| Over to you Box Office 21:21 - Dec 18 with 28499 views | Darran |
lol
This post has been edited by an administrator |  |
| |  |
| Over to you Box Office on 22:13 - Dec 19 with 3714 views | LeonWasGod |
| Over to you Box Office on 20:44 - Dec 19 by E20Jack |
A tedious correct pr ick - which is all important.
Thanks for your continued interest. |
You're very funny.
Fact: He is a £45m player, because someone paid that for him.
Your opinion: he isn't worth it. That's fair enough, you can think that, but it doesn't make you any more "correct" or incorrect than Trampie (or anyone else) thinking he *is* worth that. It is silly money. But whether he's worth it or not in the current market is just a viewpoint that's hard to prove.
I tell you what though - I'd rather pay £45m for someone who's ever-present and had started to have an impact, than £16m for someone who looks crap and can't get off the bench. Everton seem to have had the better outcome from summer business.
Can't believe this is still going on  |  | | |
| Over to you Box Office on 22:16 - Dec 19 with 3708 views | E20Jack |
| Over to you Box Office on 22:13 - Dec 19 by LeonWasGod |
You're very funny.
Fact: He is a £45m player, because someone paid that for him.
Your opinion: he isn't worth it. That's fair enough, you can think that, but it doesn't make you any more "correct" or incorrect than Trampie (or anyone else) thinking he *is* worth that. It is silly money. But whether he's worth it or not in the current market is just a viewpoint that's hard to prove.
I tell you what though - I'd rather pay £45m for someone who's ever-present and had started to have an impact, than £16m for someone who looks crap and can't get off the bench. Everton seem to have had the better outcome from summer business.
Can't believe this is still going on |
Someone paid £25m for Wilfried Bony too. He isnt a £25m player either. |  |
| |
| Over to you Box Office on 22:19 - Dec 19 with 3691 views | E20Jack |
| Over to you Box Office on 21:56 - Dec 19 by Brynmill_Jack |
He's right though. It's an idiots point. |
Hence why an idiot made it  | |
| |
| Over to you Box Office on 22:35 - Dec 19 with 3654 views | Brynmill_Jack |
| Over to you Box Office on 22:19 - Dec 19 by E20Jack |
Hence why an idiot made it |
Darran should just stick to "look at me in my Bentley" posts. Football debate is a bridge too far for him |  |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| Over to you Box Office on 23:00 - Dec 19 with 3619 views | LeonWasGod |
| Over to you Box Office on 22:16 - Dec 19 by E20Jack |
Someone paid £25m for Wilfried Bony too. He isnt a £25m player either. |
And seeing how that deal panned out, I'd agree. If Siggy has a season for Everton like he did for us last year they'll probably be happy. | | | |
| Over to you Box Office on 00:01 - Dec 20 with 3585 views | E20Jack |
| Over to you Box Office on 23:00 - Dec 19 by LeonWasGod |
And seeing how that deal panned out, I'd agree. If Siggy has a season for Everton like he did for us last year they'll probably be happy. |
They wont, as the team isnt focussed to go through one player, which is why we have had comments that he is their most hated player etc
But he is capable of the odd cracker as we saw.
Very similar sort of thing to Adel Taraabt when he was at QPR, they made him the main man. As soon as he left he was average. | |
| |
| Over to you Box Office on 00:08 - Dec 20 with 3575 views | Drizzy |
LeonWasGod do yourself a favour mate and stop replying. This guy's an absolute nutcase who talks in circles. I made the same mistake on a different thread last week. Hours wasted trying to have a reasoned discussion. |  |
| |
| Over to you Box Office on 00:17 - Dec 20 with 3558 views | E20Jack |
| Over to you Box Office on 00:08 - Dec 20 by Drizzy |
LeonWasGod do yourself a favour mate and stop replying. This guy's an absolute nutcase who talks in circles. I made the same mistake on a different thread last week. Hours wasted trying to have a reasoned discussion. |
A reasoned discussion is certain,y not what you contributed Drizzy, you were entertaining though | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Over to you Box Office on 00:17 - Dec 20 with 3559 views | costalotta |
| Over to you Box Office on 00:08 - Dec 20 by Drizzy |
LeonWasGod do yourself a favour mate and stop replying. This guy's an absolute nutcase who talks in circles. I made the same mistake on a different thread last week. Hours wasted trying to have a reasoned discussion. |
I concur.
He's a fool who who stupidly doesn't know when to stop. That's why he's a fool. Toys will be incoming ... |  | | |
| Over to you Box Office on 00:21 - Dec 20 with 3552 views | Darran |
| Over to you Box Office on 00:17 - Dec 20 by costalotta |
I concur.
He's a fool who who stupidly doesn't know when to stop. That's why he's a fool. Toys will be incoming ... |
I concur too the most boring prick on here by a country mile. | |
| |
| Over to you Box Office on 01:03 - Dec 20 with 3522 views | E20Jack |
Some awfully bitter people on here when they try to be clever and instantly realise they aren't  | |
| |
| Over to you Box Office on 05:41 - Dec 20 with 3475 views | Shonky |
| Over to you Box Office on 22:16 - Dec 19 by E20Jack |
Someone paid £25m for Wilfried Bony too. He isnt a £25m player either. |
Yes but he was.
Mo Salah cost Chelsea however much and he was terrible buy. He cost Liverpool considerably more, inflation allowing, and was a great buy. His value was appears to have been dependant on his performances after he arrived. Its the same player. Liverpool have payed more for the same product and got better value.
A players cost is fixed by each transaction, his value, variable.
Seeing as you are such an expert you can detail exactly how a players value is deduced, and how that relates to any costs payed etc. [Post edited 20 Dec 2017 8:06]
|  |
| |
| Over to you Box Office on 07:12 - Dec 20 with 3438 views | Shonky |
| Over to you Box Office on 05:41 - Dec 20 by Shonky |
Yes but he was.
Mo Salah cost Chelsea however much and he was terrible buy. He cost Liverpool considerably more, inflation allowing, and was a great buy. His value was appears to have been dependant on his performances after he arrived. Its the same player. Liverpool have payed more for the same product and got better value.
A players cost is fixed by each transaction, his value, variable.
Seeing as you are such an expert you can detail exactly how a players value is deduced, and how that relates to any costs payed etc. [Post edited 20 Dec 2017 8:06]
|
http://www.humancond.org/analysis/economics/price_vs_worth_vs_value | |
| |
| Over to you Box Office on 07:27 - Dec 20 with 3415 views | nantywatcher |
| Over to you Box Office on 05:41 - Dec 20 by Shonky |
Yes but he was.
Mo Salah cost Chelsea however much and he was terrible buy. He cost Liverpool considerably more, inflation allowing, and was a great buy. His value was appears to have been dependant on his performances after he arrived. Its the same player. Liverpool have payed more for the same product and got better value.
A players cost is fixed by each transaction, his value, variable.
Seeing as you are such an expert you can detail exactly how a players value is deduced, and how that relates to any costs payed etc. [Post edited 20 Dec 2017 8:06]
|
Great post. Same with Clucas, undoubtedly a good player, just arrived at the wrong club at the wrong time. |  | | |
| Over to you Box Office on 09:19 - Dec 20 with 3361 views | whoflungdung |
Back on subject,
Interesting t hear talks port saying Clucas really wasn't that bad and had a great engine ( no Bentley reference )
It might be another case of clement ruining players | |
| |
| Over to you Box Office on 09:31 - Dec 20 with 3347 views | swancity |
| Over to you Box Office on 07:27 - Dec 20 by nantywatcher |
Great post. Same with Clucas, undoubtedly a good player, just arrived at the wrong club at the wrong time. |
He's certainly a 'good' player, just not good enough to be a Premier League player. Looks like a decent enough Championship player to me, sadly like so many of our first team squad at present. | |
| Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day |
| |
| Over to you Box Office on 09:43 - Dec 20 with 3332 views | E20Jack |
| Over to you Box Office on 05:41 - Dec 20 by Shonky |
Yes but he was.
Mo Salah cost Chelsea however much and he was terrible buy. He cost Liverpool considerably more, inflation allowing, and was a great buy. His value was appears to have been dependant on his performances after he arrived. Its the same player. Liverpool have payed more for the same product and got better value.
A players cost is fixed by each transaction, his value, variable.
Seeing as you are such an expert you can detail exactly how a players value is deduced, and how that relates to any costs payed etc. [Post edited 20 Dec 2017 8:06]
|
Nope, the moment he signed he depreciated to true market value. Bony maybe so, I am certain that if man city relisted him the second he signed they would still receive £25m for him. Bad example by me there. But Gylfi is the perfect example.
He was sold for an exceptional price not market price, it seemed like only Everton thought he was worth that due to them offsetting it against a Champions League campaign (which they almost certainly won't get) they publicly said he could bring. If they relisted him the second he signed they would not get £45m. Probably closer to 25% less of that regardless of Leicester's apparent tentative interest. Hence they paid over market value and we had to sell. | |
| |
| Over to you Box Office on 10:00 - Dec 20 with 3301 views | pencoedjack |
I was probably Gylfi's biggest fan, 45 million pound was an excellent bit of business it is the utter garbage our DOF bought with (some of) that cash is the issue.
Fast flowing football was never coming with what we recruited, the lack of width in our side is fuking criminal. Dyer Routs & Nairsingh wouldn't get into any side in the top of half of the championship, Naughton has 1 thought when he gets the ball turn & send it backwards.
It was so obvious its criminal ..... Jenkins is a c unt |  | | |
| Over to you Box Office on 10:36 - Dec 20 with 3280 views | nantywatcher |
| Over to you Box Office on 10:00 - Dec 20 by pencoedjack |
I was probably Gylfi's biggest fan, 45 million pound was an excellent bit of business it is the utter garbage our DOF bought with (some of) that cash is the issue.
Fast flowing football was never coming with what we recruited, the lack of width in our side is fuking criminal. Dyer Routs & Nairsingh wouldn't get into any side in the top of half of the championship, Naughton has 1 thought when he gets the ball turn & send it backwards.
It was so obvious its criminal ..... Jenkins is a c unt |
Pity you did not watch the last 2 games, Naughton has been our most attack minded player both times, and Narsingh actually looked threatening against Everton. | | | |
| Over to you Box Office on 10:42 - Dec 20 with 3268 views | pencoedjack |
| Over to you Box Office on 10:36 - Dec 20 by nantywatcher |
Pity you did not watch the last 2 games, Naughton has been our most attack minded player both times, and Narsingh actually looked threatening against Everton. |
I did watch I think you are getting Naughton mixed up with Olsson.
I cannot believe someone would put 'Naughton' & 'attack minded' in the same sentence. | | | |
| Over to you Box Office on 20:01 - Dec 20 with 3144 views | trampie |
| Over to you Box Office on 09:43 - Dec 20 by E20Jack |
Nope, the moment he signed he depreciated to true market value. Bony maybe so, I am certain that if man city relisted him the second he signed they would still receive £25m for him. Bad example by me there. But Gylfi is the perfect example.
He was sold for an exceptional price not market price, it seemed like only Everton thought he was worth that due to them offsetting it against a Champions League campaign (which they almost certainly won't get) they publicly said he could bring. If they relisted him the second he signed they would not get £45m. Probably closer to 25% less of that regardless of Leicester's apparent tentative interest. Hence they paid over market value and we had to sell. |
The market value is what someone is prepared to pay and Everton reportedly paid £45M, therefore that is Gylfi's market value.
Leicester was reported to have been prepared to pay £40M which is close to 90% of what Everton was said to have paid, other teams might also had been prepared to pay £45M also but the talk was Gylfi wanted to go to the Toffees, ballboy for them back in the day and all that, so no point anyone else going in unless they were going to smash £45M and the wages.
Gylfi was a bona fide £45M player. |  |
| |
| Over to you Box Office on 20:17 - Dec 20 with 3133 views | awayjack |
| Over to you Box Office on 10:36 - Dec 20 by nantywatcher |
Pity you did not watch the last 2 games, Naughton has been our most attack minded player both times, and Narsingh actually looked threatening against Everton. |
Really? Thought both were terrible against Everton. Narsingh bear his man a couple do times but then shot into stand and made terrible pass. Good performance? |  | | |
| Over to you Box Office on 20:41 - Dec 20 with 3116 views | E20Jack |
| Over to you Box Office on 20:01 - Dec 20 by trampie |
The market value is what someone is prepared to pay and Everton reportedly paid £45M, therefore that is Gylfi's market value.
Leicester was reported to have been prepared to pay £40M which is close to 90% of what Everton was said to have paid, other teams might also had been prepared to pay £45M also but the talk was Gylfi wanted to go to the Toffees, ballboy for them back in the day and all that, so no point anyone else going in unless they were going to smash £45M and the wages.
Gylfi was a bona fide £45M player. |
They were a one off specialist buyer. He was not worth £45m and that was not his true market value. His true market value is what he would reach on the open market in general terms. Everton will not be able to get sell him for £45m as they were the only club who felt they would pay that. So he is not worth that. Maybe he was technically for a split second as the papers were in the process of being signed - immediately after he is no longer a £45m player. Which is why we got a great price. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
