To clarify to date 19:30 - Jan 2 with 17009 views | KeithHaynes | There so much nonsense about we put this on Twitter. And for everyone you will only remain as conversant as possible by reading everything š Impossible we know. Plenty of people looking to trip up websites who report from the evidence available. All anonymous and all faceless šš«£ Mind you thanks for the clicks.
This post has been edited by an administrator | |
| | |
To clarify to date on 20:45 - Jan 2 with 2517 views | Witneyjack |
To clarify to date on 20:11 - Jan 2 by vetchonian | it's easy for some too though. People reading this forum will see the "owner" of the forum who himself has written articles on this subject stating the site has close contacts within the club and the new investor group make such statements and take it as given. It could be counted as irresponsible as Lukes comments re the situation |
You'll be leading the call for Russ's return along with OHL won't you if Luke leaves? | | | |
To clarify to date on 20:49 - Jan 2 with 2454 views | vetchonian |
To clarify to date on 20:45 - Jan 2 by Witneyjack | You'll be leading the call for Russ's return along with OHL won't you if Luke leaves? |
The BBR campaign us already underway.....there is a reason Russy turned down West Brom.... | |
| |
To clarify to date on 20:52 - Jan 2 with 2430 views | Witneyjack |
To clarify to date on 20:49 - Jan 2 by vetchonian | The BBR campaign us already underway.....there is a reason Russy turned down West Brom.... |
| | | |
To clarify to date on 21:20 - Jan 2 with 2255 views | KeithHaynes |
To clarify to date on 20:11 - Jan 2 by vetchonian | it's easy for some too though. People reading this forum will see the "owner" of the forum who himself has written articles on this subject stating the site has close contacts within the club and the new investor group make such statements and take it as given. It could be counted as irresponsible as Lukes comments re the situation |
I stand by that btw. And we do have many close contacts. And we work with them very confidentially, some Iāve known for over thirty years. There is nothing that they donāt know on the Swans. We donāt claim anything what we state and I state I stand by, in name on any platform and in any writing I do. Otherwise you wouldnāt have known the new investors three weeks or more before they were announced. Or Ben Cabango signing his new contract or Tyler Morse joining the club before anyone else mentioned it. Ken Gude the same. The list is endless but I donāt have to answer daily if people think we are wrong. Darts now.
This post has been edited by an administrator | |
| |
To clarify to date on 21:26 - Jan 2 with 2209 views | vetchonian |
To clarify to date on 21:20 - Jan 2 by KeithHaynes | I stand by that btw. And we do have many close contacts. And we work with them very confidentially, some Iāve known for over thirty years. There is nothing that they donāt know on the Swans. We donāt claim anything what we state and I state I stand by, in name on any platform and in any writing I do. Otherwise you wouldnāt have known the new investors three weeks or more before they were announced. Or Ben Cabango signing his new contract or Tyler Morse joining the club before anyone else mentioned it. Ken Gude the same. The list is endless but I donāt have to answer daily if people think we are wrong. Darts now.
This post has been edited by an administrator |
but you can see Keith how then if you express a personal opinion based on "hearsay" some may take it as actual fact? It maybe tomorrow all will become clear but your "personal" opinion can set the X hares racing especially when the Indy has recently been ahead if the game with things like the ownership change and Cabangos signing | |
| |
To clarify to date on 21:35 - Jan 2 with 2145 views | KeithHaynes |
To clarify to date on 21:26 - Jan 2 by vetchonian | but you can see Keith how then if you express a personal opinion based on "hearsay" some may take it as actual fact? It maybe tomorrow all will become clear but your "personal" opinion can set the X hares racing especially when the Indy has recently been ahead if the game with things like the ownership change and Cabangos signing |
I donāt see it as heresay. Itās nothing to do with the WBA nonsense either. Iām pretty certain we didnāt ever say he was going. | |
| |
To clarify to date on 21:44 - Jan 2 with 2066 views | vetchonian |
To clarify to date on 21:35 - Jan 2 by KeithHaynes | I donāt see it as heresay. Itās nothing to do with the WBA nonsense either. Iām pretty certain we didnāt ever say he was going. |
Luke has gone or nearly gone. Your words Keith from your post earlier in reply to Union Jack . All I was doing g Keith was trying to explain how the X hares were racing and you needed to make that post you have in the OP. You guys are always.in the mark given your contacts ... [Post edited 2 Jan 21:46]
| |
| |
To clarify to date on 21:49 - Jan 2 with 2005 views | Fireboy2 |
To clarify to date on 20:49 - Jan 2 by vetchonian | The BBR campaign us already underway.....there is a reason Russy turned down West Brom.... |
Yeah because he wants to cone back š | | | | Login to get fewer ads
To clarify to date on 21:50 - Jan 2 with 1989 views | Whiterockin | Steven Schumacher just moved to 6/1 second favourite. | | | |
To clarify to date on 21:55 - Jan 2 with 1923 views | vetchonian |
To clarify to date on 21:49 - Jan 2 by Fireboy2 | Yeah because he wants to cone back š |
in 1 | |
| |
To clarify to date on 22:23 - Jan 2 with 1786 views | KeithHaynes |
To clarify to date on 21:44 - Jan 2 by vetchonian | Luke has gone or nearly gone. Your words Keith from your post earlier in reply to Union Jack . All I was doing g Keith was trying to explain how the X hares were racing and you needed to make that post you have in the OP. You guys are always.in the mark given your contacts ... [Post edited 2 Jan 21:46]
|
Listen, if I get my pants pulled down so be it. I stand by it, this has not gone well for Luke behind the scenes. His position is untenable for me. I canāt say anymore.
This post has been edited by an administrator | |
| |
To clarify to date on 22:31 - Jan 2 with 1732 views | Whiterockin |
To clarify to date on 22:23 - Jan 2 by KeithHaynes | Listen, if I get my pants pulled down so be it. I stand by it, this has not gone well for Luke behind the scenes. His position is untenable for me. I canāt say anymore.
This post has been edited by an administrator |
If he is still in place on Saturday I really think it will be a "Bradley out" moment with the crowd. He has done nothing to quell the rumours and deserves what he gets. Supporters don't like getting played for fools. | | | |
To clarify to date on 22:57 - Jan 2 with 1594 views | KeithHaynes |
To clarify to date on 19:33 - Jan 2 by Whiterockin | 38,000 views. Tidy. |
50k | |
| |
To clarify to date on 22:58 - Jan 2 with 1587 views | vetchonian |
To clarify to date on 22:23 - Jan 2 by KeithHaynes | Listen, if I get my pants pulled down so be it. I stand by it, this has not gone well for Luke behind the scenes. His position is untenable for me. I canāt say anymore.
This post has been edited by an administrator |
No probs Keith....no drama meant.... | |
| |
To clarify to date on 23:12 - Jan 2 with 1508 views | onehunglow |
To clarify to date on 20:45 - Jan 2 by Witneyjack | You'll be leading the call for Russ's return along with OHL won't you if Luke leaves? |
OHL has gone for a lie down after reading that Good t see you on here Hope you're enjoying retirement matey | |
| |
To clarify to date on 23:17 - Jan 2 with 1490 views | sw02sea |
To clarify to date on 22:23 - Jan 2 by KeithHaynes | Listen, if I get my pants pulled down so be it. I stand by it, this has not gone well for Luke behind the scenes. His position is untenable for me. I canāt say anymore.
This post has been edited by an administrator |
I think 100% the same. Heās toast | | | |
To clarify to date on 09:09 - Jan 3 with 1030 views | Landore_Jack |
To clarify to date on 22:23 - Jan 2 by KeithHaynes | Listen, if I get my pants pulled down so be it. I stand by it, this has not gone well for Luke behind the scenes. His position is untenable for me. I canāt say anymore.
This post has been edited by an administrator |
I have read a few posts on here saying the new owners wanted a new manager before the speculation with WBA started. Is there any truth in this? | |
| |
To clarify to date on 09:11 - Jan 3 with 1012 views | union_jack |
To clarify to date on 09:09 - Jan 3 by Landore_Jack | I have read a few posts on here saying the new owners wanted a new manager before the speculation with WBA started. Is there any truth in this? |
If true, and I can see reasons for it being so, then itās a win-win situation should he go. Can we be that lucky again?? | |
| |
To clarify to date on 09:58 - Jan 3 with 847 views | vetchonian |
To clarify to date on 09:09 - Jan 3 by Landore_Jack | I have read a few posts on here saying the new owners wanted a new manager before the speculation with WBA started. Is there any truth in this? |
it's true it has mentioned in a few news items on here. Maybe Luke naively believed he could use the West Brom situation to strengthen his position....maybe make the board put up or shut up? Maybe the original interview has been misrepresented....with the sequence of answers adjusted. ThWhat is crazy that no statements from either the club or Williams clarifying the situation and further "hunts" following the Portsmouth debacle. It's now a mess of mammoth proportions especially with bus facing the same said West Brom tomorrow There is fault with both Williams and the club for this mess.....and surely it could / should have been put to bed by now | |
| |
To clarify to date on 09:59 - Jan 3 with 844 views | Landore_Jack | "There's a growing feeling inside Swansea that Williams will now stay at the club, although some sections of the club's hierarchy are believed to be a little concerned at the head coach's handling of the saga." "As too are supporters, many of whom have been disappointed by Williams' failure to publicly commit to the club and put the speculation to bed." https://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/luke-williams-holds-t [Post edited 3 Jan 9:59]
| |
| |
To clarify to date on 10:02 - Jan 3 with 809 views | jack247 |
To clarify to date on 09:59 - Jan 3 by Landore_Jack | "There's a growing feeling inside Swansea that Williams will now stay at the club, although some sections of the club's hierarchy are believed to be a little concerned at the head coach's handling of the saga." "As too are supporters, many of whom have been disappointed by Williams' failure to publicly commit to the club and put the speculation to bed." https://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/luke-williams-holds-t [Post edited 3 Jan 9:59]
|
Well if Harry Darling was on the verge of signing and now heās not, itās not just the clubs hierarchy and the supporters feeling demoralised by itā¦ | | | |
To clarify to date on 10:05 - Jan 3 with 772 views | union_jack | Iām a firm believer that there is never smoke without fire especially in this case. If as is being reported he is no longer in the frame I do believe he was and maybe a host of things e.g. the way heās handled it displaying a lack of loyalty or the capitulation by the team on Saturday that have changed WBA)s minds. Of course the smoke may be accompanied by mirrors in this case so who the hell really knowsš Iām still living with some hopeš¤š | |
| |
To clarify to date on 10:13 - Jan 3 with 707 views | jack247 |
To clarify to date on 10:05 - Jan 3 by union_jack | Iām a firm believer that there is never smoke without fire especially in this case. If as is being reported he is no longer in the frame I do believe he was and maybe a host of things e.g. the way heās handled it displaying a lack of loyalty or the capitulation by the team on Saturday that have changed WBA)s minds. Of course the smoke may be accompanied by mirrors in this case so who the hell really knowsš Iām still living with some hopeš¤š |
Or if West Brom do actually want him, which he had obviously been lead to believe, why offer us Ā£1.8m when they can just sit back and watch this unfold. He may be available for free before long | | | |
To clarify to date on 10:20 - Jan 3 with 649 views | vetchonian |
To clarify to date on 10:13 - Jan 3 by jack247 | Or if West Brom do actually want him, which he had obviously been lead to believe, why offer us Ā£1.8m when they can just sit back and watch this unfold. He may be available for free before long |
this just goes to prove you can't always believe what you read on line who made the statement re the 1.8M? No official statement from West Brom just another journo close to them saying Williams not in the frame. The only ones who really know are Williams his agent and West Brom.....and maybe Coleman? What worries me is we have a game against them tomorrow and no clarity from the club whether Luke is preparing us with the methods the players don't like apparently or if Williams us staying just mire media speculation. | |
| |
To clarify to date on 10:21 - Jan 3 with 645 views | union_jack |
To clarify to date on 10:13 - Jan 3 by jack247 | Or if West Brom do actually want him, which he had obviously been lead to believe, why offer us Ā£1.8m when they can just sit back and watch this unfold. He may be available for free before long |
Indeed, especially as thereās a 2 week gap before the next league game after tomorrow. Who blinks first? Iām slowly resigning myself to the fact heās going to be here a bit longer and wonāt go to WBA. What do the club do then is the big question. | |
| |
| |