial hours and in need of transport during those unsocial hours, when TFL cannot get the to their places of employment. It appears yet again that those most vulnerable in our society will suffer yet again.
It would have been interesting to be a fly on the wall today when Keir Starmer rang Khan. | | | |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 17:14 - Jul 28 with 7448 views | Yorkshire_Dale |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 13:51 - Jul 28 by BigKindo |
If you realise what I wrote my car isn't compliant. I only do about 2000 miles/annum - trips to family in London, and short journeys to Spotland etc. So I am expected to go out and purchase a complying car.
Khan was reaping in the 'tax' from the City Centre congestion/ULEZ. Everybody in Kensington, Chelsea etc who can well afford it went out and bought electric cars etc. So his tax take went down. His coffers are now much reduced and require replenishing. From my visits to London I formed a different opinion to you of what the general public feels about Khan. But now the gates are open for the usual policy of 'political creep'. Non-complying vehicles from next month. And then "The ULEZ is working well so next month we will start charging those who drive red cars."
Some time ago I read a report that the majority of pollution in London is now being caused by Cruise Liners berthing at Tower Bridge. When berthed they continue to generate electricity from continual use of their engines by burning low quality diesel. That same problem is now producing excessive pollution in amongst others, e.g. Southampton. So why doesn't Khan ban Cruise Liners? Oh no we cannot do that. They bring tourists who spend money in London. Khan wants to have his cake and eat it.
I am saddened that you should want to write off the poorest social groups. They are perhaps the catering staff at Heathrow, the night security staff on building sites etc., low paid, working unsocial hours and in need of transport during those unsocial hours, when TFL cannot get the to their places of employment. It appears yet again that those most vulnerable in our society will suffer yet again.
It would have been interesting to be a fly on the wall today when Keir Starmer rang Khan. |
Khan is doing a great deal of damage to Labour's surge to No 10, at least in the Big Apple.
Starmer might have given him a mouth full? |  | | |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 17:55 - Jul 28 with 7386 views | Newbury_Dale |
Travelling fans to Barnet and Woking could use the club coach. Or car share with fans who have compliant cars. Or pre-book the train. | | | |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 18:50 - Jul 28 with 7316 views | jonahwhereru |
Regardless of the arguments I applaud that a politician has bitten the bullet on a scheme that they knew would make them less popular. A rare occurrence in politics these days.
Green issues will be a important issue come the next election. It will be interesting to see who of those with progressive, or don’t rock the boat attitudes will prevail.
Plenty of those Climate campaigning school kids from a few year ago will be able to vote at the next election. But Green economics are expensive.
It’s a real dilemma for the political leaders. | | | |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 19:40 - Jul 28 with 7247 views | 49thseason |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 18:50 - Jul 28 by jonahwhereru |
Regardless of the arguments I applaud that a politician has bitten the bullet on a scheme that they knew would make them less popular. A rare occurrence in politics these days.
Green issues will be a important issue come the next election. It will be interesting to see who of those with progressive, or don’t rock the boat attitudes will prevail.
Plenty of those Climate campaigning school kids from a few year ago will be able to vote at the next election. But Green economics are expensive.
It’s a real dilemma for the political leaders. |
Its an unpopular way to raise £2bn quid a year from people who can least afford it. To use the Lefts favourite mantra, " no one voted for this" .. I see Niknak has had to step in and take over house building from Khan't because he has bèen spectacularly unsuccessful at it.... not that there is any way in the world they can build 300,000 houses a year anyway.
Nothing works properly in this country anymore, there are millions sucking on the Government tit, umpteen levels of buraucracy, with more degrees between them than were given out in the previous 100 years combined and everything they touch turns to rats. The simple fact is this... we are saddled with £3.8 trillion of old age pension liabilities and £1.2 trillion of public service pensions liabilities and those figures are 10 years old! And everyone keeps kicking the can down the road in the hope it will go away. We would have to use the whole of the UKs GDP to pay out on those liabilities. In short, the educated idiots have shafted us all with the rough end of a pineapple.
Add to those numbers £12billion a month on debt payments on borrowing and it becomes clear that this and every other western country is utterly bust .. its just that no one dares to admit it. My only suggestion for anyone who has a number of years ahead of them is to invest in gold and silver, often and as much as you can afford. Oh, and tell every so-called politician you meet to get stuffed with prejudice, irrespective of which side of the uniparty they represent. |  | | |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 20:11 - Jul 28 with 7211 views | jonahwhereru |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 19:40 - Jul 28 by 49thseason |
Its an unpopular way to raise £2bn quid a year from people who can least afford it. To use the Lefts favourite mantra, " no one voted for this" .. I see Niknak has had to step in and take over house building from Khan't because he has bèen spectacularly unsuccessful at it.... not that there is any way in the world they can build 300,000 houses a year anyway.
Nothing works properly in this country anymore, there are millions sucking on the Government tit, umpteen levels of buraucracy, with more degrees between them than were given out in the previous 100 years combined and everything they touch turns to rats. The simple fact is this... we are saddled with £3.8 trillion of old age pension liabilities and £1.2 trillion of public service pensions liabilities and those figures are 10 years old! And everyone keeps kicking the can down the road in the hope it will go away. We would have to use the whole of the UKs GDP to pay out on those liabilities. In short, the educated idiots have shafted us all with the rough end of a pineapple.
Add to those numbers £12billion a month on debt payments on borrowing and it becomes clear that this and every other western country is utterly bust .. its just that no one dares to admit it. My only suggestion for anyone who has a number of years ahead of them is to invest in gold and silver, often and as much as you can afford. Oh, and tell every so-called politician you meet to get stuffed with prejudice, irrespective of which side of the uniparty they represent. |
Well 49th that contribute should have sucked any hope out of those that had any left.
But you know what they say about hope... | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Rethink on going to away games. on 20:18 - Jul 28 with 7197 views | TVOS1907 |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 17:55 - Jul 28 by Newbury_Dale |
Travelling fans to Barnet and Woking could use the club coach. Or car share with fans who have compliant cars. Or pre-book the train. |
Or park up at a Tube station somewhere outside the relevant zones. |  |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 21:48 - Jul 28 with 7103 views | windowsbug2002 |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 20:18 - Jul 28 by TVOS1907 |
Or park up at a Tube station somewhere outside the relevant zones. |
Or.... buy a classic vehicle. Anything over 40 years old.
No tax, no mot, no London charges.
From the transport for london site.
Historic vehicles
You can apply with the DVLA stop paying vehicle tax if your vehicle was built more than 40 years ago. This date moves forward on a 40-year rolling system. For example, when the ULEZ launched in April 2019, vehicles built before 1979 were eligible to apply for historic vehicle tax class.
All vehicles that have a historic vehicle tax class are exempt from the ULEZ. This tax class excludes any vehicle used commercially (for example, coffee vans or street food vans).
In line with the existing LEZ discount all vehicles constructed before 1 January 1973 are exempt from the ULEZ, regardless of commercial use or otherwise.
If your vehicle meets the above criteria but is registered outside the UK, it is also exempt, but you will need to register it with us before travelling in the zone. [Post edited 29 Jul 2023 16:08]
|  | | |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 11:57 - Jul 29 with 6854 views | DorkingDale |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 20:18 - Jul 28 by TVOS1907 |
Or park up at a Tube station somewhere outside the relevant zones. |
Have you tried parking near a tube station recently?! Near on impossible unless there is a car park. I used to park in the streets close to Southfields but they have put yellow lines down everywhere. I needed to get to Hammersmith to a concert during a rail strike & had to pay to park on somebody's drive. | | | |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 12:07 - Jul 29 with 6842 views | DorkingDale |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 17:14 - Jul 28 by Yorkshire_Dale |
Khan is doing a great deal of damage to Labour's surge to No 10, at least in the Big Apple.
Starmer might have given him a mouth full? |
ULEZ is certainly extremely unpopular and I hear it mentioned a lot around here because it will impact on people travelling from outside the zone to places you wouldn't necessarily consider to be London like Sutton, Chessington & Kingston.
Khan has been an ineffective mayor & is desperately trying to achieve some kind of legacy but I think it will come back to bite him in May. The Tory candidate is also targeting the much-hated implementation of low traffic zones (where they have blocked off residential streets & forced more traffic onto main roads). They have just resulted in bigger jams and longer journeys - and yes, you guessed it, more pollution. The man's an idiot. | | | |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 12:11 - Jul 29 with 6827 views | TVOS1907 |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 11:57 - Jul 29 by DorkingDale |
Have you tried parking near a tube station recently?! Near on impossible unless there is a car park. I used to park in the streets close to Southfields but they have put yellow lines down everywhere. I needed to get to Hammersmith to a concert during a rail strike & had to pay to park on somebody's drive. |
No, can't say I have; London's not the sort of place I visit unless I have to.
it was just an alternative suggestion. [Post edited 29 Jul 2023 12:19]
| |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 12:25 - Jul 29 with 6805 views | D_Alien |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 12:11 - Jul 29 by TVOS1907 |
No, can't say I have; London's not the sort of place I visit unless I have to.
it was just an alternative suggestion. [Post edited 29 Jul 2023 12:19]
|
Finchley Central's always a good bet. Big car park, easy access off the M1 and you're on the network |  |
| |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 12:36 - Jul 29 with 6788 views | EllDale |
From memory an underground line is overground going past The Hive (if that makes sense) so there must be a tube station somewhere near. | | | |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 13:00 - Jul 29 with 6769 views | DorkingDale |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 12:36 - Jul 29 by EllDale |
From memory an underground line is overground going past The Hive (if that makes sense) so there must be a tube station somewhere near. |
Yes - Jubilee Line, but it only goes as far as Stanmore which will be in the ULEZ zone unfortunately. | | | |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 13:05 - Jul 29 with 6755 views | DorkingDale |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 12:11 - Jul 29 by TVOS1907 |
No, can't say I have; London's not the sort of place I visit unless I have to.
it was just an alternative suggestion. [Post edited 29 Jul 2023 12:19]
|
Good thought TVOS, but unfortunately they connive to punish motorists from all directions - local councils as well as City Hall. TFL & the rail companies charge ridiculous parking fees at stations too.
And once they have you on public transport they go on bloody strike..... | | | |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 13:31 - Jul 29 with 6720 views | BigKindo |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 20:18 - Jul 28 by TVOS1907 |
Or park up at a Tube station somewhere outside the relevant zones. |
Thanks but my family will in future reside within the ULEZ. So I have to drive in and out of the zone i.e. the day I arrive and the day I depart. If I use the car on any other days within the ULEZ that's another charge. To visit family for , say, the Dorking game weekend staying from Friday to Sunday will cost me £ 37-50 plus of course the on street non resident parking charge levied by Ealing Council. | | | |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 13:50 - Jul 29 with 6670 views | BigKindo |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 12:07 - Jul 29 by DorkingDale |
ULEZ is certainly extremely unpopular and I hear it mentioned a lot around here because it will impact on people travelling from outside the zone to places you wouldn't necessarily consider to be London like Sutton, Chessington & Kingston.
Khan has been an ineffective mayor & is desperately trying to achieve some kind of legacy but I think it will come back to bite him in May. The Tory candidate is also targeting the much-hated implementation of low traffic zones (where they have blocked off residential streets & forced more traffic onto main roads). They have just resulted in bigger jams and longer journeys - and yes, you guessed it, more pollution. The man's an idiot. |
Do you recall the peoples question time event at Ealing Town Hall in early March when he publicly called protesters Far Right, Covid Deniers and Vaccine Deniers. He was asked to resign but wouldn't. He is turning Gtr London into a dictatorship.
In an earlier post I made reference to the excessive pollution being created by Cruise Liners berthing at Tower Bridge. This week the City of Amsterdam announced that they would no longer allow Cruise Ships to berth there because of the excessive pollution. | | | |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 17:34 - Jul 29 with 6529 views | DorkingDale |
Yep - he's got away with murder for 2 terms, but hasn't had to face a credible rival at the polls.
It might be cheaper for you to catch the train than drive once you allow for petrol & depreciation.... | | | |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 18:44 - Jul 29 with 6435 views | Porlicks |
Why not get a car that doesn't make the rest of the human race choke on your fumes? |  |
| |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 08:24 - Jul 30 with 6276 views | BigKindo |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 18:44 - Jul 29 by Porlicks |
Why not get a car that doesn't make the rest of the human race choke on your fumes? |
So, me being a state pensioner, you expect me to go out and spend 10s of thousands on a new vehicle. Read my posts. I only drive 2000 miles/annum. Why did I buy a diesel car? Because the politicians of the day encouraged me and many others to do so in that they would prefer drivers to purchase diesel powered vehicles. This isn't about pollution It is about Khan replenishing his much depleted coffers at the cost of those at the lower end of the social scale. If it was about pollution he should take a leaf out of Amsterdam's book, and immediately ban Cruise Liners berthing at Tower Bridge. But that would destroy a relative new stream of tourist revenue.
Now if you'd like to dig deep and buy me a car ......... | | | |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 14:02 - Jul 30 with 6164 views | Rodingdale |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 08:24 - Jul 30 by BigKindo |
So, me being a state pensioner, you expect me to go out and spend 10s of thousands on a new vehicle. Read my posts. I only drive 2000 miles/annum. Why did I buy a diesel car? Because the politicians of the day encouraged me and many others to do so in that they would prefer drivers to purchase diesel powered vehicles. This isn't about pollution It is about Khan replenishing his much depleted coffers at the cost of those at the lower end of the social scale. If it was about pollution he should take a leaf out of Amsterdam's book, and immediately ban Cruise Liners berthing at Tower Bridge. But that would destroy a relative new stream of tourist revenue.
Now if you'd like to dig deep and buy me a car ......... |
London receives relatively few cruise liners, the vast majority mooring at Tilbury in Essex. A small number of smaller liners do moor at the Tower of London, however the Thames is operated under the sole jurisdiction of the Port of London Authority. Nothing to do with the GLA.
ULEZ is about clean air - because the link between street level air pollution and deaths from respiratory conditions is irrefutable. If Khan simply wanted to raise revenue he could extend the conjestion zone, so it’s a sensible compromise to continue to allow vehicles to drive in London with the exception of the most polluting ones, the charge, it is hoped will be a deterrent. | | | |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 21:02 - Jul 30 with 6025 views | krafty80 |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 14:02 - Jul 30 by Rodingdale |
London receives relatively few cruise liners, the vast majority mooring at Tilbury in Essex. A small number of smaller liners do moor at the Tower of London, however the Thames is operated under the sole jurisdiction of the Port of London Authority. Nothing to do with the GLA.
ULEZ is about clean air - because the link between street level air pollution and deaths from respiratory conditions is irrefutable. If Khan simply wanted to raise revenue he could extend the conjestion zone, so it’s a sensible compromise to continue to allow vehicles to drive in London with the exception of the most polluting ones, the charge, it is hoped will be a deterrent. |
I've lived in London since 2006 and I have never heard about cruise liners making it as far as Tower Bridge either -- Google suggests there is a terminal, but I imagine the Thames Barrier makes this difficult for the largest vessels anyway.
Coming back to Khan, I do find it a bit alarming how differently he's perceived in London compared to outside. I should stress I'm not a natural Labour voter at all, but I can see that he's made two big commitments to make the lives of Londoners better, one by trying to reduce air pollution and two by building a lot more social housing.
I really want to stress that, while the outer London boroughs are maybe a bit more traditional in their views than inner London, the vast majority of Londoners are deeply upset by the inequality of wealth in the city. After all, millions of us are from other parts of the country and don't want to live in some mad bubble for the super rich. So it's no surprise the capital is becoming more left wing; frankly, Sadiq is as good as nailed on to win a third term and ULEZ won't change that. This is probably why the backlash on the right has been so vitriolic.
People complaining about loss of 'freedom' from not driving: are you really saying the c25% of British adults who don't have a driving licence are effectively prisoners?
I think the ULEZ expansion was nailed on from the moment in 2020 that a coroner ruled that nine year-old Ella Kissa-Debrah died from pollution-related asthma. Once legal precedent was set, serious action was always going to follow. | | | |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 16:20 - Jul 31 with 5863 views | DorkingDale |
| Rethink on going to away games. on 21:02 - Jul 30 by krafty80 |
I've lived in London since 2006 and I have never heard about cruise liners making it as far as Tower Bridge either -- Google suggests there is a terminal, but I imagine the Thames Barrier makes this difficult for the largest vessels anyway.
Coming back to Khan, I do find it a bit alarming how differently he's perceived in London compared to outside. I should stress I'm not a natural Labour voter at all, but I can see that he's made two big commitments to make the lives of Londoners better, one by trying to reduce air pollution and two by building a lot more social housing.
I really want to stress that, while the outer London boroughs are maybe a bit more traditional in their views than inner London, the vast majority of Londoners are deeply upset by the inequality of wealth in the city. After all, millions of us are from other parts of the country and don't want to live in some mad bubble for the super rich. So it's no surprise the capital is becoming more left wing; frankly, Sadiq is as good as nailed on to win a third term and ULEZ won't change that. This is probably why the backlash on the right has been so vitriolic.
People complaining about loss of 'freedom' from not driving: are you really saying the c25% of British adults who don't have a driving licence are effectively prisoners?
I think the ULEZ expansion was nailed on from the moment in 2020 that a coroner ruled that nine year-old Ella Kissa-Debrah died from pollution-related asthma. Once legal precedent was set, serious action was always going to follow. |
I've seen Tower Bridge open for cruise liners before now - we're not talking about Royal Caribbean type mega liners.
I disagree about Khan & his achievements in building social housing - he's nowhere near reaching the numbers he committed to. If he really wants to do something he should address the number of "luxury" apartments that are permanently empty and are purely investments for rich foreigners. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
