By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
We probably would have lost anyway but having watched their second goal 3-4 times Ladapo is at least 4-6 feet offside when the ball is played. He's miles off but as with his first his second is very well taken. Good finisher but the lino has to see that.
Tonight's lowlights on 21:32 - Apr 13 by Superhoop83
Ladapo was onside. Barbet played him on.
No he wasn't. Look at it again. Barbet is at least 4 feet in front of him at the moment the ball is played. Actually when the ball is played. VAR would have had that one in a nanosecond.
No he wasn't. Look at it again. Barbet is at least 4 feet in front of him at the moment the ball is played. Actually when the ball is played. VAR would have had that one in a nanosecond.
He looks miles offside once he's away but he was in line with Barbet when the ball was played if the lines in the grass are straight. Maybe VAR would have shown Ladapo slightly ahead but it looks like a fair call to me.
Suffering since 1978.
1
Tonight's lowlights on 21:54 - Apr 13 with 2112 views
fully deserved to lose that one, once we scored kept giving the ball away and got far too relaxed. Once they got to 1-1 we just got worse, really poor and felt senior players let the younger ones down a bit especially at the back
Thought Niko was really poor though, offered nothing going forward and really weak defensively
1
Tonight's lowlights on 23:01 - Apr 13 with 1927 views
No he wasn't. Look at it again. Barbet is at least 4 feet in front of him at the moment the ball is played. Actually when the ball is played. VAR would have had that one in a nanosecond.
sorry Bosh, siding with the other guy on this. Managed to pause just after the ball is played and he's onside. Poor from Barbet.
Bare bones.
0
Tonight's lowlights on 11:28 - Apr 14 with 1581 views
While we are on officiating, I wasn't overly impressed with ref.
He WAS consistent within the game, something I'm always banging on about, but just felt he let a lot go he shouldn't have. Both sides, we seemed to get away with 3 or 4 , to me at least obvious fouls early on and then in the 2nd half position seemed to reverse.
Fans love to say I didn't notice the ref so must have had a good game, but I could go out there, run around and give nothing all night, that doesn't equal good game to me!
Should have cautioned Bonne and their player for that set to, and Bonne lucky he didn't connect with that kick, or we would be looking at another 3 game ban.
0
Tonight's lowlights on 17:33 - Apr 14 with 1398 views
No he wasn't. Look at it again. Barbet is at least 4 feet in front of him at the moment the ball is played. Actually when the ball is played. VAR would have had that one in a nanosecond.
I live near Stockley Park. Shall I go over there and pull the plug out round the back?
Motty coat.
[Post edited 14 Apr 2021 17:58]
0
Tonight's lowlights on 19:41 - Apr 14 with 1310 views
Tonight's lowlights on 15:15 - Apr 14 by PinnerPaul
While we are on officiating, I wasn't overly impressed with ref.
He WAS consistent within the game, something I'm always banging on about, but just felt he let a lot go he shouldn't have. Both sides, we seemed to get away with 3 or 4 , to me at least obvious fouls early on and then in the 2nd half position seemed to reverse.
Fans love to say I didn't notice the ref so must have had a good game, but I could go out there, run around and give nothing all night, that doesn't equal good game to me!
Should have cautioned Bonne and their player for that set to, and Bonne lucky he didn't connect with that kick, or we would be looking at another 3 game ban.
Bonne off target you say...
0
Tonight's lowlights on 19:56 - Apr 14 with 1297 views
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
