| Legal action it is then 16:25 - Aug 1 with 9393 views | Darran |
The Swansea City Supporters Trust Board can confirm the following results in the recent consultation to members:
A total of 1572 ballot papers were issued with 848 valid ballot papers returned.
The results were:
81.80% of votes in favour of Option 1 - To Pursue Legal Action
17.15% of votes in favour of Option 2 - No Change
(1.05% of votes were returned on spoiled ballot papers)
The result now provides the Swans Trust Board with a firm mandate to proceed with the legal avenues outlined in our consultation document and our legal team and funders will continue their work at the earliest possible opportunity.
We will of course duly update our members as we progress.
|  |
| |  |
| Legal action it is then on 20:30 - Aug 1 with 1566 views | waynekerr55 |
| Legal action it is then on 19:04 - Aug 1 by longlostjack |
Agree. Important to get the PR right in the media too. |
Word on the street is that someone is saying that more people.will be out of work [Post edited 1 Aug 2019 20:50]
|  |
| |
| Legal action it is then on 20:33 - Aug 1 with 1555 views | Oldjack |
Two years to late but better late than never, good luck |  |
| Prosser the Tosser dwells on Phil's bum hole like a rusty old hemorrhoid ,fact
You Greedy Bastards Get Out Of OUR Club!
|
| |
| Legal action it is then on 20:37 - Aug 1 with 1531 views | Nortbankboy |
What do we expect to gain by taking legal action.
Apart from distracting the club from the coming season? |  | | |
| Legal action it is then on 20:40 - Aug 1 with 1516 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Legal action it is then on 20:37 - Aug 1 by Nortbankboy |
What do we expect to gain by taking legal action.
Apart from distracting the club from the coming season? |
Genuine question.
How does this distract the club from the coming season?
Can you explain? | | | |
| Legal action it is then on 20:40 - Aug 1 with 1512 views | exiledclaseboy |
| Legal action it is then on 20:37 - Aug 1 by Nortbankboy |
What do we expect to gain by taking legal action.
Apart from distracting the club from the coming season? |
Who’s this “we” you speak of? |  |
| |
| Legal action it is then on 20:46 - Aug 1 with 1474 views | Nortbankboy |
| Legal action it is then on 20:40 - Aug 1 by londonlisa2001 |
Genuine question.
How does this distract the club from the coming season?
Can you explain? |
Well we are looking to replace mcbernie.
Would spend money on a replacement or keep
The money back in case they have pay compensation? | | | |
| Legal action it is then on 20:54 - Aug 1 with 1435 views | NeathJack |
| Legal action it is then on 20:46 - Aug 1 by Nortbankboy |
Well we are looking to replace mcbernie.
Would spend money on a replacement or keep
The money back in case they have pay compensation? |
This stooge should be banned. |  | | |
| Legal action it is then on 20:55 - Aug 1 with 1421 views | Nortbankboy |
| Legal action it is then on 20:54 - Aug 1 by NeathJack |
This stooge should be banned. |
Why neath jack? | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Legal action it is then on 20:58 - Aug 1 with 1405 views | NeathJack |
| Legal action it is then on 20:55 - Aug 1 by Nortbankboy |
Why neath jack? |
Because you are deliberately trying to muddy the waters by spreading a false impression that the club will pay for the legal case out of it's own coffers. | | | |
| Legal action it is then on 21:01 - Aug 1 with 1389 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Legal action it is then on 20:46 - Aug 1 by Nortbankboy |
Well we are looking to replace mcbernie.
Would spend money on a replacement or keep
The money back in case they have pay compensation? |
Well (a) we weren’t planning on spending the McBurnie money anyway (according to Cooper and Birch) and (b) the owners and past owners and the club are not fungible. [Post edited 1 Aug 2019 21:02]
| | | |
| Legal action it is then on 21:02 - Aug 1 with 1369 views | chad |
| Legal action it is then on 20:46 - Aug 1 by Nortbankboy |
Well we are looking to replace mcbernie.
Would spend money on a replacement or keep
The money back in case they have pay compensation? |
Personally would have acted with honesty and integrity in the first place and not created this situation.
Given what has gone before, weak attempts at moral blackmail, sans moral compass, are more than a little embarrassing. |  | | |
| Legal action it is then on 21:02 - Aug 1 with 1368 views | exiledclaseboy |
| Legal action it is then on 21:01 - Aug 1 by londonlisa2001 |
Well (a) we weren’t planning on spending the McBurnie money anyway (according to Cooper and Birch) and (b) the owners and past owners and the club are not fungible. [Post edited 1 Aug 2019 21:02]
|
I had to google “fungible”. It’s a new word for me. Awesome! | |
| |
| Legal action it is then on 21:04 - Aug 1 with 1358 views | exiledclaseboy |
| Legal action it is then on 21:02 - Aug 1 by chad |
Personally would have acted with honesty and integrity in the first place and not created this situation.
Given what has gone before, weak attempts at moral blackmail, sans moral compass, are more than a little embarrassing. |
Well said. Missed you at the forum by the way. It was over much quicker than normal.  | |
| |
| Legal action it is then on 21:05 - Aug 1 with 1355 views | Nortbankboy |
| Legal action it is then on 20:58 - Aug 1 by NeathJack |
Because you are deliberately trying to muddy the waters by spreading a false impression that the club will pay for the legal case out of it's own coffers. |
Just because I don't agree with,does that mean I should be banned? | | | |
| Legal action it is then on 21:05 - Aug 1 with 1355 views | monmouth |
| Legal action it is then on 21:01 - Aug 1 by londonlisa2001 |
Well (a) we weren’t planning on spending the McBurnie money anyway (according to Cooper and Birch) and (b) the owners and past owners and the club are not fungible. [Post edited 1 Aug 2019 21:02]
|
There is still this idea that all the clubs money can be put straight into Yankee pockets.
I had to look up fungible though... |  |
| |
| Legal action it is then on 21:09 - Aug 1 with 1337 views | exiledclaseboy |
| Legal action it is then on 21:05 - Aug 1 by monmouth |
There is still this idea that all the clubs money can be put straight into Yankee pockets.
I had to look up fungible though... |
She’s such a show off. | |
| |
| Legal action it is then on 21:10 - Aug 1 with 1322 views | Darran |
| Legal action it is then on 21:02 - Aug 1 by exiledclaseboy |
I had to google “fungible”. It’s a new word for me. Awesome! |
Sounds like something Canesten could cure. | |
| |
| Legal action it is then on 21:14 - Aug 1 with 1300 views | monmouth |
| Legal action it is then on 21:09 - Aug 1 by exiledclaseboy |
She’s such a show off. |
That’s Oxbridge for you.
Just try and fungible someone at Swansea Tech and see what you get. | |
| |
| Legal action it is then on 21:14 - Aug 1 with 1297 views | dobjack2 |
| Legal action it is then on 20:54 - Aug 1 by NeathJack |
This stooge should be banned. |
I agree with you that this person is probably a stooge, however they are obvious and bad at what they do.
Their posts act as a reminder of how the club was run under the banner of “by the fans for the fans.” | | | |
| Legal action it is then on 21:18 - Aug 1 with 1275 views | Nortbankboy |
| Legal action it is then on 21:14 - Aug 1 by dobjack2 |
I agree with you that this person is probably a stooge, however they are obvious and bad at what they do.
Their posts act as a reminder of how the club was run under the banner of “by the fans for the fans.” |
I'm no stooge,I just don't feel I have follow the crowd.
Just because 500 fans have voted for legal action
Does not mean they are representing all swans fans | | | |
| Legal action it is then on 21:22 - Aug 1 with 1259 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Legal action it is then on 21:09 - Aug 1 by exiledclaseboy |
She’s such a show off. |
Sorry. Accountant speak...
Thicko.
 | | | |
| Legal action it is then on 21:22 - Aug 1 with 1259 views | monmouth |
| Legal action it is then on 21:18 - Aug 1 by Nortbankboy |
I'm no stooge,I just don't feel I have follow the crowd.
Just because 500 fans have voted for legal action
Does not mean they are representing all swans fans |
They don’t have to. The shareholder is taking legal action as instructed by their members. Nothing to do with representing ‘swans fans’ if they are not members of the shareholders group. If they wanted to stop it they could have joined and voted against, so (almost) in the immortal words of the Pikey STFUYALL | |
| |
| Legal action it is then on 21:23 - Aug 1 with 1244 views | Nortbankboy |
| Legal action it is then on 21:22 - Aug 1 by monmouth |
They don’t have to. The shareholder is taking legal action as instructed by their members. Nothing to do with representing ‘swans fans’ if they are not members of the shareholders group. If they wanted to stop it they could have joined and voted against, so (almost) in the immortal words of the Pikey STFUYALL |
Who's the pikey? | | | |
| Legal action it is then on 21:25 - Aug 1 with 1231 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Legal action it is then on 21:14 - Aug 1 by monmouth |
That’s Oxbridge for you.
Just try and fungible someone at Swansea Tech and see what you get. |
1st term.
Obviously after how to greet the Queen , techniques for becoming Tory prime minister and how to deal with oiks. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
