| One year deals 12:14 - Aug 5 with 1509 views | BisphamSeasider |
Whats the point of putting everyone on one year deals? If they have a good season they will just leave to another club for more money and then were in the same position again! |  | | |  |
| One year deals on 12:17 - Aug 5 with 1492 views | straightatthewall |
Control the risk. The only alternative to a one year deal is a 10 year deal. It's this way or potential financial meltdown for the Oyston fami...I mean the football club. |  |
| We got Bogdanovic, Oyston got very rich |
| |
| One year deals on 12:17 - Aug 5 with 1492 views | Old_Laytonian |
short-termism:
concentration on short-term projects or objectives for immediate profit at the expense of long-term security.
Think that explains it |  | | |
| One year deals on 12:23 - Aug 5 with 1456 views | Hannibal_de_Seaside |
I think it's a feature of the lateness of the decision making and lack of time to plan properly. If Riga really knew he wanted these players on a long term basis I reckon we would be on the usual 2+1 year basis, but he's had to pull in people without thorough research so a 1+1 is a probably holding measure. If after a few months he wants to keep them the contract can be renegotiated during the season.
Not ideal I know |  | | |
| One year deals on 12:28 - Aug 5 with 1443 views | straightatthewall |
| One year deals on 12:23 - Aug 5 by Hannibal_de_Seaside |
I think it's a feature of the lateness of the decision making and lack of time to plan properly. If Riga really knew he wanted these players on a long term basis I reckon we would be on the usual 2+1 year basis, but he's had to pull in people without thorough research so a 1+1 is a probably holding measure. If after a few months he wants to keep them the contract can be renegotiated during the season.
Not ideal I know |
Hanners,
I agree with the logic, but do you really think a deal will be renegotiated mid-season? | |
| We got Bogdanovic, Oyston got very rich |
| |
| One year deals on 12:28 - Aug 5 with 1438 views | Trashcan_Man |
| One year deals on 12:23 - Aug 5 by Hannibal_de_Seaside |
I think it's a feature of the lateness of the decision making and lack of time to plan properly. If Riga really knew he wanted these players on a long term basis I reckon we would be on the usual 2+1 year basis, but he's had to pull in people without thorough research so a 1+1 is a probably holding measure. If after a few months he wants to keep them the contract can be renegotiated during the season.
Not ideal I know |
Have we ever, in the Karl era, renegotiated a contract partway through a season, apart from Tom Ince?
I noticed Rovers added another couple of years to Jordan Rhodes' deal well before it was up. Don't recall us ever having the foresight to do the same - it was obvious Tom was going so I don't think that counts - KO was just after the comp money. |  | | |
| One year deals on 12:28 - Aug 5 with 1438 views | Seasider91 |
| One year deals on 12:23 - Aug 5 by Hannibal_de_Seaside |
I think it's a feature of the lateness of the decision making and lack of time to plan properly. If Riga really knew he wanted these players on a long term basis I reckon we would be on the usual 2+1 year basis, but he's had to pull in people without thorough research so a 1+1 is a probably holding measure. If after a few months he wants to keep them the contract can be renegotiated during the season.
Not ideal I know |
Not ideal but it does protect the club from having shite players on the books for several seasons |  |
| "We shall take baby steps up the league" Ian Holloway in July 2009 |
| |
| One year deals on 12:30 - Aug 5 with 1426 views | tangerine77 |
| One year deals on 12:28 - Aug 5 by straightatthewall |
Hanners,
I agree with the logic, but do you really think a deal will be renegotiated mid-season? |
There 2 year contracts in the clubs favour, if there shit we get rid after 1 year but if there decent we take the option of another year. | | | |
| One year deals on 12:35 - Aug 5 with 1400 views | Southshorepool |
They do have one year options in the clubs favour. Agree though in that it can be limiting.
I notice we're not the only club doing this. The last two signings at Ipswich were also one plus one yr option. | |
| Mainstream music is sh!t! |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| One year deals on 12:37 - Aug 5 with 1386 views | Lytham_FY8 |
That's all we offer though, other clubs offer more, just another reason to miss out on players we want, along with the training ground, wages, general air of incompetence around the gaff etc..... |  |
| "The money has not been taken out of the football club to pay for this hotel, but the money will be borrowed to build the hotel in part or whole"
|
| |
| One year deals on 12:37 - Aug 5 with 1380 views | Forever_Tangerine |
| One year deals on 12:35 - Aug 5 by Southshorepool |
They do have one year options in the clubs favour. Agree though in that it can be limiting.
I notice we're not the only club doing this. The last two signings at Ipswich were also one plus one yr option. |
They can be handy but I don't know why Karl hasn't given player like Oriol a 3 year contract as we all know he's quality and if he does do well after 2 years he will be gone anyway. |  | | |
| One year deals on 12:39 - Aug 5 with 1377 views | Seasider91 |
Exactly Tangerine 77, I would rather see us have 1 years worth of wasted wages than 2 years. Take Steve Davis as a prime example of this. | |
| "We shall take baby steps up the league" Ian Holloway in July 2009 |
| |
| One year deals on 12:46 - Aug 5 with 1349 views | tangerine77 |
| One year deals on 12:39 - Aug 5 by Seasider91 |
Exactly Tangerine 77, I would rather see us have 1 years worth of wasted wages than 2 years. Take Steve Davis as a prime example of this. |
There is nothing wrong with the 1 + 1 deals, if you are paying big transfer fees then you want to protect your asset with a longer deal. We don't and take chances on out of contract players with no transfer value so a 1 + 1 deal suits us. [Post edited 5 Aug 2014 12:50]
| | | |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 13:24 - Aug 5 with 1306 views | bollieboy |
| One year deals on 12:46 - Aug 5 by tangerine77 |
There is nothing wrong with the 1 + 1 deals, if you are paying big transfer fees then you want to protect your asset with a longer deal. We don't and take chances on out of contract players with no transfer value so a 1 + 1 deal suits us. [Post edited 5 Aug 2014 12:50]
|
| | | |
| One year deals on 13:24 - Aug 5 with 1306 views | bollieboy |
| One year deals on 12:46 - Aug 5 by tangerine77 |
There is nothing wrong with the 1 + 1 deals, if you are paying big transfer fees then you want to protect your asset with a longer deal. We don't and take chances on out of contract players with no transfer value so a 1 + 1 deal suits us. [Post edited 5 Aug 2014 12:50]
|
Last parachute payment this year. Give a year option so that KO can instigate if there is a chance of a fee. | | | |
| One year deals on 13:27 - Aug 5 with 1297 views | leeoggy |
| One year deals on 13:24 - Aug 5 by bollieboy |
Last parachute payment this year. Give a year option so that KO can instigate if there is a chance of a fee. |
exit strategy maybe? |  |
| |
| One year deals on 13:38 - Aug 5 with 1284 views | Hannibal_de_Seaside |
| One year deals on 12:28 - Aug 5 by straightatthewall |
Hanners,
I agree with the logic, but do you really think a deal will be renegotiated mid-season? |
In the past we haven't operated on the 1+1 basis, so Riga might prefer to work this way in the short term. I don't see why renegotiations won't take place during the season - perhaps with extensions added after the January window. New manager, perhaps a new way of working in the short term? Who knows. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
