Trialist 14:49 - Jul 22 with 11412 views | KenBoon | Joins Salford City Not sure what to think. | | | | |
Trialist on 15:06 - Jul 22 with 8337 views | nordenblue | Strange move,you'd think hes been offered "silly" money to join them dropping that far down...... | | | |
Trialist on 15:10 - Jul 22 with 8308 views | D_Alien | What to think? Unless Hill decided not to offer a contract (strange after paying for him to go to Tenerife followed by a hat-trick) - then he's simply used us to get fit | |
| |
Trialist on 15:13 - Jul 22 with 8278 views | SuddenLad | And having now seen him at close quarters for 2 weeks after he had regained his fitness, KH has decided he has nothing to offer that others already can't provide. Why waste a wage ? | |
| “It is easier to fool people, than to convince them that they have been fooled†|
| |
Trialist on 15:19 - Jul 22 with 8232 views | DaleFan7 | Good news. | | | |
Trialist on 17:13 - Jul 22 with 7910 views | D_Alien |
Trialist on 15:13 - Jul 22 by SuddenLad | And having now seen him at close quarters for 2 weeks after he had regained his fitness, KH has decided he has nothing to offer that others already can't provide. Why waste a wage ? |
Goals? Converting chances? Which is why he brought him back during last season, and which Redshaw duly demonstrated he's able to deliver, when fit. Otherwise, why bother, and waste the outlay we've already put into him? The interpretation that Redshaw isn't able to deliver what others don't therefore simply doesn't add up. There may be other reasons IF Hill decided he didn't warrant a contract, but having nothing to offer that others can't provide just can't be one of them | |
| |
Trialist on 17:20 - Jul 22 with 7858 views | ColDale |
Trialist on 17:13 - Jul 22 by D_Alien | Goals? Converting chances? Which is why he brought him back during last season, and which Redshaw duly demonstrated he's able to deliver, when fit. Otherwise, why bother, and waste the outlay we've already put into him? The interpretation that Redshaw isn't able to deliver what others don't therefore simply doesn't add up. There may be other reasons IF Hill decided he didn't warrant a contract, but having nothing to offer that others can't provide just can't be one of them |
Perhaps Redshaw was here as back up as we pursued an attacking left sided player, and once that deal was done, there was no place for Redshaw and he's gone off with our blessing. | | | |
Trialist on 17:22 - Jul 22 with 7850 views | fitzochris |
Trialist on 17:20 - Jul 22 by ColDale | Perhaps Redshaw was here as back up as we pursued an attacking left sided player, and once that deal was done, there was no place for Redshaw and he's gone off with our blessing. |
That sounds likely after today... | |
| |
Trialist on 17:31 - Jul 22 with 7788 views | Clivert |
Trialist on 17:22 - Jul 22 by fitzochris | That sounds likely after today... |
I hope that it's a Done deal then. [Post edited 22 Jul 2017 17:41]
| | | | Login to get fewer ads
Trialist on 17:43 - Jul 22 with 7727 views | TVOS1907 |
Trialist on 17:20 - Jul 22 by ColDale | Perhaps Redshaw was here as back up as we pursued an attacking left sided player, and once that deal was done, there was no place for Redshaw and he's gone off with our blessing. |
Deja-vu? | |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
Trialist on 17:43 - Jul 22 with 7720 views | Shun |
Trialist on 17:22 - Jul 22 by fitzochris | That sounds likely after today... |
Have you heard some exciting news? | | | |
Trialist on 18:08 - Jul 22 with 7606 views | fitzochris |
Trialist on 17:43 - Jul 22 by Shun | Have you heard some exciting news? |
My wife's expecting. | |
| |
Trialist on 18:11 - Jul 22 with 7592 views | AtThePeake |
Trialist on 15:10 - Jul 22 by D_Alien | What to think? Unless Hill decided not to offer a contract (strange after paying for him to go to Tenerife followed by a hat-trick) - then he's simply used us to get fit |
Salford may well have offered him a better deal than us. Given his career trajectory and injury problems I don't think we'd have been willing to offer two years or large wages. They've just turned professional I think and may see him as the marquee star signing to help continue their push for league football so may have been willing to throw serious money at him. Also believe he's based in Salford, although obviously it wouldn't exactly be a difficult commute to Rochdale from there. | |
| |
Trialist on 18:28 - Jul 22 with 7527 views | D_Alien |
Trialist on 18:11 - Jul 22 by AtThePeake | Salford may well have offered him a better deal than us. Given his career trajectory and injury problems I don't think we'd have been willing to offer two years or large wages. They've just turned professional I think and may see him as the marquee star signing to help continue their push for league football so may have been willing to throw serious money at him. Also believe he's based in Salford, although obviously it wouldn't exactly be a difficult commute to Rochdale from there. |
You're probably right, it just leaves a slightly sour taste that we've given him a pre-season for nothing. It's difficult to imagine the offer from Salford has just come out of the blue, although they were probably waiting to see what his fitness was like | |
| |
Trialist on 18:30 - Jul 22 with 7515 views | TVOS1907 |
Trialist on 18:28 - Jul 22 by D_Alien | You're probably right, it just leaves a slightly sour taste that we've given him a pre-season for nothing. It's difficult to imagine the offer from Salford has just come out of the blue, although they were probably waiting to see what his fitness was like |
Maybe we hadn't offered him anything yet and then Salford came in. Until we hear otherwise, it's currently all speculation. | |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
Trialist on 18:31 - Jul 22 with 7499 views | boromat | Keith talks about it in his post match. Sounds to me like we were never going to sign him and that he was just given the opportunity to train with us. It also sounds like money has spoken Keith a little disappointed to see Jack playing at such a level and says he should be playing in the football league but he needs to play and wouldn't have been guaranteed that with us. | |
| |
Trialist on 18:32 - Jul 22 with 7495 views | ColDale | Hilly says in his interview that Redshaw went to him yesterday and told him about the offer. Hilly agreed it was the right thing for Redshaw to do but he feels that he's good enough to be playing League Football - he expects him to do so with Salford. | | | |
Trialist on 18:38 - Jul 22 with 7452 views | D_Alien |
Trialist on 18:31 - Jul 22 by boromat | Keith talks about it in his post match. Sounds to me like we were never going to sign him and that he was just given the opportunity to train with us. It also sounds like money has spoken Keith a little disappointed to see Jack playing at such a level and says he should be playing in the football league but he needs to play and wouldn't have been guaranteed that with us. |
Which pretty much confirms what I've been saying Since when have we been able to hand out free fitness sessions, especially when they include plane tickets and accommodation? Which player was denied an opportunity against Chorley? I'd rather have seen a 15yo youth team prospect given a run out [Post edited 22 Jul 2017 18:39]
| |
| |
Trialist on 20:35 - Jul 22 with 7189 views | Thacks_Rabbits | I really don't believe a word Keith is saying re redshaw. We had him with view to signing hence the loan. He gets offered a good contract with Salford, he goes to Keith and says this has been offered at another club, will you match it, Keith says not yet, prove yourself, redshaw goes to Salford. Guessing at a lot of that but personally glad as redshaw is the type of player who should be working with john Coleman. Attitude wrong and would sooner see gillam given a chance | |
| |
Trialist on 20:39 - Jul 22 with 7164 views | Yorkshire_Dale |
Trialist on 18:38 - Jul 22 by D_Alien | Which pretty much confirms what I've been saying Since when have we been able to hand out free fitness sessions, especially when they include plane tickets and accommodation? Which player was denied an opportunity against Chorley? I'd rather have seen a 15yo youth team prospect given a run out [Post edited 22 Jul 2017 18:39]
|
........and we nursed/baby sat him through his shinsplits injury on loan last season, are we the NHS? | | | |
Trialist on 21:12 - Jul 22 with 7073 views | soulboy | I think its great news. They are welcome to each other. [Post edited 22 Jul 2017 21:13]
| | | |
Trialist on 23:53 - Jul 22 with 6847 views | dingdangblue |
Trialist on 20:39 - Jul 22 by Yorkshire_Dale | ........and we nursed/baby sat him through his shinsplits injury on loan last season, are we the NHS? |
I think his parent club Blackpool would have covered that bill. | |
| |
Trialist on 00:42 - Jul 23 with 6802 views | rochedale | How bizarre!! Have no idea of the ins and outs of this deal, but for me, this speaks volumes of the character of the player. Does this mean I can dislike him again? | |
| |
Trialist on 01:21 - Jul 23 with 6785 views | TVOS1907 |
Trialist on 20:39 - Jul 22 by Yorkshire_Dale | ........and we nursed/baby sat him through his shinsplits injury on loan last season, are we the NHS? |
AS DDB says, he was still contracted to Blackpool at the time. And if he wasn't, then I don't think he got the shin splints deliberately. | |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
Trialist on 09:23 - Jul 23 with 6533 views | nordenblue |
Trialist on 00:42 - Jul 23 by rochedale | How bizarre!! Have no idea of the ins and outs of this deal, but for me, this speaks volumes of the character of the player. Does this mean I can dislike him again? |
Strange from the outside,but if it came to a choice between signing him or Done there's no competition........ | | | |
Trialist on 10:47 - Jul 23 with 6362 views | D_Alien |
Trialist on 09:23 - Jul 23 by nordenblue | Strange from the outside,but if it came to a choice between signing him or Done there's no competition........ |
Yep, one's a tw@t, the other isn't | |
| |
| |