 | Forum
Reply | I Cant See A Bony Return
at 21:20 20 Jul 2017
Really? Look at this picture very closely, then look again at the one above. Apparently there is an age difference of 42 yrs, and one has spent the last 9 years in prison instead of earning £100k a week at the very top of professional sport. No thanks.
 [Post edited 20 Jul 2017 21:21]
|
| Forum
Reply | Borja has gone
at 22:59 4 Jul 2017
Well, we'd best hope he makes an impact, because if he doesn't that's £15.5m down the shit chute. Good luck Borja (for our sake). [Post edited 4 Jul 2017 23:00]
|
| Forum
Reply | Fish Tank
at 22:12 4 Jul 2017
Take it to the skip Maz.  |
| Forum
Reply | Jenkins and Dineen
at 23:36 3 Jul 2017
Yes, they have opposed it, just nowhere near the degree that is acceptable to many of it's members. I for one urge that they reconsider their stance. If they don't i fear that the trust could end up as a committee holding coffee mornings once a month in a portakabin outside the Landore club. But hey, i'm sure you weren't banned for simply having an opposing view! I'm sure you must have taken things far more further than that?  |
| Forum
Reply | Jenkins and Dineen
at 22:00 3 Jul 2017
1) you can't just introduce conditions for an election in the same month as the election takes place. These things need to be discussed and perhaps voted on and there's no time now for a proper process.
What the actual fvck are you on about Dafydd? Who needs to discuus what? It's quite a simple request, and there is no proper process that needs to be in place or voted on for that to take place!
2) What's to stop everybody up for reelection just telling you that they oppose HJ and LD and then just carrying on as normal?
Firstly it's not about opposing HJ and LD. Every single one of the trust board have opposed what the sell outs have done otherwise this thread or any other related thread wouldn't exist. It's whether they approve that they remain in their positions that they currently occupy. That's a massive difference. |
| Forum
Reply | Interesting Trust Email
at 22:18 2 Jul 2017
No, it's a trust board fact. Or at least the view of the hierarchy within the trust board. |
| Forum
Reply | Interesting Trust Email
at 22:10 2 Jul 2017
Best to ignore that one is it Ux? Because i KNOW it to be true. |
| Forum
Reply | Interesting Trust Email
at 21:41 2 Jul 2017
Because no matter what he's done. The trust board still believe he is the best person to have as chairman of our club. |
| Forum
Reply | Interesting Trust Email
at 21:04 2 Jul 2017
I've come to the conclusion in my own mind after weighing things up, that the trust board do not wish for Huw Jenkins to be removed. |
| Forum
Reply | Thousands march against the tories
at 19:14 2 Jul 2017
You talking to me? As you quoted me but gave a reply that had nothing to do with my post. If you were, then wtf are you talking about? |
| Forum
Reply | Interesting Trust Email
at 01:01 2 Jul 2017
This is the offer that the Trust board have negotiated and agreed to put to the members. Shocked i am, like many others it seems, but there we are innit eh! |
| Forum
Reply | Interesting Trust Email
at 00:19 2 Jul 2017
Of course PS isn't representative of the entire fan base. There are thousands of fans who think Huw Jenkins is a footballing Messiah! But on issues such as this, most are clued up, and most read this site or aware of the views of posters who do. Don't be so complacent, or it may come back and smack you in the face. |
| Forum
Reply | Interesting Trust Email
at 23:44 1 Jul 2017
It doesn't surprise me Matt. Phil made a great statement on behalf of the trust board and that has to be respected, but under those circumstances i doubt very much whether anyone in the room would have stuck their hand up to the 'go legal' option. |
| | morningstar
|
Site Scores| Forum Votes: | 938 | | Comment Votes: | 0 | | Prediction League: | 0 | | TOTAL: | 938 |
|
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
