By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Audited Accounts - Whose interpretation do you believe? on 21:09 - Mar 18 by londonlisa2001
No it's not. And the whole point of the discussion was analysing the financial statements,
You were the one that created the thread. And based a whole lot of "we're doomed' nonsense around it.
Out of interest, how do you arrive at the £60m on players since the balance sheet date. What numbers are you using for the players we have bought? I don't mean the source. I mean the numbers.
Audited Accounts - Whose interpretation do you believe? on 01:28 - Mar 19 by E20Jack
What on earth are you wibbling on about you massive aching simpleton?
They said they have now completed their initial discussions with their council that works closely with such subjects as UP. After these discussions it is not clear whether they would have a successful UP case.
So again, nothing has changed. It is still unclear whether we have s successful UP case. I am guessing you put your hand up to do the donkey work rather than how you like to portray it as - which is coming up with the whole notion and angle of UP (the most obvious go to case when shareholders have been...you know...unfairly prejudiced).
For the fifth time, are you telling us you believe that The Trust being unfairly prejudiced is a particularly obscure and difficult to work out scenario?
I just want to know how much is self created delusion and how much is sheer incompetency. It could be a rather unhealthy dollop of both of course, which is more than likely at this stage.
[Post edited 19 Mar 2018 3:05]
Just to be clear you are a troll, Dim, and everybody knows it.
You have no interest whatsover in messsageboard discussion for the purposes of gaining or sharing knowledge, or reaching a better understanding.
As regards me your sole interest is in smearing me and twisting what I say and anything else you can come up with for that purpose.
You are beneath contempt. A worthless piece of shit.
Neverhtleess sometimes I feel the inclination to play with you. Not today though.
Audited Accounts - Whose interpretation do you believe? on 10:08 - Mar 19 by Shaky
Just to be clear you are a troll, Dim, and everybody knows it.
You have no interest whatsover in messsageboard discussion for the purposes of gaining or sharing knowledge, or reaching a better understanding.
As regards me your sole interest is in smearing me and twisting what I say and anything else you can come up with for that purpose.
You are beneath contempt. A worthless piece of shit.
Neverhtleess sometimes I feel the inclination to play with you. Not today though.
There you go again fantasy Shakes... "everyone". By everyone you mean you, and not even that is true as we both know you are simply lashing out due to me exposing you time and again.
There is no discussion to be had here Shakes. It is a good old fashion expose of your utter lunacy. You on the other hand had the option to enter into a discussion with Lisa who was teaching you the errors of your book based ways... you ended up telling her she was a "f@cking cow" - that was after calling me all the names under the sun and spreading your wild lies about myself and others. So Shaky - which one sounds like the troll?
What you don't like is that someone has the ability to make you look an utter cretin and won't back down. It threatens you and whatever persona you have built in your head.
If I was a fantasist Danish liar I would say "projection much?"
Now then, stop avoiding the question. 6th time. Do you feel the fact that the Trust have been unfairly prejudiced is a particularly obscure and difficult concept then?
Audited Accounts - Whose interpretation do you believe? on 10:18 - Mar 19 by E20Jack
There you go again fantasy Shakes... "everyone". By everyone you mean you, and not even that is true as we both know you are simply lashing out due to me exposing you time and again.
There is no discussion to be had here Shakes. It is a good old fashion expose of your utter lunacy. You on the other hand had the option to enter into a discussion with Lisa who was teaching you the errors of your book based ways... you ended up telling her she was a "f@cking cow" - that was after calling me all the names under the sun and spreading your wild lies about myself and others. So Shaky - which one sounds like the troll?
What you don't like is that someone has the ability to make you look an utter cretin and won't back down. It threatens you and whatever persona you have built in your head.
If I was a fantasist Danish liar I would say "projection much?"
Now then, stop avoiding the question. 6th time. Do you feel the fact that the Trust have been unfairly prejudiced is a particularly obscure and difficult concept then?
Audited Accounts - Whose interpretation do you believe? on 03:44 - Mar 19 by Highjack
So who was right?
Myself and Lisa so far.
Lisa on the financial analysis and myself on the psycho analysis and expose of the strangest man we have ever had post on our clubs forum and his wild fantasies and exaggerations.
Audited Accounts - Whose interpretation do you believe? on 10:48 - Mar 19 by Shaky
All I know is the numbers i used for '17 from the same source were within 10% of the actuals.
And that is a verifiable fact.
The notes to the financial statements show that the total of player registrations including contract renegotiations intermediary fees etc etc after the balance sheet date was £28.7m.
The only player we signed between then (date the accounts were signed) and now is Andre Ayew.
0
Audited Accounts - Whose interpretation do you believe? on 11:23 - Mar 19 with 1315 views
Audited Accounts - Whose interpretation do you believe? on 12:26 - Mar 19 by Shaky
What it it about the term fcuk off you don't understand?
Is it cos I'm black? Or Danish?
What it it? Is this a forum stammer or just more rubbish that comes from your incredibly odd fingers? If you are asking why I am not going away after you command so, that is probably because you have hoisted yourself by your own petard. (Google it)
Is what because you are black and Danish? The fact you are a fantasist psychopath? No I doubt such things hold prejudices... no pun intended.
Audited Accounts - Whose interpretation do you believe? on 13:21 - Mar 19 by Shaky
But I consider you stupid, Dim, whereas you have categorically stated at least 50 times that I am Danish. It is supposed to be a slur, right?
And now you are actually asking me about it? This is all very strange.
You are confusing yourself.
Why do you believe being Danish is a slur? You appeared to deny it above or allude to the fact I am incorrect. I am not asking you about it, I am looking for you to confirm or deny your apparent revelation.
You also consider yourself to be a financial expert, so forgive me if I take your considerations with a healthy dollop of salt.
Audited Accounts - Whose interpretation do you believe? on 16:21 - Mar 19 by monmouth
Denmark?
Lol.
I asked because one of my first boyfriends was from Aarhus. Mads his name was.
It occurred to me that he may have been so smitten that years later he decided to support the hometown team of his young sweetheart and became Shaky :-)
Not really - the last bit I mean. That would be terrifying...
0
Audited Accounts - Whose interpretation do you believe? on 16:44 - Mar 19 with 1169 views
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
